Skip to main content

Implantology of Fractures of the Distal Femur

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Orthopaedic Trauma Implantology
  • 28 Accesses

Abstract

Distal femur fractures represent a notorious yet common injury pattern accounting for 0.4–1% of all fractures. Managed conservatively in the past, surgical fixation is the gold standard accepted treatment modality in the modern orthopaedic practice. Although several implants are currently available for osteosynthesis in distal femur fractures, none has proven preeminence over the other. Anatomical periarticular locking lateral plate is the most frequently used implant in ORIF of these fractures, but high complications rates led to the advent of newer treatment modalities. Dual plating, retrograde nailing, and nail-plate construct encompass some of the recent developed techniques that have significantly improved the clinical outcomes in complex distal femur fractures. Furthermore, improvements in implant material and design have led to more biological fixation rather than merely fixing the fracture fragments anatomically. Distal femur replacement is another recent technique that provides a viable treatment option in carefully chosen patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Martinet O, Cordey J, Harder Y, Maier A, Bühler M, Barraud GE. The epidemiology of fractures of the distal femur. Injury. 2000;31:62–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Della Rocca GJ, Leung KS, Pape H-C. Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and future projections. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25:S66–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gates DJ, Alms M, Cruz MM. Hinged cast and roller traction for fractured femur. A system of treatment for the Third World. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67(5):750–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Butt MS, Krikler SJ, Ali MS. Displaced fractures of the distal femur in elderly patients: operative versus non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(1):110–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore TJ, Watson T, Green SA, Garland DE, Chandler RW. Complications of surgically treated supracondylar fractures of the femur. J Trauma. 1987;27(4):402–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ricci WM. Periprosthetic femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(3):130–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanders R, Regazzoni P, Ruedi TP. Treatment of supracondylar-intracondylar fractures of the femur using the dynamic condylar screw. J Orthop Trauma. 1989;3(3):214–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ostrum RF, Geel C. Indirect reduction and internal fixation of supracondylar femur fractures without bone graft. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9(4):278–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schatzker J, Mahomed N, Schiffman K, Kellam J. Dynamic condylar screw: a new device. A preliminary report. J Orthop Trauma. 1989;3(2):124–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giles JB, DeLee JC, Heckman JD, Keever JE. Supracondylar-intercondylar fractures of the femur treated with a supracondylar plate and lag screw. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(6):864–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schatzker J, Horne G, Waddell J. The Toronto experience with the supracondylar fracture of the femur, 1966–1972. Injury. 1974;6(2):113–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Siliski JM, Mahring M, Hofer HP. Supracondylar-intercondylar fractures of the femur. Treatment by internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(1):95–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mast J, Jakob R, Ganz R. Reduction with plates. In: Planning and Reduction Technique in Fracture Surgery. Springer; 1989. p. 48–129.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Bertram R, Holmes W, Tscherne H. Transarticular joint reconstruction and indirect plate osteosynthesis for complex distal supracondylar femoral fractures. Injury. 1997;28:A31–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Nliclau T, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) using the DCS in proximal and distal femoral fractures. Injury. 1997;28:A20–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Guy P, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: does percutaneous plating disrupt femoral blood supply less than the traditional technique? J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13(6):401–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Krettek C, Müller M, Miclau T. Evolution of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the femur. Injury. 