Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Making Decisions on Management of Plagiarism Cases Where There Is a Deliberate Attempt to Cheat

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Academic Integrity

Abstract

This chapter provides a framework for markers who suspect that work they are assessing contains deliberately plagiarised passages. Five guiding questions are provided to assist the marker move from the point of suspicion through to deciding on and imposing appropriate penalties. Answers to the five questions are usually complex and often contested. The principles of fairness and defensibility are central to decisions regarding breaches of academic regulations and those principles shape the framework proposed for making decisions about deliberate plagiarism. Fishman’s (2009) definition of plagiarism is used to help determine whether plagiarism exists in the submitted work. The second question revolves around the marker’s decision about intent: was the plagiarism deliberate? Finding that an attempt to gain unearned academic credit has been made leads to the third question which is around the severity of the cheating. This third section outlines criteria that should be used when assessing severity of a breach and stresses the importance of local or institutional agreement on the criteria and the need for them to be explicitly stated in policy documents. Having decided the extent of the breach, the fourth step is to decide an appropriate penalty. A tariff system is proposed that provides a framework for matching defined levels of seriousness with a small number of pre-determined penalties. The fifth and final question revolves around ensuring that decisions are fair, defensible and sustainable and presents five significant factors that should be considered when establishing a framework to deal with deliberate attempts to breach academic regulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bailey, C. (2013). Negotiating writing: Challenges of the first written assignment in a UK university. In S. Sovic & M. Blythman (Eds.), International students negotiating higher education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, C., & Dooey, P. (2012). Learning in transition: Culture to culture. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association, 39, 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, C., & Dooey, P. (2014). Ensuring effective student support in higher education alleged plagiarism cases. Innovative Higher Education, 39(5), 387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, R., & Cox, A. (2005). ‘At least they’re learning something’: The hazy line between collaboration and collusion. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertram Gallant, T. (2008). Academic integrity in the twenty-first century: A teaching and learning imperative. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, S. (2007). My word! Plagiarism and college culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, E. (2009). Local plagiarisms. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(4), 415–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretag T., & Green M. (2009). Determining outcomes for academic misconduct: Is it more important to be consistent or fair? 4th Asia Pacific Educational Integrity Conference, 28–30 September Wollongong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., Wallace, M., Walker, R., Green, M., East, J., James, C., McGowan, U., & Partridge, L. (2011). Core elements of exemplary academic integrity policy in Australian higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 7(2), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., Wallace, M., Walker, R., McGowan, U., East, J., Green, M., Partridge, L., & James, C. (2013). “Teach us how to do it properly!” An Australian academic integrity student survey. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1150–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. (2007). A handbook for deterring plagiarism in higher education. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. (2014). Revisiting the management of student plagiarism in the light of ideas outlined in 2005. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 127–144. http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk/paper/revisiting-the-management-of-student-plagiarism-in-the-light-of-ideas-outlined-in-2005/ Accessed 2 Nov 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J., & Appleton, J. (2005). Towards consistent penalty decisions for breaches of academic regulations in one UK university. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1(1), 122–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll J., & Seymour D. (2006). The effect of a penalty tariff on consistent decision-making in cases of student plagiarism. In Proceedings of the JISC International Plagiarism Conference. http://www.jiscpas.ac.uk/2006papers.php.

  • Chanock, K. (2010). The right to reticence. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 543–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, U. (2005). Contrastive rhetoric. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2013). The development of source use by international postgraduate students. The Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lambert, K., Ellen, N., & Taylor, L. (2006). Chalkface challenges: A study of academic dishonesty amongst students in New Zealand tertiary institutions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(5), 485–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman T. (2009). “We know it when we see it” is not good enough: Toward a standard definition of plagiarism that transcends theft, fraud, and copyright, 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity (4APCEI) 28–30 September, University of Wollongong NSW Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Q., Schweisfurth, M., & Day, C. (2010). Learning and growing in a ‘foreign’ context: Intercultural experiences of international students. Compare, 40(1), 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, J. (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In U. Connor & R. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 141–152). Reading: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. M. (2000). Sexuality, textuality: The cultural work of plagiarism. College English, 62(4), 473–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt R. (2004). Whose silverware is this? Promoting plagiarism through pedagogy. JISC Plagiarism Advisory Service Conference, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK. 24–28 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster T., & Clarke R. (2012). Dealing with contract cheating: A question of attribution. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/stem-conference/Computing1/Thomas_Lancaster_Robert_Clarke.pdf.

  • Levin P. (2003). Beat the witch-hunt! Peter Levin’s guide to avoiding and rebutting accusations of plagiarism, for conscientious students. http://student-friendly-guides.com/wp-content/uploads/Beat-the-Witch-hunt.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2014.

  • Marshall, S., & Garry, M. (2006). NESB and ESB students’ attitudes and perceptions of plagiarism. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2(1), 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., & van Haeringen, K. (2011). Can a policy change practice? An evidence-based approach to developing policy. The International Journal for Educational Integrity, 7(2), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. (2005). Cheating among college and university students: A north American perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, S. (2012). Citations in search of a purpose: Source use and authorial voice in L2 student writing. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 8(1), 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, U. (2005). Does educational integrity mean teaching students NOT to ‘use their own words’? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris E., & Carroll J. (2011). Policy works: Recommendations for reviewing policy to manage unacceptable academic practice in higher education, Higher Education Academy. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/academicintegrity/policy_works.

  • Neville C. (2009). International students, writing and referencing. Referencing and Writing Symposium, University of Bradford, UK. 9 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students – literature and lessons. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2004). Rebels without a clause: Towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(3), 291–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D. (2010). Academic writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, D., Burton, M., Balcombe, K., Batemand, I., & Mulatue, A. (2015). Contract cheating and the market in essays. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 111(2015), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltmarsh, S. (2004). Graduating tactics: Theorising plagiarism as consumptive practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(4), 445–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. (2005). Writing in the international classroom. In J. Carroll & J. Ryan (Eds.), Teaching international students: Improving learning for all. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland-Smith, W. (2010). Retribution, deterrence and reform: The dilemmas of plagiarism. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennant P., & Duggan F. (2008). Academic misconduct benchmarking research project: Part 2. https://www.york.ac.uk/media/staffhome/learningandteaching/documents/keyfactors/AMBeR_PartII_Full_Report.pdf

  • Tennant P., & Rowell G. (2009–10). Benchmark plagiarism tariff: A benchmark tariff for the application of penalties for student plagiarism in higher education. www.plagiarismadvice.org/BTariff.pdf

  • Walker, J. (1998). Student plagiarism in universities: What are we doing about it? Higher Education Research and Development, 17(1), 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2002). Academic dishonesty: An educator’s guide. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, S., & Chien, R. (2007). Evaluation of a process and proforma for making consistent decisions about the seriousness of plagiarism incidents. Quality in Higher Education, 13(2), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zivcakova, L., Wood, E., Forsyth, G., Dhillon, N., Ball, D., Corolis, B., & Petkovski, M. (2012). Examining the impact of dons providing peer instruction for academic integrity: Dons’ and students’ perspectives. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(2), 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Independent Educational Development Consultant, Formerly at Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK

    Jude Carroll

Authors
  1. Jude Carroll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jude Carroll .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Australia, School of Management, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

    Tracey Bretag

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Carroll, J. (2016). Making Decisions on Management of Plagiarism Cases Where There Is a Deliberate Attempt to Cheat. In: Bretag, T. (eds) Handbook of Academic Integrity. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_54

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation