Custom Essay Writers, Freelancers, and Other Paid Third Parties

Reference work entry


Almost any sort of higher education assignment can now be purchased from a third party, from traditional essays all the way through to paying someone else to sit an exam. The use of custom essay-writing companies, freelancers, exam stand-ins, and other paid third parties represents a potentially significant problem for the provision of education around the world. This chapter provides a summary of this fast-evolving issue in education. We focus on written assignments, which are cheap and easy to access. Prewritten assignments are available instantly, while bespoke custom-written assignments can be purchased with a few hours’ notice. The extent of their use is difficult to ascertain, but the limited evidence available indicates that it is widespread. The detection of their use is, at best, difficult and time-consuming. Preventative and deterrent strategies may be more effective. One author (PN) proposes preventative strategies based upon assessment design. The other (CL) proposes deterrent strategies based upon a legal approach. There is a legislative basis for the use of legal approaches to prevent misuse of paid services in higher education, and a summary of existing legislation is given, alongside examples of cases where it has been used.


Legal Action Academic Work Attorney General Academic Integrity State Legislation 


  1. Anonymous. (2013, August 1). Why I write for an essay mill. Retrieved 30 Oct 2013.
  2. Bartlett, T. (2009). Cheating goes global as essay mills multiply. Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(28).
  3. Capano, K. M. (1991–1992). Note, stopping students from cheating: Halting the activities of term-paper mills and enforcing disciplinary sanctions against students who purchase term papers. Journal of College and University Law, 18, 277.Google Scholar
  4. ‘Cheating’ in essays up for sale. (2012, November 14). BBC. Retrieved from
  5. Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2013). Commercial aspects of contract cheating. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 219–224). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2462476.2462497.Google Scholar
  6. Comment – Term paper companies and the constitution. (1973). Duke Law Journal. 1275.Google Scholar
  7. Dante, E. (2010, November 12). The Shadow Scholar. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
  8. Dickerson, D. (2007). Facilitated plagiarism: The Saga of term-paper mills and the failure of legislation and litigation to control them. Villanova Law Review, 52, 21.Google Scholar
  9. Education Amendment Act, Section 292E: Inserted, on 30 August 2011, by section 42, 2011 (2011 No. 66).Google Scholar
  10. Elder, V. (2013). University essays to order sold online. Otago Daily Times, 13 May 2013.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, C. G., & Srinivasan, P. (2012). With a little help from the crowd: Receiving unauthorized academic assistance through online labor markets. In Privacy, security, risk and trust (PASSAT), 2012 international conference on and 2012 international conference on social computing (SocialCom), Washington, DC (pp. 904–909). doi:10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.140Google Scholar
  12. Heather, B., & Fensome, A. (2013). Cheating service test for new law. The Dominion Post, 13 May 2013.Google Scholar
  13. Henry, R., Flyn, C., & Glass, K. (2014). £630 and I’ll put you on the way to a first.
  14. Hosny, M., & Fatima, S. (2014). Attitude of students towards cheating and plagiarism: University case study. Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(8), 748–757. doi:10.3923/jas.2014.748.757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Juni, S., Gross, J., & Sokolowska, J. (2006). Academic cheating as a function of defense mechanisms and object relations. Psychological Reports, 98(3), 627–639. doi:10.2466/pr0.98.3.627-639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Macellari v. Carroll, Case No. 05-4161-JPG (S.D. Ill. 2005).Google Scholar
  17. Mahmood, Z. (2009). Contract cheating: A new phenomenon in cyber-plagiarism. Communications of the IBIMA, 10(12), 93–97.Google Scholar
  18. Malouff, J. M., Emmerton, A. J., & Schutte, N. S. (2013). The risk of a halo bias as a reason to keep students anonymous during grading. Teaching of Psychology. doi:10.1177/0098628313487425Google Scholar
  19. Matthews, D. (2013, October). Essay mills: University course work to order. Retrieved 30 Oct 2013.
  20. McCormick, M., & Whaley, H. (2014). Term paper mills: Statutes and legislative information.
  21. New Zealand Qualification Authority. General Web Site at
  22. Newton, P. M. (2015). Academic integrity: A quantitative study of confidence and understanding in students at the start of their higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Advance Online Publication 27 Mar 2015.
  23. O’Malley, M., & Roberts, T. S. (2012). Plagiarism on the rise? Combating contract cheating in science courses. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education (formerly CAL-Laborate International), 20(4). Retrieved from
  24. Osipian, A. (2012). Grey areas in the higher education sector: Legality versus corruptibility. Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, 2012(1), 141–190.Google Scholar
  25. Overseas students ‘buying essays’. (2008, March 3). BBC.
  26. Parents ‘buy essays’ for students. (2008, January 14). BBC.
  27. Savage, J. (2014). $1.1m paid to uni cheat suspects. New Zealand Herald, 28 Mar 2014.Google Scholar
  28. State v. Magee, 102 Misc.2d 345 (1979).Google Scholar
  29. State v. Saksniit, 69 Misc. 554, 332 N.Y.S.2d 343 (Sup. Ct. 1972).Google Scholar
  30. Tennant, P., & Duggan, F. (2008). Academic Misconduct Benchmarking Research (AMBeR) Project part II executive summary (projects).
  31. Tomar, D. (2012). The Shadow Scholar: How I made a living helping college kids cheat (1st ed.). New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  32. Turnitin. (2013). Paying for plagiarism.
  33. Unemployed Professors – Frequently Asked Questions. (2014).
  34. Walker, M., & Townley, C. (2012). Contract cheating: A new challenge for academic honesty? Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(1), 27–44. doi:10.1007/s10805-012-9150-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wallace, M. J., & Newton, P. M. (2014). Turnaround time and market capacity in contract cheating. Educational Studies, 40(2), 233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of MedicineSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
  2. 2.Office of Appeals, Discipline and Faculty GrievancesUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations