Encyclopedia of Geropsychology

Living Edition
| Editors: Nancy A. Pachana

Motive Congruency and Person–Environment Fit of Aging Workers

  • Guido HertelEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_235-1

Synonyms

Definitions

According to the theory of dual motive systems (e.g., McClelland et al. 1989), two independent motive systems exist within humans: Implicit motives which are usually unconscious and directed toward intrinsic incentives of activities (e.g., task enjoyment, being together with others) and self-attributed explicit motives directed toward extrinsic incentives of activities (e.g., monetary benefits, acknowledgment from others). Motive congruency is considered in this entry as positive correlation between implicit and explicit motives within a person. Whereas high motive congruency is assumed to be connected with positive experiences, low motive congruency should be connected with negative experiences due to motive conflicts (e.g., Kehr 2004).

Person–environment fit at work is defined as compatibility between characteristics of an individual worker and the work environment (Kristof-Brown et al. 2005)....

Keywords

Young Worker Achievement Motive Work Motivation Work Domain Implicit Motive 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumann, N., Kaschel, R., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Striving for unwanted goals: Stress-dependent discrepancies between explicit and implicit achievement motives reduce subjective well-being and increase psychosomatic symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 781–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunstein, J. C. (2010). Implicit motives and explicit goals: The role of motivational congruence in emotional well-being. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 3–29). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cable, D., & DeRue, D. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charles, S. T. (2010). Strength and vulnerability integration: A model of emotional well-being across adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1068–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  8. Feldman, D. C., & Vogel, R. M. (2009). The aging process and person-environment fit. In S. G. Baugh & S. E. Sullivan (Eds.), Research in careers (pp. 1–25). Charlotte: Information Age Press.Google Scholar
  9. Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of lifespan development. Psychological Review, 117, 32–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hertel, G., & Zacher, H. (in press). Managing an aging workforce. In C. Viswesvaran, N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, & H. K. Sinangil (Eds.), The sage handbook of industrial, work, & organizational psychology, (2nd ed., Vol. 3). Thousand Oakes: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Hertel, G., Thielgen, M., Rauschenbach, C., Grube, A., Stamov-Roßnagel, C., & Krumm, S. (2013). Age differences in motivation and stress at work. In C. Schlick, E. Frieling, & J. Wegge (Eds.), Age-differentiated work systems (pp. 119–147). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hertel, G., Rauschenbach, C., Thielgen, M. M., & Krumm, S. (2015). Are older workers more active copers? Longitudinal effects of age-contingent coping on strain at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 514–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Higgins, E. T. (2009). Regulatory fit in the goal-pursuit process. In G. B. Moskowitz & H. Grant (Eds.), The psychology of goals. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Higgins, E. T., Cornwell, J. F. M., & Franks, B. (in press). “Happiness” and “The Good Life” as motives working together effectively. In Elliot, A. J. (Ed.), Advances in motivation science. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality research form manual. Port Huron: Research Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2011). Directional discrepancy between implicit and explicit power motives is related to well-being among managers. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kehr, H. M. (2004). Integrating implicit motives, explicit motives, and perceived abilities: The compensatory model of work motivation and volition. Academy of Management Review, 29, 479–499.Google Scholar
  18. Köllner, M. G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence between implicit and explicit measures of the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 826, 1–20.Google Scholar
  19. Kooij, D. T. A. M., De Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G. W., Kanfer, R., & Dikkers, J. S. E. (2011). Age and work-related motives: Results of a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 197–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kristof-Brown, A., & Guay, R. P. (2011). Person– environment fit. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Handbook of industrial/organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 3–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  21. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krumm, S., Grube, A., & Hertel, G. (2013). No time for compromises: Age as a moderator of the relation between needs-supply fit and job satisfaction. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 547–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Labouvie-Vief, G. (2003). Dynamic integration: Affect, cognition, and the self in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lang, J. W. B., Zettler, I., Ewen, C., & Hülsheger, U. R. (2012). Implicit motives, explicit traits, and task and contextual performance at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1201–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). The relationships of age with job attitudes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 63, 677–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pang, J. S., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2005). Assessing implicit motives in U. S. college students: Effects of picture type and position, gender and ethnicity, and cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 280–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schultheiss, O. C. (2008). Implicit motives. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 603–633). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  29. Schwarz, N., & Knäuper, B. (2000). Cognition, aging, and self-reports. In D. Park & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Cognitive aging: A primer (pp. 233–252). Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  30. Sokolowski, K., Schmalt, H.-D., Langens, T. A., & Puca, R. M. (2000). Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once: The Multi-Motive-Grid (MMG). Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 126–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stamov-Roßnagel, C., & Hertel, G. (2010). Older workers’ motivation: against the myth of general decline. Management Decision, 48, 894–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thielgen, M. M., Krumm, S., & Hertel, G. (2015a). When being old pays off – Age mitigates adverse effects of low implicit-explicit motive congruency on work motivation. Journal of Career Assessment, 23, 459–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thielgen, M. M., Krumm, S., Rauschenbach, C., & Hertel, G. (2015b). Older but wiser: Age moderates congruency effects between implicit and explicit motives on job satisfaction. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 182–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thrash, T. M., Cassidy, S. E., Maruskin, L. A., & Elliot, A. J. (2010). Factors that influence the relation between implicit and explicit motives: A general implicit–explicit congruence framework. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 308–346). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2009). Remaining time and opportunities at work: Relationships between age, work characteristics, and occupational future time perspective. Psychology and Aging, 24, 487–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zacher, H., Feldman, D. C., & Schulz, H. (2014). Age, occupational strain, and well-being: A person-environment fit perspective. Research in Occupational Stress and Well-being, 12, 83–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany