Introduction
While literacy in its most narrow sense has always meant learning to make sense of language, there is so much more to literacy than simply an acquisition of language skills. With many diverse ways of communicating, literacy researchers have expanded their definitions and interpretative frameworks for literacy work by applying a multimodal literacies perspective to literacy teaching and learning. Multimodality maintains that communication is a combination of modes of representation and expression within text designs (with the term textreferring to communicative acts beyond but including print or writing). Modes can be oral through talk or public speaking; modes can be dramatic through role-playing and improvisations; modes can visualize content in drawings, paintings, and film; and of course modes can exist in print in books, newspapers, and magazines. Modes serve a variety of...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: University of Duke Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gee, J. P. (2006). Why game studies now? Video games: A new art form. Games and Culture, 1(1), 58–61.
Halliday, M. (1979). Language as social semiotic. Victoria: Edward Arnold.
Howes, D. (2006). Scent, sound and synaesthesia: Intersensoriality and material culture theory. In C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. Küchler, M. Rowlands, & P. Spyer (Eds.), Handbook of material culture (pp. 161–173). London: Sage.
Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the pathways to literacy. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
Kuby, C. (2013). Critical Literacy in the Early Childhood Classroom. New York: Teachers College.
Leander, K., & Boldt, G. (2013). Rereading “A pedagogy of multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 22–46.
Lemke, J. L. (2000). Opening up closure: Semiotics across scales. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 901(1), 100–111.
Lemke, J. L. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299–325.
Lewis, C., & Tierney, J. D. (2013). Mobilizing emotion in an urban classroom: Producing identities and transforming signs in a race-related discussion. Linguistics and Education, 24(3), 289–304.
Norris, S. (2009). Modal density and modal configurations: Multimodal actions. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 78–90). London: Routledge.
Pahl, K. (2004). Narratives, artifacts and cultural identities: an ethnographic study of communicative practices in homes. Linguistics and Education 15(4):339–358.
Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2010). Artifactual literacies: Every object tells a story. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Siegel, M. (1995). More than words: The generative power of transmediation for learning. Canadian Journal of Education, 20(4), 455–475.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Di Cesare, D.M., Rowsell, J. (2016). Multimodal Literacies. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_114-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_114-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education