Skip to main content

Bladder Autoaugmentation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Neurourology

Abstract

Bladder augmentation is sometimes required for a poorly compliant bladder and/or a bladder with small capacity unresponsive to conservative measures. While augmentation with gastrointestinal segments is considered gold standard from an efficacy standpoint, it is associated with significant morbidity. Since much of the morbidity is related to gastrointestinal segment interposition in the urinary tract, various other alternative techniques like autoaugmentation have been described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P.C. Cartwright, B.W. Snow, Bladder autoaugmentation: Partial detrusor excision to augment the bladder without use of bowel. J. Urol. 142(4), 1050–1053 (1989)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. P.C. Cartwright, B.W. Snow, Bladder autoaugmentation: Early clinical experience. J. Urol. 142(2), 505–508 (1989)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. E.L. Hansen, G.M. Hvistendahl, Y.F. Rawashdeh, et al., Promising long-term outcome of bladder autoaugmentation in children with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. J. Urol. 190(5), 1869–1875 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. B.W. Snow, P.C. Cartwright, Bladder autoaugmentation. Urol. Clin. North Am. 23(2), 323–331 (1996)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. D.P. Poppas, R.G. Uzzo, R.G. Britanisky, et al., Laparoscopic laser assisted auto-augmentation of the pediatric neurogenic bladder: Early experience with urodynamic followup. J. Urol. 155(3), 1057–1060 (1996)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Mammen, K.C. Balaji, Robotic transperitoneal detrusor myotomy: Description of a novel technique. J. Endourol. 19(4), 476–479 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Subramaniam, Experience with detrusorotomy in children by open and robotic approach. World J. Urol. 38(8), 1869–1874 (2020)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Skobejko-Wlodarska, K. Strulak, P. Nachulewicz, et al., Bladder autoaugmentation in myelodysplastic children. Br. J. Urol. 81(3), 114–116 (1998)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Chrzan, P. Dik, A.J. Klijn, et al., Detrusorectomy reduces the need for augmentation and use of antimuscarinics in children with neuropathic bladder. J. Pediatr. Urol. 9(2), 193–198 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Y.F. Rawashdeh, T.M. Jørgensen, L.H. Olsen, et al., The outcome of detrusor myotomy in children with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. J. Urol. 171(6), 2654–2656 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Marte, D. Di Meglio, A.M. Cotrufo, et al., Long-term follow-up of autoaugmentation in myelodysplastic children. BJU Int. 89(9), 928–931 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. A.E. MacNeily, K. Afshar, G.U. Coleman, et al., Autoaugmentation by detrusor myotomy: Its lack of effectiveness in the management of congenital neuropathic bladder. J. Urol. 170(4), 1643–1646 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. X.G. Sun, R.Y. Wang, J.L. Xu, et al., Surgical outcomes of bladder augmentation: A comparison of three different augmentation procedures. World J. Clin. Cases 8(15), 3240–3248 (2020)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Stöhrer, G. Kramer, M. Goepel, et al., Bladder autoaugmentation in adult patients with neurogenic voiding dysfunction. Spinal Cord 35(7), 456–462 (1997)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. P.W. Veenboer, S. Nadorp, T.P. De Jong, et al., Enterocystoplasty vs detrusorectomy: Outcome in the adult with spina bifida. J. Urol. 189(3), 1066–1070 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. S.P. Kumar, P.H. Abrams, Detrusor myectomy: Long-term results with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. BJU Int. 96(3), 341–344 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. W.W. Leng, H.J. Blalock, W.H. Fredriksson, et al., Enterocystoplasty or detrusor myectomy? Comparison of indications and outcomes for bladder augmentation. J. Urol. 161(3), 758–763 (1999)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. P.C. Cartwright, Bladder autoaugmentation (partial detrusor myectomy)—Where does it stand after 2 decades? J. Urol. 190(5), 1643–1644 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. F.T. Rocha, H. Bruschini, J.A. Figueiredo, et al., Use of an inflatable silicone balloon improves the success rate of bladder autoaugmentation at long-term followup. J. Urol. 185(6), 2576–2581 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. D.A. Rivas, M.B. Chancellor, B. Huang, et al., Comparison of bladder rupture pressure after intestinal bladder augmentation (Ileocystoplasty) and myomyotomy (autoaugmentation). Urology 48(1), 40–46 (1996)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Vasudeva, P. (2022). Bladder Autoaugmentation. In: Liao, L., Madersbacher, H. (eds) Handbook of Neurourology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7939-1_42-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7939-1_42-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7939-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7939-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics