Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation

Living Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters, Richard Heraud

Approaches to Scaling Innovations Across Schools, an Analysis of Key Theories and Models

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2262-4_68-1


The question of how to scale up and sustain successful innovations remains a key challenge for policy and practice in education. For example, Gene Hall (2013: 265) explains, somewhat wearily, that:

Over the last several decades the change ritual has become almost predictable. The process begins with identifying a particular problem or symptom that must be addressed… Next, a specific program, process or product… is selected. Then teachers, schools and districts go through the ceremony of launching the “new way.” Materials are delivered to schools and teachers attend introductory sessions before the new school year begins. The implicit assumption of policymakers and system leaders… is that the “new way” is now in place. Within one to three years there may be an evaluation to see if test scores have indeed increased. All too often, the finding is one of “no significant difference” between the new way and the old way.

This picture of failed reforms remains dispiritingly...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Bryk, A. (2015). Accelerating how we learn to improve. Educational Researcher, 44(9), 467–477.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15621543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Glennan, T. K., Jr., Bodilly, S. J., Galegher, J. R., & Kerr, K. A. (2004). Expanding the reach of education reforms: Perspectives from leaders in the scale-up of educational interventions. Santa Monika: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  3. Hall, G. E. (2013). Evaluating change processes: Assessing extent of implementation (constructs, methods and implications). Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), 264–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. OECD. (2015). Schooling redesigned: Towards innovative learning systems (Educational research and innovation). Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264245914-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Resnick, L. B. (2010). Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39(3), 183–197.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10364671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Liang See Tan
    • 1
  • Keith Tan
    • 2
  • Monica Ong
  1. 1.National Institute of EducationSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Office of Education ResearchNational Institute of EducationSingaporeSingapore