2001;32:14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zlowodzki M, Bhandari M, Marek DJ, Cole PA, Kregor PJ. Operative treatment of acute distal femur fractures: systematic review of 2 comparative studies and 45 case series (1989 to 2005). J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(5):366–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hake ME, Davis ME, Perdue AM, Goulet JA. Modern implant options for the treatment of distal femur fractures. JAAOS-J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(19):e867–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Perren SM. Fracture healing. The evolution of our understanding. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cechoslov. 2008;75(4):241–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kregor PJ, Stannard JA, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA. Treatment of distal femur fractures using the less invasive stabilization system: surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(8):509–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoskins W, Sheehy R, Edwards ER, Hau RC, Bucknill A, Parsons N, et al. Nails or plates for fracture of the distal femur? Data from the Victoria Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry. Bone Joint J. 2016;98(6):846–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schütz M, Müller M, Regazzoni P, Höntzsch D, Krettek C, Van der Werken C, et al. Use of the less invasive stabilization system (LISS) in patients with distal femoral (AO33) fractures: a prospective multicenter study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125(2):102–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weight M, Collinge C. Early results of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur (AO/OTA types A2, A3, C2, and C3). J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(8):503–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schandelmaier P, Partenheimer A, Koenemann B, Grün OA, Krettek C. Distal femoral fractures and LISS stabilization. Injury. 2001;32:55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Higgins TF, Pittman G, Hines J, Bachus KN. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(1):43–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ricci WM, Streubel PN, Morshed S, Collinge CA, Nork SE, Gardner MJ. Risk factors for failure of locked plate fixation of distal femur fractures: an analysis of 335 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(2):83–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Henderson CE, Lujan T, Bottlang M, Fitzpatrick DC, Madey SM, Marsh JL. Stabilization of distal femur fractures with intramedullary nails and locking plates: differences in callus formation. Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Beltran MJ, Gary JL, Collinge CA. Management of distal femur fractures with modern plates and nails: state of the art. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(4):165–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bottlang M, Lesser M, Koerber J, Doornink J, von Rechenberg B, Augat P, et al. Far cortical locking can improve healing of fractures stabilized with locking plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(7):1652.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Crist BD, Della Rocca GJ, Murtha YM. Treatment of acute distal femur fractures. Orthopedics. 2008;31(7).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gardner MJ, Griffith MH, Demetrakopoulos D, Brophy RH, Grose A, Helfet DL, et al. Hybrid locked plating of osteoporotic fractures of the humerus. JBJS. 2006;88(9):1962–7.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Freeman AL, Tornetta P III, Schmidt A, Bechtold J, Ricci W, Fleming M. How much do locked screws add to the fixation of “hybrid” plate constructs in osteoporotic bone? J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(3):163–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Singh AK, Rastogi A, Singh V. Biomechanical comparison of dynamic condylar screw and locking compression plate fixation in unstable distal femoral fractures: an in vitro study. Indian J Orthop. 2013;47(6):615.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Stoffel K, Lorenz K-U, Kuster MS. Biomechanical considerations in plate osteosynthesis: the effect of plate-to-bone compression with and without angular screw stability. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(6):362–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wilkens KJ, Curtiss S, Lee MA. Polyaxial locking plate fixation in distal femur fractures: a biomechanical comparison. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(9):624–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Campana V, Ciolli G, Cazzato G, Giovannetti De Sanctis E, Vitiello C, Leone A, et al. Treatment of distal femur fractures with VA-LCP condylar plate: a single trauma centre experience. Injury. 2019;S0020138319306849.

    Google Scholar 

  38. McDonald TC, Lambert JJ, Hulick RM, Graves ML, Russell GV, Spitler CA, et al. Treatment of Distal Femur Fractures With the DePuy-Synthes Variable Angle Locking Compression Plate. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(9):432–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tank JC, Schneider PS, Davis E, Galpin M, Prasarn ML, Choo AM, et al. Early mechanical failures of the synthes variable angle locking distal femur plate. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Jan;30(1):e7–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Henderson CE, Kuhl LL, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL. Locking plates for distal femur fractures: is there a problem with fracture healing? J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25:S8–S14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cui S, Bledsoe JG, Israel H, Watson JT, Cannada LK. Locked plating of comminuted distal femur fractures: does unlocked screw placement affect stability and failure? J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(2):90–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Harvin WH, Oladeji LO, Della Rocca GJ, Murtha YM, Volgas DA, Stannard JP, et al. Working length and proximal screw constructs in plate osteosynthesis of distal femur fractures. Injury. 2017;48(11):2597–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Märdian S, Schaser K-D, Duda GN, Heyland M. Working length of locking plates determines interfragmentary movement in distal femur fractures under physiological loading. Clin Biomech. 2015;30(4):391–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lujan TJ, Henderson CE, Madey SM, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL, Bottlang M. Locked plating of distal femur fractures leads to inconsistent and asymmetric callus formation. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(3):156–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Heyland M, Duda GN, Haas NP, Trepczynski A, Döbele S, Höntzsch D, et al. Semi-rigid screws provide an auxiliary option to plate working length to control interfragmentary movement in locking plate fixation at the distal femur. Injury. 2015;46:S24–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Doornink J, Fitzpatrick DC, Madey SM, Bottlang M. Far cortical locking enables flexible fixation with periarticular locking plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(Suppl 1):S29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Adams JD Jr, Tanner SL, Jeray KJ. Far cortical locking screws in distal femur fractures. Orthopedics. 2015;38(3):e153–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bottlang M, Fitzpatrick DC, Sheerin D, Kubiak E, Gellman R, Zandschulp CV, et al. Dynamic fixation of distal femur fractures using far cortical locking screws: a prospective observational study. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(4):181–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Galal S. Dynamic locked plating for fixation of distal femur fractures using near-cortical over-drilling: preliminary results of a prospective observational study. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017;8(3):215–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Rodriguez EK, Zurakowski D, Herder L, Hall A, Walley KC, Weaver MJ, et al. Mechanical construct characteristics predisposing to non-union after locked lateral plating of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(8):403–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hak DJ, Mauffrey C, Seligson D, Lindeque B. Use of carbon-fiber-reinforced composite implants in orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics. 2014;37(12):825–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mitchell PM, Lee AK, Collinge CA, Ziran BH, Hartley KG, Jahangir AA. Early comparative outcomes of carbon fiber–reinforced polymer plate in the fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(8):386–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Schmidt U, Penzkofer R, Bachmaier S, Augat P. Implant material and design alter construct stiffness in distal femur locking plate fixation: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(9):2808–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Peschiera V, Staletti L, Cavanna M, Saporito M, Berlusconi M. Predicting the failure in distal femur fractures. Injury. 2018;49:S2–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sain A, Sharma V, Farooque K. Dual plating of the distal femur: indications and surgical techniques. Cureus. 2019;11(12):e6483.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Briffa N, Karthickeyan R, Jacob J, Khaleel A. Comminuted supracondylar femoral fractures: a biomechanical analysis comparing the stability of medial versus lateral plating in axial loading. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2016;11(3):187–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Park K-H, Oh C-W, Park I-H, Kim J-W, Lee J-H, Kim H-J. Additional fixation of medial plate over the unstable lateral locked plating of distal femur fractures: a biomechanical study. Injury. 2019;50(10):1593–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang W, Li J, Zhang H, Wang M, Li L, Zhou J, et al. Biomechanical assessment of single LISS versus double-plate osteosynthesis in the AO type 33-C2 fractures: a finite element analysis. Injury. 2018;49(12):2142–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang J, Wei Y, Yin W, Shen Y, Cao S. Biomechanical and clinical comparison of single lateral plate and double plating of comminuted supracondylar femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Belg. 2018;84:141–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Bai Z, Gao S, Hu Z, Liang A. Comparison of clinical efficacy of lateral and lateral and medial double-plating fixation of distal femoral fractures. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sun R, Zhang Y, Yu Z. Clinical efficacy of augmented medial assisted plate for treating comminuted metaphyseal fracture of the distal femur. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2018;11(4):3859–65.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Holzman MA, Hanus BD, Munz JW, O’Connor DP, Brinker MR. Addition of a medial locking plate to an in situ lateral locking plate results in healing of distal femoral nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(6):1498–505.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Rajasekaran RB, Jayaramaraju D, Palanisami DR, Agraharam D, Perumal R, Kamal A, et al. A surgical algorithm for the management of recalcitrant distal femur nonunions based on distal femoral bone stock, fracture alignment, medial void, and stability of fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(8):1057–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Ziran B, Rohde R, Wharton A. Lateral and anterior plating of intra-articular distal femoral fractures treated via an anterior approach. Int Orthop. 2002;26(6):370–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Pekmezci M, McDonald E, Buckley J, Kandemir U. Retrograde intramedullary nails with distal screws locked to the nail have higher fatigue strength than locking plates in the treatment of supracondylar femoral fractures: a cadaver-based laboratory investigation. Bone Joint J. 2014;96(1):114–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Cieślik P, Piekarczyk P, Marczyński W. Results of retrograde intramedullary nailing for distal femoral fractures–own experience. Orthop Traumatol Rehabil. 2007;9(6):612–7.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Henry SL. Supracondylar femur fractures treated percutaneously. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;375:51–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Hartin NL, Harris I, Hazratwala K. RETROGRADE NAILING VERSUS FIXED-ANGLE BLADE PLATING FOR SUPRACONDYLAR FEMORAL FRACTURES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76(5):290–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Wu C-C, Shih C-H. Treatment of femoral supracondylar unstable comminuted fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1992;111(4):232–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Markmiller M, Konrad G, Südkamp N. Femur–LISS and distal femoral nail for fixation of distal femoral fractures: are there differences in outcome and complications? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:252–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Shah JK, Szukics P, Gianakos AL, Liporace FA, Yoon RS. Equivalent union rates between intramedullary nail and locked plate fixation for distal femur periprosthetic fractures–a systematic review. Injury. 2020;51(4):1062–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Hierholzer C, von Rüden C, Pötzel T, Woltmann A, Bühren V. Outcome analysis of retrograde nailing and less invasive stabilization system in distal femoral fractures: a retrospective analysis. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45(3):243–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Chen S-H, Chiang M-C, Hung C-H, Lin S-C, Chang H-W. Finite element comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing and locking plate fixation with/without an intramedullary allograft for distal femur fracture following total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2014;21(1):224–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL, Koenig SJ, Tornetta P III. Outcome of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following knee arthroplasty. Injury. 2012;43(7):1084–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Ricci WM, Loftus T, Cox C, Borrelli J. Locked plates combined with minimally invasive insertion technique for the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(3):190–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Han H-S, Oh K-W, Kang S-B. Retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2009;1(4):201–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Liporace FA, Yoon RS. Nail plate combination technique for native and periprosthetic distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(2):e64–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Başcı O. Combination of anatomical locking plate and retrograde intramedullary nail in distal femoral fractures: comparison of mechanical stability. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2015;26(1):21–6.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Attum B, Douleh D, Whiting PS, White-Dzuro GA, Dodd AC, Shen MS, et al. Outcomes of distal femur nonunions treated with a combined nail/plate construct and autogenous bone grafting. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(9):e301–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Hart GP, Kneisl JS, Springer BD, Patt JC, Karunakar MA. Open reduction vs distal femoral replacement arthroplasty for comminuted distal femur fractures in the patients 70 years and older. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(1):202–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Streubel PN, Ricci WM, Wong A, Gardner MJ. Mortality after distal femur fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(4):1188–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Appleton P, Moran M, Houshian S, Robinson CM. Distal femoral fractures treated by hinged total knee replacement in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(8):1065–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Atrey A, Hussain N, Gosling O, Giannoudis P, Shepherd A, Young S, et al. A 3 year minimum follow up of Endoprosthetic replacement for distal femoral fractures—an alternative treatment option. J Orthop. 2017;14(1):216–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Jassim SS, McNamara I, Hopgood P. Distal femoral replacement in periprosthetic fracture around total knee arthroplasty. Injury. 2014;45(3):550–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivek Trikha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Trikha, V., Gupta, A. (2023). Implantology of Fractures of the Distal Femur. In: Banerjee, A., Biberthaler, P., Shanmugasundaram, S. (eds) Handbook of Orthopaedic Trauma Implantology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7540-0_81

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7540-0_81

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7539-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7540-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics