Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Changing Fracture Classifications in the Age of Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Imaging

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Orthopaedic Trauma Implantology

  • 32 Accesses

Abstract

Fractures of bones are one of the most common orthopedic injuries and can result from both low-energy and high-energy trauma. With advancements in technology, diagnostic tools have also improved. Computed tomography (CT) has asserted its presence in the assessment of fractures, in addition to conventional radiographs, for three-dimensional understanding of fractures and accurate planning of surgeries. Corresponding advancements have also happened in implant designs, enabling accurate and stronger fixation of periarticular fractures. Newer imaging tools have further enhanced the reproducibility of fracture patterns and boosted evolution of newer classifications. Understanding the basis of these newer classification systems is important in order to benefit the patient clinically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Borgström F, Karlsson L, Ortsäter G, Norton N, Halbout P, Cooper C, Lorentzon M, McCloskey EV, Harvey NC, Javaid MK, Kanis JA. Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities. Arch Osteoporos. 2020;15(1):1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Joeris A, Höglinger M, Meier F, Knöfler F, Scholz S, Brügger U, Denk E, Gutzwiller F, Prein J, Renner N, Eichler K. The impact of the AO Foundation on fracture care: an evaluation of 60 years AO Foundation. Injury. 2019;50(11):1868–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ehlke M. 3d reconstruction of anatomical structures from 2d X-ray images. Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität Berlin. 2021

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mitsuishi M, Sugita N, Fujiwara K, Abe N, Ozaki T, Suzuki M, Moriya H, Inoue T, Kuramoto K, Nakashima Y, Tanimoto K. Development of a medical CAD/CAM system for orthopedic surgery. CIRP Ann. 2007;56(1):405–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Durkee NJ, Jacobson J. Classification of common acetabular fractures: radiographic and CT appearances. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(4):915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alexandre M, Polesello GC, Cavassani E, Rabelo ND, Queiroz MC, Ricioli W. Does computed tomography improve reproducibility in the classification of transtrochanteric fractures? Rev Bras Ortop. 2019;54:361–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Seinsheimer F 3rd. Fractures of the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;153:169–79. PMID: 7449211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li R, Zhuge Y, Zhan Y, Xie X, Luo C. Three-dimensional computed tomography mapping and analysis of distal femur fractures (AO/OTA types 33A, 33B, and 33C). Ann Transl Med. 2022;10(7):398. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-4591. PMID: 35530952; PMCID: PMC9073806.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chandrabose R, Saha S, Kumar H, Tapadiya N, Hd B. A computed tomography-based classification of Hoffa fracture: surgical treatment considerations and prognostic outcome with assessment of reproducibility. J Orthop. 2019;18(20):21–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2019.12.011. PMID: 32021051; PMCID: PMC6994825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bagaria V, Sharma G, Waghchoure C, Chandak RM, Nemade A, Tadepelli K, Pawar P. A proposed radiological classification system of Hoffa’s fracture based on fracture configuration and consequent optimal treatment strategy along with the review of literature. SICOT J. 2019;5:18. https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2019016. Epub 2019 Jun 7. PMID: 31180317; PMCID: PMC6557153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chan PS, Klimkiewicz JJ, Luchetti WT, Esterhai JL, Kneeland JB, Dalinka MK, Heppenstall RB. Impact of CT scan on treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(7):484–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yacoubian SV, Nevins RT, Sallis JG, Potter HG, Lorich DG. Impact of MRI on treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16(9):632–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schatzker J, Mcbroom R, Bruce D. The tibial plateau fracture: the Toronto experience 1968–1975. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1976–2007). 1979;138:94–104.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Luo CF, Sun H, Zhang B, Zeng BF. Three-column fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(11):683–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu Y, Yang G, Luo C-F, Smith WR, Hu C-F. Computed tomography-based Three-Column Classification in tibial plateau fractures, Introduction of its utility and assessment of its reproducibility. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(3):731–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang SM, Hu SJ, Du SC. Four-quadrant/column classification of tibial plateau fractures. Int Orthop (SICOT). 2018;42:725–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Molenaars RJ, Mellema JJ, Doornberg JN, Kloen P. Tibial plateau fracture characteristics: computed tomography mapping of lateral, medial, and bicondylar fractures. JBJS. 2015;97(18):1512–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kfuri M, Schatzker J. Revisiting the Schatzker classification of tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2018;49(12):2252–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jian Z, Ao R, Zhou J, et al. A new anatomic locking plate for the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19:319.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tao J, Hang DH, Wang QG, Gao W, Zhu LB, Wu XF. The posterolateral shearing tibial plateau fracture: treatment and results via a modified posterolateral approach. Knee. 2008;15(6):473–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Frosch KH, Balcarek P, Walde T, Stürmer KM. A new posterolateral approach without fibula osteotomy for the treatment of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(8):515–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rohra N, Suri HS, Gangrade K. Functional and radiological outcome of Schatzker type V and VI tibial plateau fracture treatment with dual plates with minimum 3 years follow-up: a prospective study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(5):RC05–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hake ME, Goulet JA. Open reduction and internal fixation of the posteromedial tibial plateau via the Lobenhoffer approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30:S35–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jian Z, Ao R-g, Zhou J-h, Yu B-q. Modified anatomic locking plate for the treatment of posteromedial tibial plateau fractures. Orthop Surg. 2020;12:1605.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanders R, Fortin P, DiPasquale T, Walling A. Operative treatment in 120 displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Results using a prognostic computed tomography scan classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;(290):87–95. PMID: 8472475.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nolan BM, Sweet SJ, Ferkel E, Udofia AA, Itamura J. The role of computed tomography in evaluating intra-articular distal humerus fractures. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015;44(9):E326–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jupiter JB, Mehne DK. Fractures of the distal humerus. Orthopedics. 1992;15(7):825–33. https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-19920701-07. PMID: 1630966.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Matsushigue T, Pagliaro V, Rafael F. Do computed tomography and its 3D reconstruction increase the reproducibility of classifications of fractures of the proximal extremity of the humerus? Rev Bras Ortop. 2014;49(02):174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Jacquot A, Gauci MO, Chaoui J. Proper benefit of a three dimensional pre-operative planning software for glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop (SICOT). 2018;42:2897–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Melone CP Jr. Articular fractures of the distal radius. Orthop Clin North Am. 1984;15(2):217–36. PMID: 6728444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Frykman G. Fracture of the distal radius including sequelae-shoulder–handfinger syndrome, disturbance in the distal radio-ulnar joint and impairment of nerve function: a clinical and experimental study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1967;38(suppl 108):1–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brink PR, Rikli DA. Four-corner concept: CT-based assessment of fracture patterns in distal radius. J Wrist Surg. 2016;5(2):147–51. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570462. Epub 2016 Jan 25. PMID: 27104082; PMCID: PMC4838463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hintringer W, Rosenauer R, Pezzei C, Quadlbauer S, Jurkowitsch J, Keuchel T, Hausner T, Leixnering M, Krimmer H. Biomechanical considerations on a CT-based treatment-oriented classification in radius fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140(5):595–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03405-7. Epub 2020 Mar 19. PMID: 32193681; PMCID: PMC7181558.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sri Aurobindo Medical College and PG Institute, Indore, India

    Arjun Jain

  2. Sri Lakshmi Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India

    S. Samundeeswari & Saseendar Shanmugasundaram

  3. International Training Fellow (Hip & Knee)-Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, England

    Debabrata Kumar

Authors
  1. Arjun Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Samundeeswari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saseendar Shanmugasundaram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Debabrata Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saseendar Shanmugasundaram .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. NH Narayana Superspeciality and Multispeciality Hospitals, Howrah, West Bengal, India

    Arindam Banerjee

  2. Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

    Peter Biberthaler

  3. Sri Lakshmi Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India

    Saseendar Shanmugasundaram

Section Editor information

  1. Orthopaedic Surgery, NH Narayana Superspeciality and Multispeciality Hospitals, Howrah, West Bengal, India

    Arindam Banerjee

  2. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, England

    Debabrata Kumar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Jain, A., Samundeeswari, S., Shanmugasundaram, S., Kumar, D. (2023). Changing Fracture Classifications in the Age of Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Imaging. In: Banerjee, A., Biberthaler, P., Shanmugasundaram, S. (eds) Handbook of Orthopaedic Trauma Implantology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7540-0_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7540-0_57

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7539-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7540-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation