Skip to main content

Transliteracies

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

Introduction

Transliteracies involve people’s mobile, emergent sense-making practices across various phenomena in a world characterized by rapid circulation of objects, ideas, and people over widening networks. Literacy researchers interested in tracing these developing ontologies across new or expanding communicational landscapes need tools and frameworks to theorize and study the instability and contingency of literacy practices “on the move.” To this end, the transliteracies framework attends to the ways people dynamically configure, synthesize, and adapt across the material/immaterial world while taking into consideration the role of objects in those mobile, emergent engagements. Following from the New London Group’s (1996) call for broadening views of literacy, the transliteracies framework emphasizes the situated, contingent, and ideological nature of meaning-making and foregrounds issues of equity by examining the ways people and resources are simultaneously connected,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review or Research in Education, 34, 329–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2010). Artifactual literacies: Every object tells a story. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, P. (2008). Flat CHAT? Reassembling literate activity. Paper presented at Writing Research Across Borders, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stornaiuolo, A., Smith, A., & Phillips, N. (in press). Theorizing a transliteracies framework for a connected world. Journal of Literacy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (2003). What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S., Joseph, C., Laccetti, J., Mason, B., Mills, S., Perril, S., & Pullinger, K. (2007). Transliteracy: Crossing divides. First Monday, 12(12). doi:10.5210/fm.v12i12.2060

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Amy Stornaiuolo , Anna Smith or Nathan C. Phillips .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Stornaiuolo, A., Smith, A., Phillips, N.C. (2016). Transliteracies. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_117-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_117-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics