Skip to main content

Ecological Systems Theory in Clinical Learning

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Clinical Education for the Health Professions

Abstract

Ecological Systems Theory (EST) seeks to understand human development through examining the interactions between an individual’s innate nature and the multiple influences from the environment. Its emphasis on understanding developmental issues from a nonlinear, multifactorial perspective suits the study of clinical education in an age where healthcare is a social system involving multiple factors that are inter-related in complex ways. In this chapter, we describe the potential uses of EST in understanding and exploring how contextual influences impact clinical learning, transitions and change, and helping trainees with difficulties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al Kai HM, Al-Moamary MS, Elzubair M, Magzoub ME, AlMutairi A, Roberts C, et al. Exploring factors affecting undergraduate medical students’ study strategies in the clinical years: a qualitative study. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2011;16(5):553–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artemeva N, Rachul C, O’Brien B, Varpio L. Situated learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2016;92(1):134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A, Ross D, Ross SA. Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1961;63(3):575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind D. Prototypical descriptions of 3 parenting styles. Psychology. 1966;37:1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluteau P, Clouder L, Cureton D. Developing interprofessional education online: an ecological systems theory analysis. J Interprof Care. 2017;31(4):420–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts M. Self-regulated learning: a new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learn Instr. 1997;7(2):161–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boon HJ, Cottrell A, King D, Stevenson RB, Millar J. Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory for modelling community resilience to natural disasters. Nat Hazards. 2012;60(2):381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite J, Churruca K, Long JC, Ellis LA, Herkes J. When complexity science meets implementation science: a theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):63–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U. Two worlds of childhood: US and USSR. New York: Basic Books; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U. Ecology of the family as a context for human development: research perspectives. Dev Psychol. 1986;22(6):723–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U. Interacting systems in human development. Research paradigms: present and future. In: Bolger N, Caspi A, Downey G, Moorehouse M, editors. Persons in contexts: developmental processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1988. p. 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological systems theory. In: Vasta R, editor. Annals of child development. Greench: JAI Press; 1989. p. 187–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U. Environments in developmental perspective: theoretical and operational models. In: Friedman SL, Wachs TD, editors. Measuring environment across the life span: emerging methods and concepts. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999. p. 3–28.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U. Human development: bioecological theory of. In: Smelser N, Baltes P, editors. International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. New York: Elsevier; 2001. p. 6963–70.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U. Making human beings human: bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U, Ceci SJ. Heredity, environment, and the question “how?”: a first approximation. In: Plomin R, McClern GG, editors. Nature, nurture, and psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1993. p. 313–23.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U, Ceci SJ. Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: a bioecological model. Psychol Rev. 1994;101(4):568–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U, Crouter AC. Evolution of environmental models in developmental research. In: Mussen PH, editor. Handbook of child psychology: formerly Carmichael’s Manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U, Evans GW. Developmental science in the 21st century: emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Soc Dev. 2000;9(1):115–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U, Morris PA. The ecology of developmental processes. In: Damon W, Lerner R, editors. Handbook of child psychology, Theoretical models of human development, vol. 1. New York: Wiley; 1998. p. 993–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner U, Morris PA. The bioecological model of human development. In: Damon W, Lerner R, editors. Handbook of child psychology: theoretical models of human development. New York: Wiley; 2006. p. 793–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res. 1989;18(1):32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristancho S, Field E, Lingard L. What is the state of complexity science in medical education research? Med Educ. 2019;53(1):95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amour D, Oandasan I. Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: an emerging concept. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(S1):8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennick R. Constructivism: reflections on twenty five years teaching the constructivist approach in medical education. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:200–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewhurst G. Time for change: teaching and learning on busy post-take ward rounds. Clin Med J R Coll Phys. 2010;10(3):231–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornan T, Boshuizen H, King N, Scherpbier A. Experience-based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students’ workplace learning. Med Educ. 2007;41(1):84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellaway RH, Bates J, Teunissen PW. Ecological theories of systems and contextual change in medical education. Med Educ. 2017;51(12):1250–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson M, Ghazinour M, Hammarström A. Different uses of bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory in public mental health research: what is their value for guiding public mental health policy and practice? Soc Theory Health. 2018;16(4):414–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foo YY. Parents’ stories to live by in a competitive educational landscape. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruppen L, Irby DM, Durning SJ, Maggio LA. Interventions designed to improve the learning environment in the health professions: a scoping review. MedEdPublish. 2018;7

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton SF, Luster T. Bronfenbrenner, Urie. In: Fisher CB, Lerner RM, editors. Encyclopedia of applied developmental science. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005. p. 184–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamwey M, Allen L, Hay M, Varpio L. Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological model of human development: applications for health professions education. Acad Med. 2019;94(10):1621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashim A. Educational challenges faced by international medical graduates in the UK. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:441–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes N, O’Toole L, Halpenny AM. Introducing Bronfenbrenner: a guide for practitioners and students in early years education. London/New York: Routledge; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houpy JC, Lee WW, Woodruff JN, Pincavage AT. Medical student resilience and stressful clinical events during clinical training. Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1320187–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen PD, McGill JS, Palmer SJ. Factors influencing career decisions: perspectives of nursing students in three types of programs. J Nurs Educ. 2003;42(4):168–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitz LA. Understanding health care as a complex system. JAMA. 2012;308(3):243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):351–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennin S. Complexity and health professions education. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(4):835–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordquist J, Hall J, Caverzagie K, Snell L, Chan M-K, Thoma B, et al. The clinical learning environment. Med Teach. 2019;41(4):366–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien BC, Poncelet AN. Transition to clerkship courses: preparing students to enter the workplace. Acad Med. 2010;85(12):1862–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi M, Haghani F. Reflection in medical education: a review of concepts, models, principles and methods of teaching reflection in medical education. Res Med Educ. 2017;9(2):24–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggins-Caspers KM, Cadoret RJ, Knutson JF, Langbehn D. Biology-environment interaction and evocative biology-environment correlation: contributions of harsh discipline and parental psychopathology to problem adolescent behaviors. Behav Genet. 2003;33(3):205–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saigal P, Takemura Y, Nishiue T, Fetters MD. Factors considered by medical students when formulating their specialty preferences in Japan: findings from a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7(1):31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher E. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanfey HA, Saalwachter-Schulman AR, Nyhof-Young JM, Eidelson B, Mann BD. Influences on medical student career choice: gender or generation? Arch Surg. 2006;141(11):1086–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small SA, Luster T. Adolescent sexual activity: an ecological, risk-factor approach. J Marriage Fam. 1994;56(1):181–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturman N, Tan Z, Turner J. “A steep learning curve”: junior doctor perspectives on the transition from medical student to the health-care workplace. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):92–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PW. Experience, trajectories, and reifications: an emerging framework of practice-based learning in healthcare workplaces. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2015;20(4):843–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PW, Westerman M. Opportunity or threat: the ambiguity of the consequences of transitions in medical education. Med Educ. 2011;45(1):51–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tudge JRH, Mokrova I, Hatfield BE, Karnik RB. Uses and misuses of bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development. J Fam Theory Rev. 2009;1(4):198–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E, McDermott RA, Snyder W. Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams KN, Ramani S, Fraser B, Orlander JD. Improving bedside teaching: findings from a focus group study of learners. Acad Med. 2008;83(3):257–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YL. Using Bronfenbrenner’s ecological approach to understand academic advising with international community college students. J Int Stud. 2018;8(4):1764–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Yann Foo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Foo, Y.Y., Goy, R. (2021). Ecological Systems Theory in Clinical Learning. In: Nestel, D., Reedy, G., McKenna, L., Gough, S. (eds) Clinical Education for the Health Professions. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6106-7_37-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6106-7_37-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6106-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6106-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics