Skip to main content

Defining the Clinical and Radiological Endpoint of a Successfully Fixed Fracture

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Orthopaedic Trauma Implantology

Abstract

Bone healing is a complex biological process involving various anatomical and mechanical events along with expression of various genes, allowing changes in cells and leading to fracture union. There are primarily two ways the bone heals; primary bone healing and secondary bone healing. Primary bone healing in other words is direct intramembranous healing whereas the indirect bone healing involves both intramembranous and enchondral bone formation. In a well-fixed fracture, the bone is expected to heal with direct bone healing as the bone is anatomically reduced and fixation provides stable environment. We discuss the endpoint for a successful fixation based on clinical examination and radiological support.

Fracture union remains largely a clinical diagnosis. The triad of displacement, stability, and biology dictates fracture union. In a well-fixed fracture, radiological tests provide little evidence on healing line cutting cone mechanism. Pain, weight-bearing status, and clinical examination remain the tool of choice for surgeons in decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Perren SM. Fracture healing: fracture healing understood as the result of a fascinating cascade of physical and biological interactions. Part I. An Attempt to Integrate Observations from 30 Years AO Research. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cechoslov. 2014;81(6):355–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhandari M, Fong K, Sprague S, Williams D, Petrisor B. Variability in the definition and perceived causes of delayed unions and nonunions: a cross-sectional, multinational survey of orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(15):e109-1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhandari M, Wasserman S, Yurgin N, Petrisor B, Sprague S, Dent R. Development and preliminary validation of a Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT). Can J Surg. 2013;56(5):E114–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hammer RR, Hammerby S, Lindholm B. Accuracy of radiologic assessment of tibial shaft fracture union in humans. Clin Orthop. 1985;(199):233–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Corrales LA, Morshed S, Bhandari M, Miclau T. Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(9):1862–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lane JM, Sandhu HS. Current approaches to experimental bone grafting. Orthop Clin North Am. 1987;18(2):213–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Whelan DB, Bhandari M, Stephen D, Kreder H, McKee MD, Zdero R, et al. Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation. J Trauma. 2010;68(3):629–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Litrenta J, Tornetta P, Mehta S, Jones C, OʼToole RV, Bhandari M, et al. Determination of radiographic healing: an assessment of consistency using RUST and modified RUST in metadiaphyseal fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(11):516–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Perlepe V, Cerato A, Putineanu D, Bugli C, Heynen G, Omoumi P, et al. Value of a radiographic score for the assessment of healing of nailed femoral and tibial shaft fractures: a retrospective preliminary study. Eur J Radiol. 2018;98:36–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhandari M, Chiavaras M, Ayeni O, Chakraverrty R, Parasu N, Choudur H, et al. Assessment of radiographic fracture healing in patients with operatively treated femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27(9):e213–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. on behalf of the FAITH Investigators, Frank T, Osterhoff G, Sprague S, Garibaldi A, Bhandari M, et al. The radiographic union score for hip (RUSH) identifies radiographic nonunion of femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(6):1396–404.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhandari M, Chiavaras MM, Parasu N, Choudur H, Ayeni O, Chakravertty R, et al. Radiographic union score for hip substantially improves agreement between surgeons and radiologists. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14(1):70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel SP, Anthony SG, Zurakowski D, Didolkar MM, Kim PS, Wu JS, et al. Radiographic scoring system to evaluate union of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(8):1471–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Spencer R. The effect of head injury on fracture healing. A quantitative assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69:525–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oni OO, Dunning J, Mobbs RJ, Gregg PJ. Clinical factors and the size of the external callus in tibial shaft fractures. Clin Orthop. 1991;(273):278–83.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Joslin CC, Hardy JRW, Cunningham JL. Quantification of fracture healing from radiographs using the maximum callus index. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(8):1986–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Salih S, Dennison M, Blakey C, Chan D, McGregor-Riley JC, Royston SL, et al. The callus fracture sign: a radiological predictor of progression to hypertrophic non-union in diaphyseal tibial fractures. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2015;10(3):149–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Perlepe V, Omoumi P, Larbi A, Putineanu D, Dubuc J-E, Schubert T, et al. Can we assess healing of surgically treated long bone fractures on radiograph? Diagn Interv Imaging. 2018;99(6):381–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhattacharyya T, Bouchard KA, Phadke A, Meigs JB, Kassarjian A, Salamipour H. The accuracy of computed tomography for the diagnosis of tibial nonunion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(4):692–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grigoryan M, Lynch JA, Fierlinger AL, Guermazi A, Fan B, MacLean DB, et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of closed fracture healing using computed tomography and conventional radiography. Acad Radiol. 2003;10(11):1267–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Srinivasan, S., Bishnoi, A., Ramsingh, V.K. (2023). Defining the Clinical and Radiological Endpoint of a Successfully Fixed Fracture. In: Banerjee, A., Biberthaler, P., Shanmugasundaram, S. (eds) Handbook of Orthopaedic Trauma Implantology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7540-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7540-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7539-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7540-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics