Abstract
Ecological Systems Theory (EST) seeks to understand human development through examining the interactions between an individual’s innate nature and the multiple influences from the environment. Its emphasis on understanding developmental issues from a nonlinear, multifactorial perspective suits the study of clinical education in an age where healthcare is a social system involving multiple factors that are inter-related in complex ways. In this chapter, we describe the potential uses of EST in understanding and exploring how contextual influences impact clinical learning, transitions and change, and helping trainees with difficulties.
References
Al Kai HM, Al-Moamary MS, Elzubair M, Magzoub ME, AlMutairi A, Roberts C, et al. Exploring factors affecting undergraduate medical students’ study strategies in the clinical years: a qualitative study. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2011;16(5):553–67.
Artemeva N, Rachul C, O’Brien B, Varpio L. Situated learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2016;92(1):134.
Bandura A, Ross D, Ross SA. Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1961;63(3):575.
Baumrind D. Prototypical descriptions of 3 parenting styles. Psychology. 1966;37:1966.
Bluteau P, Clouder L, Cureton D. Developing interprofessional education online: an ecological systems theory analysis. J Interprof Care. 2017;31(4):420–8.
Boekaerts M. Self-regulated learning: a new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learn Instr. 1997;7(2):161–86.
Boon HJ, Cottrell A, King D, Stevenson RB, Millar J. Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory for modelling community resilience to natural disasters. Nat Hazards. 2012;60(2):381.
Braithwaite J, Churruca K, Long JC, Ellis LA, Herkes J. When complexity science meets implementation science: a theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):63–14.
Bronfenbrenner U. Two worlds of childhood: US and USSR. New York: Basic Books; 1970.
Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979.
Bronfenbrenner U. Ecology of the family as a context for human development: research perspectives. Dev Psychol. 1986;22(6):723–42.
Bronfenbrenner U. Interacting systems in human development. Research paradigms: present and future. In: Bolger N, Caspi A, Downey G, Moorehouse M, editors. Persons in contexts: developmental processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1988. p. 25–49.
Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological systems theory. In: Vasta R, editor. Annals of child development. Greench: JAI Press; 1989. p. 187–249.
Bronfenbrenner U. Environments in developmental perspective: theoretical and operational models. In: Friedman SL, Wachs TD, editors. Measuring environment across the life span: emerging methods and concepts. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999. p. 3–28.
Bronfenbrenner U. Human development: bioecological theory of. In: Smelser N, Baltes P, editors. International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. New York: Elsevier; 2001. p. 6963–70.
Bronfenbrenner U. Making human beings human: bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005.
Bronfenbrenner U, Ceci SJ. Heredity, environment, and the question “how?”: a first approximation. In: Plomin R, McClern GG, editors. Nature, nurture, and psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1993. p. 313–23.
Bronfenbrenner U, Ceci SJ. Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: a bioecological model. Psychol Rev. 1994;101(4):568–86.
Bronfenbrenner U, Crouter AC. Evolution of environmental models in developmental research. In: Mussen PH, editor. Handbook of child psychology: formerly Carmichael’s Manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley; 1983.
Bronfenbrenner U, Evans GW. Developmental science in the 21st century: emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Soc Dev. 2000;9(1):115–25.
Bronfenbrenner U, Morris PA. The ecology of developmental processes. In: Damon W, Lerner R, editors. Handbook of child psychology, Theoretical models of human development, vol. 1. New York: Wiley; 1998. p. 993–1023.
Bronfenbrenner U, Morris PA. The bioecological model of human development. In: Damon W, Lerner R, editors. Handbook of child psychology: theoretical models of human development. New York: Wiley; 2006. p. 793–828.
Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res. 1989;18(1):32–42.
Cristancho S, Field E, Lingard L. What is the state of complexity science in medical education research? Med Educ. 2019;53(1):95–104.
D’Amour D, Oandasan I. Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: an emerging concept. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(S1):8–20.
Dennick R. Constructivism: reflections on twenty five years teaching the constructivist approach in medical education. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:200–5.
Dewhurst G. Time for change: teaching and learning on busy post-take ward rounds. Clin Med J R Coll Phys. 2010;10(3):231–4.
Dornan T, Boshuizen H, King N, Scherpbier A. Experience-based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students’ workplace learning. Med Educ. 2007;41(1):84–91.
Ellaway RH, Bates J, Teunissen PW. Ecological theories of systems and contextual change in medical education. Med Educ. 2017;51(12):1250–9.
Eriksson M, Ghazinour M, Hammarström A. Different uses of bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory in public mental health research: what is their value for guiding public mental health policy and practice? Soc Theory Health. 2018;16(4):414–33.
Foo YY. Parents’ stories to live by in a competitive educational landscape. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University; 2018.
Gruppen L, Irby DM, Durning SJ, Maggio LA. Interventions designed to improve the learning environment in the health professions: a scoping review. MedEdPublish. 2018;7
Hamilton SF, Luster T. Bronfenbrenner, Urie. In: Fisher CB, Lerner RM, editors. Encyclopedia of applied developmental science. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005. p. 184–8.
Hamwey M, Allen L, Hay M, Varpio L. Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological model of human development: applications for health professions education. Acad Med. 2019;94(10):1621.
Hashim A. Educational challenges faced by international medical graduates in the UK. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:441–5.
Hayes N, O’Toole L, Halpenny AM. Introducing Bronfenbrenner: a guide for practitioners and students in early years education. London/New York: Routledge; 2017.
Houpy JC, Lee WW, Woodruff JN, Pincavage AT. Medical student resilience and stressful clinical events during clinical training. Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1320187–8.
Larsen PD, McGill JS, Palmer SJ. Factors influencing career decisions: perspectives of nursing students in three types of programs. J Nurs Educ. 2003;42(4):168–73.
Lipsitz LA. Understanding health care as a complex system. JAMA. 2012;308(3):243.
McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):351–77.
Mennin S. Complexity and health professions education. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(4):835–7.
Nordquist J, Hall J, Caverzagie K, Snell L, Chan M-K, Thoma B, et al. The clinical learning environment. Med Teach. 2019;41(4):366–72.
O’Brien BC, Poncelet AN. Transition to clerkship courses: preparing students to enter the workplace. Acad Med. 2010;85(12):1862–9.
Rahimi M, Haghani F. Reflection in medical education: a review of concepts, models, principles and methods of teaching reflection in medical education. Res Med Educ. 2017;9(2):24–13.
Riggins-Caspers KM, Cadoret RJ, Knutson JF, Langbehn D. Biology-environment interaction and evocative biology-environment correlation: contributions of harsh discipline and parental psychopathology to problem adolescent behaviors. Behav Genet. 2003;33(3):205–20.
Saigal P, Takemura Y, Nishiue T, Fetters MD. Factors considered by medical students when formulating their specialty preferences in Japan: findings from a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7(1):31.
Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher E. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 43–64.
Sanfey HA, Saalwachter-Schulman AR, Nyhof-Young JM, Eidelson B, Mann BD. Influences on medical student career choice: gender or generation? Arch Surg. 2006;141(11):1086–94.
Small SA, Luster T. Adolescent sexual activity: an ecological, risk-factor approach. J Marriage Fam. 1994;56(1):181–92.
Sturman N, Tan Z, Turner J. “A steep learning curve”: junior doctor perspectives on the transition from medical student to the health-care workplace. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):92–7.
Teunissen PW. Experience, trajectories, and reifications: an emerging framework of practice-based learning in healthcare workplaces. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2015;20(4):843–56.
Teunissen PW, Westerman M. Opportunity or threat: the ambiguity of the consequences of transitions in medical education. Med Educ. 2011;45(1):51–9.
Tudge JRH, Mokrova I, Hatfield BE, Karnik RB. Uses and misuses of bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development. J Fam Theory Rev. 2009;1(4):198–210.
Wenger E, McDermott RA, Snyder W. Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2002.
Williams KN, Ramani S, Fraser B, Orlander JD. Improving bedside teaching: findings from a focus group study of learners. Acad Med. 2008;83(3):257–64.
Zhang YL. Using Bronfenbrenner’s ecological approach to understand academic advising with international community college students. J Int Stud. 2018;8(4):1764–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Foo, Y.Y., Goy, R. (2021). Ecological Systems Theory in Clinical Learning. In: Nestel, D., Reedy, G., McKenna, L., Gough, S. (eds) Clinical Education for the Health Professions. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6106-7_37-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6106-7_37-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6106-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6106-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education