Skip to main content

An Ethic of Care: Contributions to Social Work Practice

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Social Work Theory and Ethics

Part of the book series: Social Work ((SOWO))

  • 1580 Accesses

Abstract

The definition of the term philosophy is ‘love of wisdom’. From the earliest of times, in all cultures and traditions, the search for meaning and knowledge has been accompanied by a passing on through generations of ways that meaning can be made and connections drawn or discarded. The oral histories steeped in ancient ancestry of Indigenous peoples, and the written tomes that have influenced many a religious, spiritual, and belief system, all have their place in establishing a moral philosophy and body of ethical theory that provides rich fodder for those who seek explanations and answers to the compelling questions of life. This chapter focuses on tracing the history, defining and understanding the central tenets of what has become known as an Ethic of Care. This relational ethical theory had its roots in feminist thinking in the mid-twentieth century providing a critical understanding of the importance of interdependence and relationship while maintaining focus on the situational, structural, and political factors of importance to the individual. While ethics of justice highlight obligations, rights, and fairness, an Ethic of Care focuses on reciprocity, relationships, connections, and context. This chapter positions an Ethic of Care as a central ethical theory for social work practice and provides examples of how questions about what a compassionate response requires can shift what ought to be done from a focus on rational-objective to the relational-emotional dimension. In doing so, social workers have a foundation for decision-making that holds them on firm footing when exploring moral obligations, deservedness, and the expectations about how social relations play out on all levels. A critical Ethic of Care will also be explored as a more recent development of this perspective that provides further application to the socio-political context of human relationships. The chapter concludes with two case studies of how an Ethic of Care approach can be applied in social work-related contexts, drawing on recent research and global events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnes M, Bennett G (1998) Frail bodies, courageous voices: older people influencing community care. Health Social Care Commun 6(2):102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes M, Brannelly T, Ward L, Ward N (eds) (2015) Ethics of care: critical advances in international perspective. Bristol University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddy J (2018) The politics of climate change. In: Pease B, Vreugdenhil A, Stanford S (eds) Critical ethics of care in social work. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozaleck V (2019) Towards response-able social work: diffracting care through justice. In: Marson S, McKinney R (eds) The Routledge handbook of social work ethics and values. Routledge, New York, pp 215–222

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Branicki L (2020) Covid-19, ethics of care, and feminist crisis management. Feminist Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12491

  • Chenoweth L, McAuliffe D (2020) The road to social work and human service practice, 6th edn. Cengage, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton S (2020) Hierarchies of power: disability theories and models and their implications for violence against, and abuse, neglect and exploitation of, people with disabilities. Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disabilities. Research Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw K (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ Chic Leg Forum 1(8):139–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw K (2017) On intersectionality: essential writings. Faculty Books:255. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/books/255

  • Day P (1979) Care and control: a social work dilemma. Soc Policy Adm 18(3):206–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone B, Morris K (2012) Feminist ethics of care. In: Gray M, Midgley J, Webb S (eds) The sage handbook of social work. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone B, White S, Morris K (2014) Reimagining child protection: towards humane social work with families. Policy Press, Bristol

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fine M, Tronto J (2020) Care goes viral: care theory and research confront the global COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Care Caring 4(3):301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser N (2008) Scales of justice: reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C (1982) In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2010) Moral sources and emergent ethical theories in social work. Br J Soc Work 40(6):1794–1811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton M (2020) Carers need respite from care: COVID-19’s limiting the options and pushing many to breaking point, Women’s Agenda. https://womensagenda.com.au/latest/soapbox/carers-need-respite-from-care-covid-19slimiting-the-options-pushing-many-to-breaking-point/

  • Hankivsky O (2014) Rethinking care ethics: on the promise and potential of an intersectional analysis. Am Polit Sci Rev 108(2):252–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harries M (2018) Protecting children within a relationship -based feminist ethic of care. In: Pease B, Vreugdenhil A, Stanford S (eds) Critical ethics of care in social work. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Held V (2006) The ethics of care: personal, political, global. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland S (2010) Looked after children and the ethic of care. Br J Soc Work 40(6):1664–1680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölscher D (2018) Caring for justice in a neo-liberal university. South Afr J Higher Educ 32:31–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugman R (2005) New approaches to ethics in the caring professions. Palgrave, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer N, Razavi S, Rodgers Y (2021) Feminist economic perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic. Fem Econ 27:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2021.1876906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittay EF (1999) Love’s labour: essays on women, equality and dependency. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittay EF (2021) Precarity, precariousness and disability. J Soc Philos 52(3):292–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koggel C, Orme J (2010) Care ethics: new theories and applications. Ethics Soc Welfare 4(2):109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd L (2006) A caring profession? The ethics of care and social work with older people. Br J Soc Work 36:1171–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonne B, Harries M, Featherstone B, Gray M (2015) Working ethically in child protection. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meagher G, Parton N (2004) Modernising social work and the ethics of care. Soc Work Society 2(1):28–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrovic VL, O’Matuna DP, Nola IA (2019) Ethics and floods: a systematic review. Disast Med Public Health Preparedness 13(4):817–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orange D (2011) The suffering stranger: hermeneutics for everyday clinical practice. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pease B, Goldingay S, Hosken N, Nipperess S (2016) Doing critical social work: transformative practices for social justice. Allen & Unwin, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease B, Vreugenhil A, Stanford S (2018) Critical ethics of care in social work: transforming the politics and practices of caring. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquero AR, Jennings WG, Knaul FM, Jemison E, Kaukinen C (2021) Domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis, J Crim Just, 74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2021.101806

  • Pullen Sansfacon A (2016) Ethics and feminist social work. In: Wendt S, Moulding N (eds) Contemporary feminisms in social work practice. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 40–51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rauhaus BM, Sibila D, Johnson A (2020) Addressing the increase of domestic violence and abuse during the COVID-19 pandemic: a need for empathy, care, and social equity in collaborative planning and responses. Am Rev Public Adm 50(6–7):668–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson F (1999) Globalising care: ethics, feminist theory and international relations. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission into Aged Care, Quality and Safety (2021) Final report. https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/publications/final-report

  • Sevenhuijsen S (1998) Citizenship and the ethics of care: feminist considerations on justice, morality and politics. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare T (2000) Help. Venture Press, Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare T (2013) Disability rights and wrongs revisited. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw J (2018) Introducing post-secular social work: towards a post-liberal ethics of care. Br J Soc Work 48(2):412–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth R (2018) Critical engagements with the politics of care and disability. In: Pease B, Vreugdenhil A, Stanford S (eds) Critical ethics of care in social work. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto JC (1993) Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto JC (2010) Creating caring institutions: politics, plurality and purpose. Ethics Soc Welfare 4(2):158–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronto JC (2013) Caring democracy: markets, equality, and justice. New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto JC (2015) Who cares?: how to reshape a democratic politics. Cornell University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ward L, Barnes M (2016) Transforming practice with older people through an ethic of care. Br J Soc Work 46(4):906–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waycott J, Kelly R, Baker S, Neves B, Thach K, Lederman R (2022) The role of staff in facilitating immersive virtual reality for enrichment in aged care: an ethic of care perspective. In: CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘22), April 29–May 5, 2022, New Orleans. ACM, New York, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501956

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt S, Moulding N (2016) Contemporary feminisms in social work practice. Taylor and Francis, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams F (2001) In and beyond new labour: towards a new political ethics of care. Crit Soc Policy 21(4):467–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna McAuliffe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

McAuliffe, D. (2023). An Ethic of Care: Contributions to Social Work Practice. In: Hölscher, D., Hugman, R., McAuliffe, D. (eds) Social Work Theory and Ethics. Social Work. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1015-9_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics