Abrahams, I. (2009). Does practical work really motivate? A study of the affective value of practical work in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2335–2353. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802342836
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
Adams, C. M., & Pierce, R. L. (2008). Science, elementary. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 563–578). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Anderson, D. (2013). Leading change in primary science: Experiences of primary science teacher fellows who have raised the profile of science in their schools. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 28(2), 15–27.
Anderson, D., & Moeed, A. (2017). Working alongside scientists. Science & Education, 1 1–28.
Assouline, S. G., Ihrig, L. M., & Mahatmya, D. (2017). Closing the excellence gap: Investigation of an expanded talent search model for student selection into an extracurricular STEM program in rural middle schools. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701833
Borland, J. H. (2008). Identification. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 261–301). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Bull, A. (2015). Capabilities for living and lifelong learning: What’s science got to do with it? Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Chan, W. (2018). Gifted education in Asia. In S. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 71–84). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-005
Cho, S. (2004). Gifted and talented education in Korea: Its problems and visions. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 1(1), 119–127.
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., Marron, M. A., Castellano, J. A., Clinkenbeard, P. R., Rogers, K., … Smith, D. (2010). Guidelines for developing an academic acceleration policy: National work group on acceleration. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(2), 180–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1002100202
Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2002). Summing up the education of mathematically gifted students. In Proceedings 25th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pages 219–226, Auckland. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d7f9/f247713fd073e2b8c5555cf58c2b370fa7e9.pdf
Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science. Science & Education, 22(9), 2109–2139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9539-4
Education Counts. (2015). PISA 2015: The science context for PISA. Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/2543/pisa-2015/pisa-scientific-literacy-report
Education Review Office. (2008). Schools’ provision for gifted and talented students. Wellington, New Zealand: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ero.govt.nz/National-Reports/Schools-Provision-for-Gifted-and-Talented-Students-Good-Practice-June-2008
Education Review Office. (2012). Science in the New Zealand curriculum: Years 5 to 8. Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.ero.govt.nz/publications/science-in-the-new-zealand-curriculum-years-5-to-8/
Education Review Office. (2016). Education diversity in New Zealand state schools. Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.ero.govt.nz/footer-upper/news/ero-insights-term-1/ethnic-diversity-in-new-zealand-state-schools/
Gilbert, J. K., & Newberry, M. (2007). The characteristics of the gifted and exceptionally able in science. In K. Taber (Ed.), Science education for gifted learners (pp. 15–31). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Goodrum, D., Druhan, A., & Abbs, J. (2011). The status and quality of year 11 and 12 science in Australian schools. Report prepared for the Office of the Chief Scientist. http://www.science.org.au/reports/documents/Year-1112-Report-Final.pdf.
Hampden-Thompson, G., & Bennett, J. (2013). Science teaching and learning activities and students’ engagement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1325–1343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.608093
Hattie, J. (2011). Q & A. Tall Poppies, March.
Hipkins, R., & Bull, A. (2015). Science capabilities for a functional understanding of the nature of science. Curriculum Matters, 11, 117–133. https://doi.org/10.18296/cm.0007
Horsley, J. (2012). Teacher catalysts: Characteristics of teachers who facilitate high academic success. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 21(1), 23–31.
Horsley, J., & Moeed, A. (2017). If only I had time. New Zealand Science Review, 74(2), 36–44.
Hui, N. N. A., He Wu, J. M., Kuo, C. C., Tan, A. G., Lyu, L., & Chan, L. K. (2018). Gaps and goes in policy, practice, and research of gifted education in China, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan. In J. K. Kennedy & J. C.-K. Lee (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of schools and schooling in Asia (pp. 555–569). London, England: Routledge.
Ibata-Arens, K. C. (2012). Race to the future: Innovations in gifted and enrichment education in Asia, and implications for the United States. Administrative Sciences, 2(1), 1–25.
Kaplan, S. N., McComas, W. F., & Manzone, J. A. (2016). Teaching science and gifted students. International Perspectives on Science Education for the Gifted: Key Issues and Challenges, 27, 27–42.
Kennedy, D. (2014). The role of investigations in promoting inquiry-based science education in Ireland. Science Education International, 24(3), 282–305. Retrieved from http://www.icaseonline.net/sei/september2013/P3.pdf
Kennedy, J. P., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teaching Science, 60(2), 34–46. Retrieved from http://www.growingtallpoppies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Continuing-Decline-of-Science-by-Kennedy-Lyons-Quinn.pdf
Kennedy, M. J., Wagner, D., Stegall, J., Lembke, E., Miciak, J., Alves, K. D., … Hirsch, S. E. (2016). Using content acquisition podcasts to improve teacher candidate knowledge of curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 82(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915615885
Kind, P., & Osborne, J. (2017). Styles of scientific reasoning: A cultural rationale for science education? Science Education, 101(1), 8–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21251
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2004). Revising instruction to teach nature of science. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 36–39.
Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., & Swiatek, M. A. (1999). Elementary student talent searches: Establishing appropriate guidelines for qualifying test scores. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629904300405
MacDonald, N. (2012). Sir Paul Callaghan: Kiwi visionary looks back on life. The dominion post. Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/6636553/Sir-Paul-Callaghan-Kiwi-visionary-looks-back-on-life
Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718344
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000. Science education for the future. London, England: Nuffield Foundation.
Mills, C. J. (2003). Characteristics of effective teachers of gifted students: Teacher background and personality styles of students. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(4), 272–281.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (2017a). The National Administration Guidelines (NAGs). Retrieved from https://education.govt.nz/ministry-of-education/legislation/nags/
Ministry of Education. (2017b). Legislation. Retrieved from https://education.govt.nz/ministry-of-education/legislation
Ministry of Education (2019). About us: Tā mātou kaupapa – Our purpose. Retrieved from https://education.govt.nz/our-work/our-role-and-our-people/.
Ministry of Education. (n.d.). Science online: Science capabilities for citizenship. Retrieved from http://scienceonline.tki.org.nz/Science-capabilities-for-citizenship
Ministry of Education (MoE). (1993). Science in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
Moeed, A. (2015). Investigating science investigation: A robust case study design. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 6(4), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTCS.2015.074599
Moeed, A. (2016). Novelty, variety, relevance, challenge and assessment: How science investigations influence the motivation of year 11 students in New Zealand. School Science Review, 97(361), 75–81.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K–12 Science Education Standards, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.
New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA). (2017). Qualify for the future world. Retrieved from https://www.nzqa.govt.nz/qualifications-standards/qualifications/ncea/understanding-ncea/how-ncea-works/standards/
Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
Osborne, J. (2015). Practical work in science: Misunderstood and badly used? School Science Review, 96(357), 16–24. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ba9c/4c63d00002d887e7abdaf9fa12ab81b529a7.pdf
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections (Vol. 13). London, England: The Nuffield Foundation.
Palmer, D. (2004). Situational interest and the attitudes towards science of primary teacher education students. International Journal of Science Education, 26(7), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000177262
Palmer, D. H. (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20263
Preckel, F., Götz, T., & Frenzel, A. (2010). Ability grouping of gifted students: Effects on academic self-concept and boredom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X480716
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1982). A case for a broadened conception of giftedness. Phi Delta Kappan, 63(4), 619–620. Retrieved from https://gifted.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/961/2015/02/Broadened_Conception_Giftedness.pdf
Renzulli, J. S., Siegle, D., Reis, S. M., Gavin, M. K., & Reed, R. E. S. (2009). An investigation of the reliability and factor structure of four new scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(1), 84–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X0902100105
Rubenstein, L. D., Siegle, D., Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., & Burton, M. G. (2012). A complex quest: The development and research of underachievement interventions for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 678–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21620
Shin, J. E. L., Levy, S. R., & London, B. (2016). Effects of role model exposure on STEM and non-STEM student engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(7), 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12371
Sternberg, R. J. (2010). Assessment of gifted students for identification purposes: New techniques for a new millennium. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.08.003
Stumpf, H., Mills, C. J., Brody, L. E., & Baxley, P. G. (2013). Expanding talent search procedures by including measures of spatial ability: CTY’s spatial test battery. Roeper Review, 35(4), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2013.829548
Sumida, M. (2013). Emerging trends in Japan in education of the gifted: A focus on science education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353213493534
Swiatek, M. A. (2007). The talent search model: Past, present, and future. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207306318
Taber, K. S. (2007). Science education for gifted learners. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Taber, K. S. (2016). The nature of science and the teaching of gifted learners. In K. Taber & M. Sumida (Eds.), International perspectives on science education for the gifted (pp. 2–11). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Taber, K. S., & Cole, J. (2010). The CREST awards scheme: Challenging gifted and talented students through creative STEM project work. School Science Review, 92(339), 117–126.
Taber, K. S., & Riga, F. (2007). In K. Taber. (Ed.), Science education for gifted learners (pp. 15–31). Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Taber, K. S., Sumida, M., & McClure, L. (Eds.). (2017). Teaching gifted learners in STEM subjects: Developing talent in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Tyler-Wood, T. L., Mortenson, M., Putney, D., & Cass, M. A. (2000). An effective mathematics and science curriculum option for secondary gifted education. Roeper Review, 22(4), 266–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554050
University of Canterbury. (n.d.). Chemistry Olympiad. Retrieved from https://www.canterbury.ac.nz/science/schools-and-departments/phys-chem/chemistry/chemistry-olympiad/
University of Otago. (n.d.). New Zealand marine studies centre: Science extension and enrichment. Retrieved from https://www.otago.ac.nz/marine-studies/learning/science-extension/otago062394.pdf
VanTassel-Baska, J., & MacFarlane, B. (2008). Secondary science. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 579–593). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
VanTassel-Baska, J., MacFarlane, B., & Feng, A. (2008). A cross-cultural study of exemplary teaching: What do Singapore and the United States secondary gifted class teachers say? Gifted and Talented International, 21, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2006.11673474
Wardman, J., & Hattie, J. (2012). Administrators’ perceptions of full-year acceleration at high school. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 21(1), 32–41.
Warne, R. T. (2012). History and development of above-level testing of the gifted. Roeper Review, 34(3), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.686425