Skip to main content

Interdisciplinary and Interprofessional Partnerships: Mobilizing the Science of Learning to Impact Real-World Practice. The Australian Experience

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific

Abstract

The science of learning is a multidisciplinary field, which has much to contribute to our understanding of learning across the lifespan. Learning is a highly complex phenomenon, particularly when considering the diversity of learners, content, and learning contexts across the lifespan. Likewise, the research into learning and the teaching that supports it is similarly complex and diverse. While drawing on the key disciplines of the science of learning – neuroscience, psychology, and education – brings a holistic lens to understanding learning, it also brings challenges: challenges in crossing disciplinary boundaries and challenges in mobilizing this knowledge into unique educational contexts. This chapter will discuss some of the challenges of conducting and implementing multi- and interdisciplinary research and synthesize international literature that explores promising approaches to successful multidisciplinary research and its mobilization into practice. It will end with an illustration and some key learnings of successful multidisciplinary research and how it is engaging meaningfully with interprofessional partners to positively impact on learning across the lifespan. This chapter aims to highlight the many reasons why multidisciplinary and interprofessional cooperation should prevail, despite the challenges, and outline how and why this approach is important to shaping a new narrative for education and training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albers, B., Shlonsky, A., & Mildon, R. (2020). En route to implementation science 3.0. In Implementation science 3.0 (pp. 1–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03874-8_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership AITSL. (2014). Australian professional standards for teachers. http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/list

  • Best, A., & Holmes, B. J. (2010). Systems thinking, knowledge and action: Towards better models and methods. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 6(2), 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (2020). Chapter 8: What is the research brokerage role that can be played by social relationships? In Malin & C. Brown (Eds.), The role of knowledge brokers in education: Connecting the dots between research and practice. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, T., Leighton, V., Leggett, J., Krzensk, A., Adamson, R., Pollock, C., & MacMahon, S. (2022). The impact of a preparatory science of learning intervention in secondary schools’ contexts in Australia. Review of Education (Oxford), 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3340

  • Cantor, P., Osher, D., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2019). Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context. Applied Developmental Science, 23(4), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1398649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A., Gillies, R. M., Cunnington, R., McCarthy, M., Sherwell, C., Palghat, K., Goh, F., Baffour, B., Bourgeois, A., Rafter, M., & Seary, T. (2019). Changes in science attitudes, beliefs, knowledge and physiological arousal after implementation of a multimodal, cooperative intervention in primary school science classes. Information and Learning Science, 120(7/8), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-08-2018-0089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A., Sanders-O’Connor, E., Forrest, K., Fynes-Clinton, S., York, A., Ziaei, M., Flynn, L., Bower, J. M., & Reutens, D. (2021). Improving emotion regulation, well-being, and neuro-cognitive functioning in teachers: a matched controlled study comparing the mindfulness-based stress reduction and health enhancement programs. Mindfulness, 13(1), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01777-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W. R., & Geil, K. E. (2013). Research-practice partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts. William T. Grant Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203720967

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coldwell, M., Greany, T., Higgins, S., Brown, C., Maxwell, B., Stiell, B., … & Burns, H. (2017). Evidence-informed teaching: An evaluation of progress in England. Research report. July 2017, (DFE-RR696). Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. (2014). Knowledge mobilisation in education across Canada: A cross-case analysis of 44 research brokering organisations. Evidence and Policy, 10(1), 29–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., Levin, B., & Campbell, C. (2009). The growing (but still limited) importance of evidence in education policy and practice. Journal of Educational Change, 10, 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., Rodway, J., MacGregor, S., Shewchuk, S., & Searle, M. (2020). Chapter 7: Knowledge brokering. In Malin & C. Brown (Eds.), The role of knowledge brokers in education: Connecting the dots between research and practice (pp. 90–107). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creaby, C., & Haslam, J. (2020). Chapter 4: Evidence for the frontline. In J. Malin & C. Brown (Eds.), The role of knowledge brokers in education: Connecting the dots between research and practice (pp. 40–51). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, D. B. (2012). Promising principles: Translating the science of learning to educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 251–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, S. J., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Training. (2018). Through growth to achievement: The report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. Department of Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikker, S., Wan, L., Davidesco, I., Kaggen, L., Oostrik, M., McClintock, J., Rowland, J., Michalareas, G., Van Bavel, J. J., Ding, M., & Poeppel, D. (2017). Brain-to-brain synchrony tracks real-world dynamic group interactions in the classroom. Current Biology, 27(9), 1375–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley-Ripple, M. H., Karpyn, A., Tilley, K., & McDonough, K. (2018). Rethinking connections between research and practice in education: A conceptual framework. Educational Researcher, 47(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18761042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K. W. (2009). Mind, brain, and education: Building a scientific groundwork for learning and teaching. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, S., See, B. H., & Siddiqui, N. (2020). What is the evidence on the best way to get evidence into use in education? Review of Education (Oxford), 8(2), 570–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (2006). Neuroscience and education: From research to practice? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 406–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. W., Ottoson, J. M., Garcia, C., & Hiatt, R. A. (2009). Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization and integration in public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 30(1), 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays, R. T. (2006). The science of learning: A systems theory approach. Brown Walker Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, C., Nicholas, R. E., Keller, K., Forest, C. E., & Tuana, N. (2022). Attention to values helps shape convergence research. Climatic Change, 170(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbiss, M. H., Massonnié, J., Tokuhama-Espinosa, T., Gittner, A., Sousa, L., Arson, M., Tovazzi, A., Hindley, C., Baker, S., Sumeracki, M. A., Wassenaar, T., & Gous, I. (2019). “UNIFIED”: Bridging the researcher–practitioner divide in mind, brain, and education. Mind, Brain and Education, 13(4), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(12), 817–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Jones, P. A., Varma, S., Ansari, D., Butterworth, B., De Smedt, B., Goswami, U., Laurillard, D., & Thomas, M. S. C. (2016). The Principles and Practices of Educational Neuroscience: Comment on Bowers, 123(5), 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joram, E., Gabriele, A. J., & Walton, K. (2020). What influences teachers’ “buy-in” of research? Teachers’ beliefs about the applicability of educational research to their practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin. (2013). To know is not enough: Research knowledge and its use. Review of Education (Oxford), 1(1), 2–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, J. (2007). The in-between world of knowledge brokering. British Medical Journal, 334, 129–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lysenko, L. V., Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Dagenais, C., & Janosz, M. (2014). Educational research in educational practice: Predictors of use. Canadian Journal of Education, 37(2), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMahon, S., Leggett, J., & Carroll, A. (2022). Partnering to learn: A collaborative approach to research translation for educators and researchers. Mind, Brain and Education. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mbe.12317

  • Malin, J., & Brown, C. (2020). The role of knowledge brokers in education: Connecting the dots between research and practice. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansilla, V. B., & Gardner, H. (2005). Assessing interdisciplinary work at the frontier. An empirical exploration of ‘symptoms of quality’. Rethinking Interdisciplinarity, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matusz, P. J., Dikker, S., Huth, A. G., & Perrodin, C. (2018). Are we ready for real-world neuroscience? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(3), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_e_01276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. (2013). Educational design research. In M. Spector, D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 131–140). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, Z. P., Neal, J. W., Lawlor, J. A., & Mills, K. J. (2015). Small worlds or world apart? Using network theory to understand the research-practice gap. Psychosocial Intervention, 24, 177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council). (2014). Convergence: Facilitating transdisciplinary integration of life sciences, physical sciences, engineering, and beyond. The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palinkas, L. A., & Soydan, H. (2012). New horizons of translational research and research translation in social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(1), 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peek, L., Tobin, J., Adams, R. M., Wu, H., & Mathews, M. C. (2020). A framework for convergence research in the hazards and disaster field: The natural hazards engineering research infrastructure CONVERGE facility. Frontiers in Built Environment, 6, 110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, M., & Vivanet, G. (2021). Evidence-based policies in education: initiatives and challenges in Europe. ECNU Review of Education, 4(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120924670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornow, J. S., Kurose, J., Lewis, W. J., Tilbury, D. M., Easterling, W. E., Iacono, C. S., Keiser, R. L., Kinney, A., & Cook, F. (2018). Dear colleague letter: Growing convergence research. National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Atteveldt, N., van Kesteren, M. T. R., Braams, B., & Krabbendam, L. (2018). Neuroimaging of learning and development: Improving ecological validity. Frontline Learning Research, 6(3), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v6i3.366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Atteveldt, N., Tijsma, G., Janssen, T., & Kupper, F. (2019). Responsible research and innovation as a novel approach to guide educational impact of mind, brain, and education research. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(4), 279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, Y., Sumeracki, M., & Caviglioli, O. (2019). Understanding how we learn: A visual guide. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentworth, L., Mazzeo, C., & Connolly, F. (2017). Research practice partnerships: A strategy for promoting evidence-based decision-making in education. Educational Research, 59(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2017.1314108

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie MacMahon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

MacMahon, S., Carroll, A. (2023). Interdisciplinary and Interprofessional Partnerships: Mobilizing the Science of Learning to Impact Real-World Practice. The Australian Experience. In: Lee, W.O., Brown, P., Goodwin, A.L., Green, A. (eds) International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2327-1_124-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2327-1_124-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2327-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2327-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics