Abstract
Mummies’ popularity and attractiveness is a well-established fact for all museums that have placed them on display. Public fascination is rooted in the apparently counter natural avoidance of decay these bodies have achieved in some unfathomable ways. Nevertheless, this morbid attraction has also fueled the creativity of some people in wrong ways, probably from time immemorial. In recent academic memory, though, it is known that purported mermaids and makeshift Egyptian mummies, for instance, toured Europe and North America from the mid-1800s to the early 1900s, as part of circuses’ side and freakshows. Although most of visitors saw them tongue-in-cheek, their continuity was guaranteed by their display being profitable. It was education and respect of fellow humans’ demise, which slowly phased out these once prevalent elements of popular culture.
The academic world has not been spared by the manipulation of human remains, in order to escalate positions in an ill manner, or as an easy way to obtain quick fame, popularity, and even income. Though the Piltdown skull case stands as the foremost from a historical perspective, sadly, it is far from standing alone. Recent on-line and television appearance of purportedly extraterrestrial remains excavated in unknown circumstances in the Southern Peruvian coast has revealed itself as the end product of a long process which joins grave looting, yellow press, and some disoriented professionals. Organizers and attendees to the IX World Congress on Mummy Studies held in Lima, Peru, faced a disinformation campaign by presenting a declaration preventing the public and the media of this hoax. Since then, the producers of this scam program have kept, unfortunately, trying to validate their claims by using fallacious strategies, fueled by the revenue of selling the show.
Forgeries are obscure in their own nature. Scammers purposefully hide the true origin of their products. This has been the case of these false alien mummies supposedly found near Nazca by grave looters. The location remains in secrecy, the discoverer only accessible to the production ring; and any attempt to oppose their plot faces attacks and more deception build up on, namely, conspiracy theories.
In the time of artificial intelligence development to unprecedented levels, and of deep fake creations quickly distributed online, we could only foresee newer attempts to not only fool the media and the public, but also academia. The main aim of this chapter is to prevent this from happening, through exposure and education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhattacharya S, Li J, Sockell A, Kan M, Bava F, Chen SC, Ávila-Arcos M, Ji X, Smith E, Asadi NB, Lachman R, Lam H, Bustamante C, Butte A, Nolan G (2018) Whole-genome sequencing of Atacama skeleton shows novel mutations linked with dysplasia. Genome Res 28:423–431
Brier B (2013) Egyptomania: our three-thousand-year obsession with the land of the pharaohs. St. Martin’s Publishing Group, New York, NY
Dias N (2021) Human remains in the history of archaelogy. In: Oxford handbook of the history of archaeology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Everts S (2013) Crystal Skulls Deemed Fake. Chem Eng News 91(9):48–49
Hayden E (2018) Tiny Mummy’s ‘alien’ appearance finally explained. National Geographic, March 22
Heaney C (2017) The racism behind alien mummy hoaxes: pre-Columbian bodies are once again being used as evidence for extraterrestrial life. The Atlantic, August 1st
Martinez–Conde S (2016) Has contemporary academia outgrown the Carl Sagan effect? J Neurosci 36(7):2077–2082
Nolan G, Butte A (2018) The Atacama skeleton. Genome Res 28:607–608
Polidoro M (2002) Ica stones: Yabba-Dabba-Do! Skeptical Enquirer 26(5):24–25
Riggs C (2016) Beautiful burials, beautiful skulls: the aesthetics of the Egyptian mummy. Br J Aesthet 56(3):247–263
Romey KM, Rose M (2001) Special report: Saga of the Persian princess. Archaeology 54(1):24–25
Ross I, Ross CU (1979) Body snatching in nineteenth century Britain: from exhumation to murder. Br J Law Soc 6(1):108–118
Salas–Gismondi R (2017) Momia de Nasca, parte 2: Análisis de las manos y pies. http://www.cientificos.pe/index.php/2017/06/28/momia-de-nasca-parte-2-analisis-manos-y-pies/
Sotiriou KO (2018) The F words: frauds, forgeries, and fakes in antiquities smuggling and the role of organized crime. Int J Cult Prop 25(2):223–236
Von Schade M, Wolf K, Schäfer C, Winterstein T (2013) Die Kinder-Mumie vom Dachboden. Erich von Däniken sicher: “Es ist ein Mischwesen”. Bild. 5 August
Wallace P (2019) Phony facts and eco-media: fake nature and the call for widespread media literacy. J Environ Commun 13(6):790–803
West M (2020) Explained: new navy UFO videos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7jcBGLIpus&feature=youtu.be
Williams J (2017) A new American freak show. In: Media, performative identity, and the new American freak show. Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK
Yuhas A (2020) The Pentagon released U.F.O. videos. Don’t hold your breath for a breakthrough. New York Times, April 28. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/28/us/pentagon-ufo-videos.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lombardi, G., Rodríguez Martín, C. (2021). Fake and Alien Mummies. In: Shin, D.H., Bianucci, R. (eds) The Handbook of Mummy Studies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3354-9_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3354-9_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3353-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3354-9
eBook Packages: HistoryReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities