Abstract
This chapter focuses on the complexities and paradoxes of young people’s political participation and related activism, agency, and practices. The chapter explores the ways in which young people face a range of contradictory perceptions around their political participation. They are perceived as being part of hopeful, positive, and egalitarian politics at the same time as they are considered to not have the skills or capacity to be effective political actors. This chapter contains five sections and a conclusion. The introduction (Sect. 1) provides an overview and calls for caution around the terms “youth” and “young people.” In Sect. 2, the normative positioning of young people as political agents, drawing largely from liberal political thought and its critiques based in the West, is detailed. Here the political subject in liberalism is scrutinized for its validity but also for its inadequacy. Section 3 describes a pedagogy, or a set of discourses and practices that sustains social order, and that emphasizes the creation of self-governing citizens. Section 4 of this chapter outlines the ways that this pedagogy is operationalized and enacted by institutions and civil society organizations and discusses the implications for the creation of political subjects. It engages with the expectations around youthful citizenship and the “common good.” Section 5 focuses on definitions of politics and the importance of redefining politics. It examines the relationality between acts and politics. The conclusion considers the kinds of politics such political subjects enact and questions surrounding active and activist citizenship.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahams, N. (1992). Towards reconceptualising political action. Sociological Inquiry, 62, 327–347.
Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2012). Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 89–103.
Appiah, K. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. New York: W.W. Norton.
Auvachez, E. (2009). Surpranational citizenship building and the UN: Is the UN engaged in a ‘citizenization’ process? Global Governance, 15, 43–66.
Basok, T., & Ilcan, S. (2006). In the name of human rights: Global organizations and participating citizens. Citizenship Studies, 10, 309–327.
Bayat, A. (2010). Life as politics: How ordinary people change the Middle East. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Beck, U. (2001). Freedom’s children. In U. Beck & E. Beck-Gensheim (Eds.), Individualisation (pp. 156–171). London: Sage.
Bennett, W., Wells, C., & Rank, A. (2009). Young citizens and civic learning: Two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age. Citizenship Studies, 13(2), 105–120.
Boyte, H. (2003). A different kind of politics: John Dewey and the meaning of citizenship in the 21st century. The Good Society, 12(2), 3–15.
Cerna, M. (1994). Universality of human rights and cultural diversity: Implementation of human rights in different socio-cultural contexts. Human Rights Quarterly, 16, 740–752.
Cohen, J. (1986). An epistemic conception of democracy. Ethics, 97, 26–38.
Cohen, E. (2005). Neither seen nor heard: Children’s citizenship in contemporary democracies. Citizenship Studies, 9, 221–240.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillian.
ECOSOC. (2015). Youth engagement in the transition from MDGs to SDGs: What will it take. In Informal summary United Nations economic and social council youth forum http://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/youth2015/pdf/informal_summary.pdf.
ECOSOC. (2018) .The role of youth in building sustainable and resilient urban and rural communities. Informal Summary United Nations Economic and Social Council Youth Forum, https://www.un.org/ecosoc/sites/www.un.org.ecosoc/files/files/en/2018doc/2018_ecosoc_youth_forum_summary.pdf.
Etzioni, A. (1993). The Spirit of community. New York: Touchstone Books.
Farthing, R. (2010). The politics of youthful antipolitics: Representing the ‘issue’ of youth participation in politics. Journal of Youth Studies, 13(2), 181–195.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80.
Gaus, G. (2000). Political concepts and political theories. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Translated by T. Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Häkli, J., & Kallio, K. (2014a). Subject, action and polis: Theorizing political agency. Progress in Human Geography, 38(2), 181–200.
Häkli, J., & Kallio, K. (2014b). The global as a field: Children’s rights advocacy as a transnational practice. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32, 293–309.
Hoover, J. (2013). Rereading the universal declaration of human rights: Plurality and contestation, not consensus. Journal of Human Rights, 12, 217–241.
Horton, J., & Kraftl, P. (2006). Not just growing up, but going on: Children’s geographies as becomings: Materials, spacings, bodies, situations. Children’s Geographies, 4(3), 259–276.
Ilcan, S., & Basok, T. (2004). Community government: Voluntary agencies, social justice and the responsibilization of citizens. Citizenship Studies, 8, 129–144.
Isin, E. (2006). Theorizing acts of citizenship. In E. Isin & G. Neilsen (Eds.), Acts of Citizenship (pp. 15–43). London: Zed Books.
Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state-theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34, 452–472.
Jones, A. (2014). On South Bank: The production of public space. Farnsworth: Ashgate.
Kallio, K., & Häkli, J. (2011). Tracing children’s politics. Political Geography, 30(2), 99–109.
Levinson, M. (1999). Liberalism, pluralism, and political education: Paradox or paradigm? Oxford Review of Education, 25(1–2), 39–58.
Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: Feminist perspectives. Basingstoke: Macmillian.
Mill, J. S. (1861[2006]). Considerations on Representative Government. Boston: IndyPublish.
Mills, S. (2013). ‘An instruction in good citizenship’: Scouting and the historical geographies of citizenship education. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(1), 120–134.
Mills, S., & Waite, C. (2017). Brands of youth citizenship and the politics of scale: National Citizen Service in the United Kingdom. Political Geography, 56, 66–76.
Mitchell, K. (2003). Educating the national citizen in neoliberal times: From the multicultural self to the strategic cosmopolitan. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(4), 387–403.
Mitchell, D., Attoh, K., & Staeheli, L. (2014). Whose city? What politics? Contentious and non-contentious spaces on Colorado’s front range. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014550460.
Moosa-Mitha, M. (2005). A difference-centred alternative to theorization of children’s citizenship rights. Citizenship Studies, 9(4), 369–388.
Mutua, M. (2002). Human rights: A political and cultural critique. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
Nash, K. (2009). Between citizenship and human rights. Sociology, 43, 1067–1083.
Ober, J. (2013). Democracy’s wisdom: An Aristotelian middle way for collective judgement. American Political Science Review, 107, 104–122.
Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2005). Changing citizenship: Democracy and inclusion in education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pykett, J. (2010). Citizenship education and narratives of pedagogy. Citizenship Studies, 14, 621–635.
Rancière, J. (2008). Hatred of Democracy. Translated by S. Corcoran. In Corcoran. London: Verso.
Rasmussen, C. (2011). The autonomous animal. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Roy, A. (2010). Poverty capital: Microfinance and the making of development. New York: Routledge.
Shklar, J. (1998). An education for America: Tocqueville, Hawthorne, Emerson. In S. Hoffman & D. Thompson (Eds.), Redeeming American political thought (pp. 65–79). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Skelton, T. (2007). Children, young people, UNICEF and participation. Children’s Geographies, 51, 165–181.
Skelton, T. (2010). Taking young people as political actors seriously: Opening the borders of political geography. Area, 42, 145–151.
Staeheli, L., & Hammett, D. (2010). Educating the new national citizen: Education, political subjectivity and divided societies. Citizenship Studies, 14(6), 667–680.
Staeheli, L., Ehrkamp, P., Leitner, H., & Nagel, C. (2012). Dreaming the ordinary: Daily life and the complex geographies of citizenship. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 628–644.
Staeheli, L., Marshall, D., Jeffrey, A., Nagel, C., and Hammett, D. (2014). Producing citizenship in divided societies. YouCitizen working paper 2. Available at www.youcitizen.org/images/Working%20Paper%202_Producing%20Citizenship%20in%20Divided%20Societies.pdf. Last viewed 13 Feb 2015.
Sullivan, S. (2001). Living across and through skins: Transactional bodies, pragmatism, and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Interrogating post-democratization: reclaiming egalitarian political spaces. Political Geography, 30(7), 370–380.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Staeheli, L.A. (2019). Paradoxes of Young People’s Political Participation. In: Skelton, T., Aitken, S. (eds) Establishing Geographies of Children and Young People. Geographies of Children and Young People, vol 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-041-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-041-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-040-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-041-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences