Abstract
Ageism and ableism, two critical concepts in aging, disability studies, and gerontological research, have significant parallels in their social identity and construction. Depending on the approach, context, and application, they appear to be interdependent, interrelated, or disparate conceptually and tangibly. The literature connecting and discussing ageism and disability is fragmented and includes a range of terminologies, concepts, learnings, and applications, and raises challenges in understanding and contextualization. Socially created identities include gender, ethnicity, caste, class, and age. These identities are socially created, reinforced, and sustained through societal normative norms, relations, and practice. Researchers often define these identities as having a biological basis or a substratum on which the social identity rests. Though a disabled person’s identity is socially acquired, the bodily impairment is considered to reflect the biological identity. Similarly, the biological base for an older person is universally thought to be reflected by his tangible age identity, which utilizes the number of years lived. The recognition of ageism is currently reviving research interests on ableism. Though it may seem plausible to consider impairment the biological foundation for a disability that results in experiencing ableism and that old age becomes the biological foundation for aging leading to the experience of ageism—the idea of a social identity built upon a biological substratum has its inherent flaws. This chapter delves into how identities of ableism and ageism exist or operate as interconnected, intertwined, entwined, or disparate entities. Through a critical discourse analysis of sociological and gerontological literature on ageism and disability (ableism, in particular) and through discussing intersecting themes of ableism and ageism, this synthesis explores whether the natural tendency to judge people based on age and functionality leads to ageism and ableism being widely stereotyped and whether ageism is, in fact, part ableism. The study emphasizes that one of the main challenges lies in the intersection between age categorizations on the one hand and functional or cognitive abilities on the other. These deservedly are discussed in deeper detail while debating, identifying, and acknowledging the multi-level and intersectional relationship between ableism and ageism. The chapter offers future research directions and urges deeper exploration into the intersectional nature of ableism and ageism for the global context and for India in particular.
References
Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999). The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science & Medicine, 48(8), 977–988.
Azulai, A. (2014). Ageism and future cohorts of elderly: Implications for social work. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 11(2), 2–12.
Barton, L., & Oliver, M. (Eds.). (1997). Disability studies: Past, present and future (pp. ix–xiv). Disability Press.
Basu, S., & King, A. C. (2013). Disability and chronic disease among older adults in India: Detecting vulnerable populations through the WHO SAGE study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 178(11), 1620–1628.
Bendukurthi, N., & Raman, U. (2019). What’s it all worth?: The political economy of disability representation in indian media. In The routledge companion to disability and media (pp. 23–34). Routledge.
Boehm, S. A., Kunze, F., & Bruch, H. (2014). Spotlight on age-diversity climate: The impact of age-inclusive HR policies on firm-level outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 667–704.
Butler, R. N. (1969). Age-ism: Another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist, 9(4_Part_1), 243–246.
Campbell, F. A. (2001). Inciting legal fictions: ‘Disability’s’ date with ontology and the ableist body of the law. Griffith Law Review, 10, 42.
Campbell, F. (2009). Contours of ableism: The production of disability and abledness. Springer.
Carlson, L. (2010). The faces of intellectual disability. Indiana University Press.
Chandramouli, C., & General, R. (2011). Census of india. Rural urban distribution of population, provisional population total. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India.
Cichy, K. E., Li, J., McMahon, B. T., & Rumrill, P. D. (2015). The workplace discrimination experiences of older workers with disabilities: Results from the national EEOC ADA research project. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 43(2), 137–148.
Gadow, S. (1983). Frailty and strength: The dialectic in aging. The Gerontologist, 23(2), 144–147.
Gibbons, H. M. (2016). Compulsory youthfulness: Intersections of ableism and ageism in “successful aging” discourses. Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 12(2 & 3), 70–88.
Giddens, A. (2006). Sociology. Polity.
Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2010). Aging without agency: Theorizing the fourth age. Aging & Mental Health, 14(2), 121–128.
Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/ability studies: Theorising disablism and ableism. Routledge.
Gutterman, A. (2022). Ageism and disability. Available at SSRN 3936792.
Harris, K., Krygsman, S., Waschenko, J., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2018). Ageism and the older worker: A scoping review. The Gerontologist, 58(2), e1–e14.
Higgs, P., & Gilleard, C. (2015). Fitness and consumerism in later life. In Physical activity and sport in later life: Critical perspectives (pp. 32–42). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Higgs, P., & Gilleard, C. (2020). The ideology of ageism versus the social imaginary of the fourth age: Two differing approaches to the negative contexts of old age. Ageing & Society, 40(8), 1617–1630.
Jammaers, E., Zanoni, P., & Williams, J. (2021). Not all fish are equal: A Bourdieuan analysis of ableism in a financial services company. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(11), 2519–2544.
Jönson, H., & Larsson, A. T. (2009). The exclusion of older people in disability activism and policies a case of inadvertent ageism? Journal of Ageing Studies, 23(1), 69–77.
Jönson, H., & Taghizadeh Larsson, A. (2022). Ableism and ageism. In Encyclopedia of gerontology and population aging (pp. 4–9). Springer International Publishing.
Kane, R. L., Priester, R., & Neumann, D. (2007). Does disparity in the way disabled older adults are treated imply ageism? The Gerontologist, 47(3), 271–279.
Kaplan, D. (1999). The definition of disability. The Center for an Accessible Society–World Institute on Disability.
Khan, Z. A., Singh, C., & Khan, T. (2018). Correlates of physical disability in the elderly population of rural North India (Haryana). Journal of Family & Community Medicine, 25(3), 199.
Kulkarni, V. S., Kulkarni, V. S., & Gaiha, R. (2018). Aging, disability and disease in India. The University of Manchester.
Liebig, P. S., & Sheets, D. J. (1998). Ageism, disability, and access to environmental interventions. Technology and Disability, 8(1–2), 69–84.
Malik, M. A. (2022). Functional disability among older adults in India; a gender perspective. PLoS One, 17(9), e0273659.
McLaughlin, J. S., & Neumark, D. (2022). Gendered ageism and disablism and employment of older workers (No. w30355). National Bureau of Economic Research.
McMullin, J. A., & Shuey, K. M. (2006). Ageing, disability, and workplace accommodations. Ageing & Society, 26(6), 831–847.
Meekosha, H., & Shuttleworth, R. (2009). What’s so ‘critical’ about critical disability studies? Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15(1), 47–75.
Molton, I. R., & Yorkston, K. M. (2017). Growing older with a physical disability: A special application of the successful aging paradigm. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 72(2), 290–299.
Naegele, L., De Tavernier, W., & Hess, M. (2018). Work environment and the origin of ageism. In Contemporary perspectives on ageism (pp. 73–90). Springer.
Nario-Redmond, M. R. (2010). Cultural stereotypes of disabled and non-disabled men and women: Consensus for global category representations and diagnostic domains. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 471–488.
Nelson, T. D. (2005). Ageism: Prejudice against our feared future self. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 207–221.
Oliveira, E. (2021). Age-inclusive HR policies and the thriving of older workers: The mediating role of occupational future time perspective. Career Development International, 26(3), 348–362.
Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Overall, C. (2006). Old age and ageism, impairment, and ableism: Exploring the conceptual and material connections. NWSA Journal, 18, 126–137.
Pagán, R. (2009). Part-time work among older workers with disabilities in Europe. Public Health, 123(5), 378–383.
Pagán, R. (2013). Job satisfaction and domains of job satisfaction for older workers with disabilities in Europe. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(3), 861–891.
Park, C. S., Liu, Q., & Kaye, B. K. (2021). Analysis of ageism, sexism, and ableism in user comments on YouTube videos about climate activist Greta Thunberg. Social Media+ Society, 7(3), 20563051211036059.
Paterson, K., & Hughes, B. (1999). Disability studies and phenomenology: The carnal politics of everyday life. Disability & Society, 14(5), 597–610.
Rabheru, K., & Gillis, M. (2021). Navigating the perfect storm of ageism, mentalism, and ableism: A prevention model. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 29(10), 1058–1061.
Retief, M., & Letšosa, R. (2018). Models of disability: A brief overview. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 74(1), a4738.
Reynolds, J. M. (2018). Three things clinicians should know about disability. AMA Journal of Ethics, 20(12), E1182–E1188.
Reynolds, J. M., & Landre, A. (2022). Ableism and ageism: Insights from disability studies for ageing studies. In Critical humanities and ageing: Forging interdisciplinary dialogues.
Rodriguez, R. P., Sánchez, C. R., de Haro, C. O., & Maldonado, J. S. (2014). Older workers with disabilities: Job satisfaction differences in Europe. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9(3), 711–731.
Roehrig, C., Klayman, D., & Robinson, K. (2013). Aging into disability beyond 50: The impact on labor force participation and earnings. In Disability and intersecting statuses (Vol. 7, pp. 189–204). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Rohwerder, B. (2015). Disability inclusion: Topic guide GSDRC. University of Birmingham.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433–440.
Sengupta, M., & Agree, E. M. (2002). Gender and disability among older adults in North and South India: Differences associated with coresidence and marriage. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 17, 313–336.
Shakespeare, T. (2018). Disability: The basics. Routledge.
Sheets, D. (2005). Ageing with disabilities: Ageism and more. Generations, 29(3), 37–41.
Simcock, P., & Castle, R. (2016). Social work and disability. John Wiley & Sons.
Smith, B., & Bundon, A. (2018). Disability models: Explaining and understanding disability sport in different ways. In The Palgrave handbook of Paralympic studies (pp. 15–34). Palgrave Macmillan.
Teo, S. T., Bentley, T. A., Nguyen, D., Blackwood, K., & Catley, B. (2022). Inclusive leadership, matured age HRM policies, and older worker wellbeing. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 60(2), 323–341.
Thomas, C. (1999). Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability. Open University Press.
Thomas, D., & Woods, H. (2003). Working with people with learning disabilities. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Thrasher, G. R., Markel, K. S., & Barclay, L. A. (2021). Older workers with disabilities: A person-centred approach to understanding the effect of comorbidity on work outcomes. Work, Ageing and Retirement, 7(3), 229–239.
Ugargol, A. P., & Nair, V. (2023). Intersectionality and cumulative disadvantage in access to healthcare for older adults in India. In Handbook of aging, health and public policy. Springer.
Ugargol, A. P., Kashyap, G. C., & Shaw, S. (2023). Exploring the influence of work, retirement, and pensions on the self-reported health of older adults in India: Evidence from the LASI and beyond. In Handbook of aging, health and public policy: Perspectives from Asia (pp. 1–28). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
United Nations. (2019). Report of the special rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities. A/74/186, pp. 22–23.
van der Horst, M., & Vickerstaff, S. (2022). Is part of ageism actually ableism? Ageing & Society, 42(9), 1979–1990.
Verbrugge, L. M. (1990). The iceberg of disability. In S. M. Stahl (Ed.), The legacy of longevity: Health and health care in later life (pp. 55–75). Sage Publications.
Verbrugge, L. M., & Yang, L. S. (2002). Aging with disability and disability with aging. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 12(4), 253–267.
Wendell, S. (1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. Routledge.
Woolever, J. (2013). Human resource departments and older adults in the workplace. In Ageism and mistreatment of older workers (pp. 111–134). Springer. (BK – Chapter 7).
World Health Organization. (1980). The international classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps (pp. 27–29).
World Health Organization. (2001). The international classification of functioning, disability, and health (p. 10).
Wu, A. Y., & Schimmel Hyde, J. (2019). The post-retirement well-being of workers with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 30(1), 46–55.
Yoshizaki-Gibbons, H. M. (2018). Engaging with ageing: A call for the greying of critical disability studies. In Manifestos for the future of critical disability studies (pp. 179–188). Routledge.
Yoshizaki-Gibbons, H. M. (2021). Integrating critical disability studies and critical gerontology to explore the complexities of ageing with disabilities. In Handbook on ageing with disability (pp. 32–43). Routledge.
Zwerling, C., Sprince, N. L., Davis, C. S., Whitten, P. S., Wallace, R. R., & Heeringa, S. G. (1998). Occupational injuries among older workers with disabilities: A prospective cohort study of the health and retirement survey, 1992 to 1994. American Journal of Public Health, 88(11), 1691–1695.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ugargol, A.P., Harshith, P.D. (2024). Ageism and Ableism: Entwined, Intertwined, or Disparate—A Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Handbook of Aging, Health and Public Policy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1914-4_233-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1914-4_233-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1914-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1914-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Ageism and Ableism: Entwined, Intertwined, or Disparate—A Critical Discourse Analysis- Published:
- 10 August 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1914-4_233-2
-
Original
Ageism and Ableism: Entwined, Intertwined, or Disparate—A Critical Discourse Analysis- Published:
- 10 June 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1914-4_233-1