Skip to main content

Building Preservice Teachers’ Confidence for Teaching and Learning STEM, Incorporating Innovative, Interdisciplinary, and Integrated (3I) Initiatives

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Teacher Education
  • 57 Accesses

Abstract

Twenty-first-century education needs to respond to the events and trends that young people will meet in their adult lives. While extensive technological, scientific, and medical research has changed the world in the last decade, there are also a number of difficulties that need to be faced, understood, and responded to, such as climate change and pandemics. Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education has a role to play in producing a future generation capable of making changes in existing lifestyles and practices to deal with challenging and complex situations. To achieve this, it is vital that teachers have the confidence, capacity, and skills they need to develop innovative, interdisciplinary, and integrated (3I) STEM teaching and learning practices. Teachers need to build opportunities into learning scenarios so that children experience and engage with the practice of constructing, testing, refining, and justifying evidence-based explanations in authentic situations. This chapter focuses on the programs of preservice preparation for STEM teachers, highlighting the need to blend interdisciplinary conceptual content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge to support the development of relevant STEM classroom experiences. This emphasis at preservice level requires considerable change in approach in terms of the disciplinary/interdisciplinary curriculum, professional experience, and effective mentoring for preservice teachers within the existing practice of STEM teaching and learning in preservice programs and schools. By focusing on innovative, interdisciplinary, and integrated initiatives, preservice teachers could develop STEM pedagogy that helps young people build the skills and knowledge base to meet the challenges that they will need to deal with in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Reference

  • Alderson, P. (2019). Powerful knowledge and the curriculum: Contradictions and dichotomies. British Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z. (2020). Knowledge, content, curriculum and didaktik: Beyond social realism. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., Perkins, K., Pearce, J., & Hong, J. (2015). Work-integrated learning in STEM in Australian universities (Final Report). ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurup, P. M., Li, X., Powell, G., & Brown, M. (2019). Building capacity of future primary teachers’ in STEM: Based on a platform of beliefs, understandings and intentions. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0164-5

  • Kurup, P. M., Levinson, R., & Li, X. (2021). Informed-decision regarding global warming and climate change among high school students in the United Kingdom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00123-5

  • Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2017). Epistemic fluency and professional education: Innovation, knowledgeable action and actionable knowledge. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, K., & Reeve, E. (2014). Identifying perceptions that contribute to the development of successful project lead the way pre-engineering programs in Utah. Journal of Technology Education, 26(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v26i1.a.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J., & Young, M. (2019). Knowledge, power and powerful knowledge re-visited. Curriculum Journal, 30(2), 196–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1570292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2015). Identifying and supporting productive STEM programs in out-of-school settings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä, M. (2021). Crossing curricular boundaries for powerful knowledge. The Curriculum Journal, 32(2), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.77

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Premnadh M. Kurup .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kurup, P.M., Li, X. (2022). Building Preservice Teachers’ Confidence for Teaching and Learning STEM, Incorporating Innovative, Interdisciplinary, and Integrated (3I) Initiatives. In: Peters, M.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Teacher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6_440-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6_440-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1179-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1179-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics