Abstract
Despite increasing globalization in science, significant differences remain across the Americas in countries’ approaches to research integrity. These differences are attributable to multiple factors, including the size of individual nations’ scientific communities, the role of science in their national economies and strategies for development, and their overall approaches to policy and governance. A comparison of the United States, Argentina, and Brazil illustrates the importance of governance in relation to responses to perceived wrongdoing and the role of education in efforts to promote integrity in research. The United States’ commitment to federal funding of science and science education has led to a federal regulatory response to research misconduct and an emphasis on compliance with federal mandates for research integrity education. By contrast, Argentina’s shrinking public and private support of scientific research and education has diminished not only its scientific productivity but also the professional engagement necessary for effective governance and enforcement of ethical standards. Brazil’s recent emergence as a leader in research and development, made possible in part by dedicated governmental funding for science, has been accompanied by both professional attention to international standards and calls for new educational initiatives in research integrity. These examples highlight how the political contexts of science and the national cultures in which research is conducted may present challenges to international efforts to establish a common educational commitment to research integrity.
References
I BRISPE. (2011). Relatório do I Brazilian Meeting on Research Integrity, Science and Publication Ethics. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Retrieved from http://www.iibrispe.coppe.ufrj.br/index.php/i-brispe/report
II BRISPE. (2012). Joint statement of the II Brazilian meeting on research integrity, science and publication ethics. Retrieved from http://www.iibrispe.coppe.ufrj.br/images/IIBRISPE/JoinStatement/JointStatementonResearchIntegrity_IIBRISPE_2012_English.pdf
II BRISPE. (2013). Relatório do II Brazilian Meeting on Research Integrity, Science and Publication Ethics. Retrieved from http://www.iibrispe.coppe.ufrj.br/images/IIBRISPE/report_ii_brispe_2013_v2.pdf
III BRISPE. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.fapesp.br/8788
4th World Conference on Research Integrity (2015). Research Integrity, Science and its Reward Systems. Background. Retrieved from http://www.wcri2015.org
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias. (2010). Avaliação da 4ª CNCTI (Evaluation of the 4th CNCTI). Retrieved from http://www.abc.org.br/article.php3?id_article=764
Alisson, E. (2013). Pesquisa de qualidade, não de quantidade (Research of quality, not quantity). Agência FAPESP. Retrieved from http://agencia.fapesp.br/pesquisa_de_qualidade_nao_de_quantidade/17608/
Ana, J., Koehlmoos, T., Smith, R., & Yan, L. L. (2013). Research misconduct in low and middle income countries. PLoS Medicine, 10(3), 1–6.
Angell, M., & Relman, A. S. (1988). Fraud in biomedical research: A time for congressional restraint. New England Journal of Medicine, 318(22), 1462–1463.
Boesz, C. (2008). Collaborations: Investigating international misconduct. Nature, 452, 686–687. doi:10.1038/452686a.
Bound, K. (2008). Brazil: The natural knowledge economy (The atlas of ideas series). London: Demos.
Bradshaw, R.A., for the Coalition of Biological Scientists. (1996). Letter to William F. Raub, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, May 13, 1996.
Bush, V. (1945). Science, the endless frontier. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm.
Camargo, K. R., Jr. (2013a). Produção científica: avaliação da qualidade ou ficção contábil? (Scientific production: quality evaluation or accountable fiction?). Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 29(9), 1707–1711. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext%26pid=S0102-311X2013000900003%26lng=pt%26nrm=iso.
Camargo, K. R., Jr. (2013b). Sigamos em frente? (Are we moving ahead?). Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 29(9), 1727–1730. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext%26pid=S0102-311X2013000900013%26lng=en%26nrm=iso.
Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos, CGEE. (2013). Ciência para o desenvolvimento sustentável global: contribuição do Brasil síntese dos encontros preparatórios ao FMC [Forum Mundial de Ciência] (Science for sustainable global development: Brazil’s contribution synthesizes preparatory meetings at the World Science Forum). Retrieved from http://www.sbpcnet.org.br/site/arquivos/arquivo_374.pdf
Charette, R.N. (2013). The STEM crisis is a myth. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved from: http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/education/the-stem-crisis-is-a-myth
Ciência sem Fronteiras (Science without Borders). (2014). O programa (The program). http://www.cienciasemfronteiras.gov.br/web/csf
Comité Nacional de Ética en la Ciencia y la Tecnología, CECTE (National Committee on Ethics in Science and Technology). (2013). Proposiciones para una ciencia y una tecnología socialmente responsables. (Proposals for a socially responsible science and technology). Argentinean Ministry of Science, Technology, and Productive Innovation. Retrieved from http://www.cecte.gov.ar/pdf/000065-es.pdf
Comité Nacional de Ética en la Ciencia y la Tecnología, CECTE (National Committee on Ethics in Science and Technology, CECTE). (2001). Objectives. Retrieved from http://en.mincyt.gob.ar/ministerio/national-committee-of-ethics-in-science-and-technology-cecte-22
Comité Nacional de Ética en la Ciencia y la Tecnología, CECTE. (National Committee on Ethics in Science and Technology) (2008). Análisis y recomendaciones para una ética en las prácticas de la investigación. (Analysis and recommendations for ethics in research practice). Argentinean Ministry of Science, Technology, and Productive Innovation. Retrieved from http://desamin1.mincyt.gob.ar/informes/analisis-y-recomendaciones-para-una-etica-en-las-practicas-de-la-investigacion-8020
Commission on Research Integrity. (1995). Integrity and misconduct in research. Report of the Commission on Research Integrity. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://ori.hhs.gov/images/ddblock/report_commission.pdf.
Committee on Publication Ethics. (2014). Guidelines. Retrieved from http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines
Conselho Nacional do Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development). (2011). Diretrizes (Directives). Retrieved from http://www.cnpq.br/web/guest/diretrizes
Conselho Nacional do Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development). (2012). Evento discute integridade em pesquisa, ética na ciência e em publicações (Event discusses integrity in research, ethics in science and publications). Retrieved from http://www.cnpq.br/web/guest/noticiasviews/-/journal_content/56_INSTANCE_a6MO/10157/232045
Cottingham, K. (2002, November 8). Getting scientists to do the right thing. Science Careers. Retrieved from http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2002_11_08/nodoi.11032346436982976453
Cruz, C.H.B. (2014). Science and technology in São Paulo, Brazil. Retrieved from http://www.fapesp.br/eventos/2014/11/weekcalifornia/FWC_Brito.pdf
Cruz, C.H.B., & Chaimovich, H. (2010). Brazil. In United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. UNESCO science report 2010: The current status of science around the world. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001898/189883E.pdf
Fundação Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, CAPES. (2010). Plano nacional de pos-graduaçao, 2011–2020 (National postgraduate plan 2011–2020). Retrieved from http://www.capes.gov.br/images/stories/download/PNPG_Miolo_V2.pdf
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation). (2011). Code of good scientific practice. Retrieved from http://www.fapesp.br/boaspraticas/FAPESP-Code_of_Good_Scientific_Practice_2014.pdf
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation). (2013). Reunião Preparativa para o Fórum Mundial de Ciência 2013. Retrieved from http://www.fapesp.br/wsf2013/program
De Young, K., & Nelson, D. (2000, December 21). The body hunters: Latin America is ripe for trials and fraud. The Washington Post, A:01
Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). NOT-OD-00-045. PHS announces draft policy on instruction in the responsible conduct of research for public comment. July 17. Retrieved from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-045.html
Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). NOT-OD-01-020. Notice of suspension of PHS policy. February 22.
DuBois, J. M., Schilling, D., Heitman, E., Steneck, N. H., & Kon, A. A. (2010). Instruction in the responsible conduct of research: An inventory of programs and materials within CTSAs. Clinical and Translational Science, 3, 109–111.
Elustondo, G. (2003, May 22). Denuncian que el Estado no controla pruebas de drogas en pacientes con cáncer (State denounced for not controlling clinical drug trials with cancer patients.) Clarín. Retrieved from http://edant.clarin.com/diario/2003/05/22/s-02801.htm
Finn, R. (2000). Reports bring several changes to IRBs. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 92(16), 1287–1290.
Fryer-Edwards, K. (2002). Addressing the hidden curriculum in scientific research. American Journal of Bioethics, 2(4), 58–59.
Garrafa, V., & Lorenzo, C. (2008). Moral imperialism and multi-centric trials in peripheral countries. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 24(10), 2219–2226.
Geller, G., Boyce, A., Ford, D. E., & Sugarman, J. (2010). Beyond “compliance”: The role of institutional culture in promoting research integrity. Academic Medicine, 85(8), 1296–1302. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e5f0e5.
Gold, B. D. (1993). Congressional activities regarding misconduct and integrity in science. In National Academy of Science, Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research (Ed.), Responsible science, volume II: Background papers and resource documents (pp. 90–115). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Greene, J.L. (2015). É hora de rever o sistema de pós-graduação brasileiro. SciELO em Perspectiva. Retrieved from http://blog.scielo.org/blog/2015/01/26/e-hora-de-rever-o-sistema-de-pos-graduacao-brasileiro/
Gupta, N., Weber, C., Peña, V., Shipp, S.S., & Healey, D. (2013). Innovation policies of Brazil, IDA Paper P-5039. Alexandria: Institute for Defense Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.ida.org/~/media/Corporate/Files/Publications/STPIPubs/2014/ida-p-5039.ashx
Heitman, E., & Bulger, R. E. (2005). Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content. Accountability in Research, 12, 207–224.
Heitman, E., & Litewka, S. (2011). International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 29(4), 104–108.
Heitman, E., Olsen, C. H., Anestidou, L., & Bulger, R. E. (2007). New graduate students’ baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82, 838–845.
Hicks, J. (2013) Opinion: ethics training in science. The Scientist, May 13. Retrieved from http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/35543/title/Opinion- -Ethics-Training-in-Science/
Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, Committee on the Responsible Conduct of Research. (1989). The responsible conduct of research in the health sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, Committee on Assessing Integrity in Scientific Research. (2002). Integrity in scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2014). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. Retrieved from http://www.icmje.org/
International Council for Science, ICSU. (2014). International workshop “Science Assessment and Research Integrity”. Retrieved from http://www.icsu.org/freedom-responsibility/research-integrity/pdf-images/Science_assessment_research_integrity_WS_programme_2014_04.pdf
Judson, H. F. (2004). The great betrayal: Fraud in science. Orlando: Harcourt.
La Política On Line. (2011). Una denuncia de corrupción golpea a Barañao y el mundo científico (An accusation of corruption hits the scientific world). Retrieved from http://www.lapoliticaonline.com/nota/36974/
LaFollette, M. C. (1994). The politics of research misconduct: Congressional oversight, universities, and science. Journal of Higher Education, 65(3), 261–285.
Laplane, M. (2013). Cientista analisa o sistema de pós-graduação no Brasil. (Scientist analyzes the postgraduate system in Brazil). Retrieved from http://www.sinprodf.org.br/cientista-analisa-o-sistema-de-pos-graduacao-no-brasil
Marques, F. (2014). Do compromisso à ação. Revista Pesquisa FAPESP. Retrieved from http://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/2014/09/16/compromisso-acao/
Meabe, J. E. (2007). La rutinización de la indiferencia ética y el aplanamiento de los valores en la Argentina actual. (The normalization of ethical indifference and the flattening of values in today’s Argentina). Dikaiosyne, 19, 34–56.
Meneghini, R., & Packer, A. L. (2007). Is there science beyond English? Initiatives to increase the quality and visibility of non-English publications might help to break down language barriers in scientific communication. EMBO Reports, 8, 112–116. Retrieved from http://embor.embopress.org/content/8/2/112.
Minaya, A., Fuentes, D., & Barboza, M. (2011). Proceso de fortalecimiento de comités de ética en investigación en el Perú. (The process of strengthening ethics committees in Peru). Revista Red Bioética – UNESCO, 3, 46–54.
Montgomery, K., & Oliver, A. L. (2009). Shifts in guidelines for ethical scientific conduct – how public and private organizations create and change norms of research integrity. Social Studies of Science, 39(1), 137–155.
Moskvitch, K. (2014). What Argentina’s financial woes means for science. Nature News. doi:10.1038/nature.2014.15744.
Mumford, M. D., Steel, L., & Watts, L. W. (2014). Evaluating ethics education programs: A multilevel approach. Ethics & Behavior, 25(1), 37–60.
National Academy of Sciences. Committee on Global Science and Technology Strategies (2010). SIT strategies for six countries. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Institutes of Health. (1989). Requirement for programs on the responsible conduct of research in national research service training award institutional training programs. NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, 18(45), 1. Retrieved from http://www.grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/historical/1989_12_22_Vol_18_No_45.pdf.
National Institutes of Health. (1994, June 17). Reminder and update: Requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research in National Research Service Award Institutional Training Grants. NIH Guide, 23(23). Retrieved from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not94-200.html
National Institutes of Health. (1996). Important events in DRG history. NIH Almanac. Division of Research Grants. Retrieved from http://nih.gov/about/almanac/archive/96_Almanac/chapt2/oddrg.htm
National Institutes of Health. (2009). NOT-OD-10-019. NIH Update on the Requirement for Instruction in the responsible conduct of research. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-019.htm
National Science Board. (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014. Arlington: National Science Foundation (NSB 14-01. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/.
National Science Foundation. (1998). Frequently asked questions (FAQ) about the Integrative Graduate Education and Research Training (IGERT) Program. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1998/nsf98116/nsf98116.pdf
National Science Foundation. (2009). Responsible conduct of research. NSF’s implementation of Section 7009 of the America COMPETES Act. Federal Register, 74(160), 42126–42128. Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2009-08-20/html/E9-19930.htm.
National Science Foundation. (2011). RCR frequently asked questions (FAQs). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/rcr/rcrfaqs.jsp#4
National Science Foundation. (2014). National Science Foundation history: A timeline of NSF history. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/about/history/
Office of Research Integrity. (2011). Historical background. Retrieved from http://ori.hhs.gov/historical-background
Office of Research Integrity. (2012). RCR Resource Development Program. Retrieved from https://ori.hhs.gov/print/rcr-resource-development-program
Office of Research Integrity. (2014). Foreign organization statement. Retrieved from http://ori.hhs.gov/foreign-organization-statement
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Science and technology indicators: Science and innovations: Brazil. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/brazil/sti-outlook-2012-brazil.pdf
Perelis, L. D., Palmero, A., & Roitman, A. (2012). Conducta responsable en investigación. Definiciones y aplicaciones ejemplificación a través de un caso argentino: el caso Crotoxina (Responsible conduct in research. Definitions and applications exemplified through an Argentinean case: The Crotoxina case). Revista Red Bioética – UNESCO, 5, 43–54.
Porter, J. P., & Dustira, A. K. (1993). Policy development lessons from two federal initiatives: Protecting human research subjects and handling misconduct in science. Academic Medicine, 68(9), S51–S55.
Resnick, D. B., & Dinse, G. E. (2012). Do U.S. research institutions meet or exceed federal requirements for instruction in responsible conduct of research? A national survey. Academic Medicine, 87(9), 1237–1242.
Saenz, C., Heitman, E., Luna, F., Litewka, S., Goodman, K., & Macklin, R. (2014). Twelve years of Fogarty-funded bioethics training in Latin America and the Caribbean: Achievements and challenges. Journal of Empirical Research in Human Research Ethics, 9(2), 80–91.
Saguier, E.R. (2012a). Argentina: complicidad de políticos y periodistas en la corrupción científico-técnica. (Argentina: Complicity of politicians and journalists in techno-scientific corruption). El Libre Pensador. Retrieved from http://www.ellibrepensador.com/2013/06/11/argentina-complicidad-de-politicos-y-periodistas-en-la-corrupcion-cientifico-tecnica/print/
Saguier, E. R. (2012b). Historia de la corrupción en la ciencia argentina. (History of corruption in Argentinean science). Salta 21: Cultura y Actualidad. Retrieved from http://www.salta21.com/Historia-de-la-corrupcion-en-la.html
Salerno, M. S., Lins, L. M., Oliveira de Araujo, B. C. P., Gomes, L. A. V., Toledo, D., & Nascimento, P. A. M. M. (2013). Uma proposta de sistematização do debate sobre falta de engenheiros no Brasil. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo. Retrieved from http://www.iea.usp.br/eventos/documentos/uma-proposta-de-sistematizacao-do-debate-sobre-falta-de-engenheiros-no-brasil.
Sieber, J. (2013). The paradox of teaching responsible conduct of research. Journal of Empirical Research in Human Research Ethics, 8(2), 93–94.
Sparks, J. (2002). Timeline of laws related to the protection of human subjects. Bethesda: Office of History, National Institutions of Health. Retrieved from http://history.nih.gov/about/timelines_laws_human.html.
Sparks, J. (2011). Timeline of laws related to animal subjects. Bethesda: Office of History, National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from http://history.nih.gov/about/timelines_laws_animal.html.
Steneck, N. H. (1994). Research universities and scientific misconduct: History, policies, and the future. Journal of Higher Education, 65(3), 310–330.
Steneck, N. H. (2004). ORI introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Rockville: HHS Office of Research Integrity.
Steneck, N. H., & Bulger, R. E. (2007). The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 829–834.
Tealdi, J. C. (2006). Historia y significado de las normas éticas internacionales sobre investigaciones biomédicas. (History and meaning of international ethical norms on biomedical research). In G. Keyeux, V. Penchaszadeh, & A. Saada (Eds.), Ética de la investigación en seres humanos y políticas de salud pública (pp. 33–36). Bogotá: UNESCO-Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Retrieved from http://derechopenalmedico.blogspot.com/2009/05/bioeticas-portada-del-sitio-documentos_27.html.
The Economist. (2011, November 5) Science in Argentina: Cristina, the alchemist. The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/printedition/2011-11-05
Transparency International. (2014). Corruption Perception Index 2013. Retrieved from http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2013/results/
Van Noorden, R. (2014). South America by the numbers. Nature, 510, 202–203.
Vasconcelos, S. (2012). Integridade e conduta responsável na pesquisa: grandes desafios. Pesquisa FAPESP, 200, 58–59. Retrieved from http://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/2012/10/11/integridade-e-conduta-responsavel-na-pesquisa-grandes-desafios/.
Vasconcelos, S., Leta, J., Costa, L., Pinto, A., & Sorenson, M. M. (2009). Discussing plagiarism in Latin American science. EMBO Reports, 10(7), 677–682. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2727439/.
World Bank. (1997). Helping countries combat corruption: The role of the World Bank. Retrieved from http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/anticorrupt/corruptn/coridx.htm
World Bank. (2014). World development indicators: Science and technology. Retrieved from http://wdi.worldbank.org/table/5.13
Yriart, M., & Braginsky, R. (1998). Resurrection of the Crotoxina case (1989–1996): Science, politics and media. Revista Redes. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Argentina, 5(11), 113–139.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Kenneth W. Goodman, PhD, for his comments on an early draft of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Heitman, E., Litewka, S., Vasconcelos, S. (2015). Education in Research Integrity and Governance of Science in the United States, Argentina, and Brazil. In: Bretag, T. (eds) Handbook of Academic Integrity. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_66-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_66-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-079-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education