Skip to main content

A “Cap and Invest” Strategy for Managing the Intergenerational Burdens of Financing Energy Transitions

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Green Finance

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development ((SD))

Abstract

The investment required to meet the climate change commitments of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’s 2015 Paris Accord is on the order of $100 trillion over the next two decades. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions requires a strategy for managing risk that constitutes an intergenerational burden. This chapter proposes a “cap- and-invest” strategy for the build-up of necessary infrastructure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions consistent with national commitments. Cap-and-invest is in sharp contrast with cap-and-trade. An economy-wide general environmental tax on consumption creates a large pool of capital to de-risk investment in emerging low-carbon solutions to the threat of climate change. Innovation in governance is an integral part of the policy to leverage the capital markets through public-private partnerships in green financing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrew J, Kaidonis M, Andrew B (2010) Carbon tax: challenging neoliberal solutions to climate change. Crit Perspect Account 21:611–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avi-Yonah RS, Uhlmann DM (2009) Combating global climate change: why a carbon tax is better response to global warming than cap and trade. Stanford Environ Law J 28(3):3–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball J (2018) Why carbon pricing isn’t working- good idea in theory, failing in practice. Foreign Aff 97(4):134–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Battle K, Tamagno E (2007) Public pension in a development context: the case of Canada. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. Social Policy and Development Programme Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Beland D, Lecours A (2012) Equalization at arm’s length. MOWAT Center. Fiscal Transfers Series, Toronto, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg (2013) Australian factories meet carbon deadline ahead of cap-and-trade, 24 June. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-06-24/australian-factories-meet-carbon-deadline-ahead-of-cap-and-trade

  • British Petroleum (2017) BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2017. http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview. Accessed 7 Mar 2018

  • California Environmental Protection Agency (2013). http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/capandtrade.htm. Accessed 7 Mar 2018

  • Canadian Public Pension Investment Board (CPPIB) (2017) CPPIB annual report 2017, and ‘Policy on Responsible Investing’, CPPIB (2010), Toronto, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark GL, Monk AHB (2009) The legitimacy and governance of Norway’s sovereign wealth fund: the ethics of global investment. Environ Plan A42(7):1723–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Climate Bonds Initiative (2017) Bonds and climate change 2017: Canada report. https://www.climatebonds.net/

  • Daskalakis G (2013) On the efficiency of the European carbon market: new evidence from Phase II. Energy Policy 54:369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Elzen M, Höhne N (2008) Reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in Annex I and non- Annex I countries for meeting concentration stabilisation targets. Climate Change 91(3–4):249–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist (2013a) Carbon trading. ETS RIP? The failure to reform Europe’s carbon market will reverberate round the world, 20 April. http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21576388-failure-reform-europes-carbon-market-will-reverberate-round-world-ets; http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/jun/25/eu-emissions-trading-scheme-energy

  • Economist (2013b) Carbon emissions: the cap doesn’t fit, 19 June. https://www.economist.com/analects/2013/06/19/the-cap-doesnt-fit

  • GEA or Global Energy Assessment (2012) Global energy assessment – toward a sustainable future. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis/Cambridge University Press, Vienna/Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Canada (2007) Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Act. http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-8.3/ Accessed 1 June 2017

  • Harrison K (2010) The comparative politics of carbon taxation. Ann Rev Law Soc Sci 6:507–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison K (2012) A tale of two taxes: the fate of environmental tax reform in Canada. Rev Pol Res 29:383–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2017) World Energy Outlook 2017. OECD/International Energy Agency. http://www.iea.org/weo2017/

  • International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2018) Global Warming of 1.5 degrees C, Summary for Policy Makers, October 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Peterson S, Stavins R (1995) Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us? J Econ Lit 33:132–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossoy A, Ambrosi P (2010) State and trends of the carbon market 2010. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecocq F, Ambrosi P (2007) The clean development mechanism: history, status, and prospects. Policy Monitor 1:134–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecocq F, Capoor K (2005) State and trends of the carbon market 2005. The World Bank and International Emissions Trading Association, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levi MA (2009) Copenhagen’s inconvenient truth: how to salvage the climate conference. Foreign Aff 88(5):92–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippke B, Perez-Garcia J (2008) Will either cap and trade or a carbon emissions tax be effective in monetizing carbon as an ecosystem service? Forest Ecol Manage 256:2160–2165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little B (2009) Fixing the future: how Canada’s usually fractious government worked together to rescue the Canadian pension plan. University of Toronto, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Matisoff DC (2010) Making cap-and-trade work: lessons from the European Union experience. Environment 52(1):10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness M, Ellerman AD (2008) The effects of interactions between federal and state climate policies. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson M (2005) Financing the Canada and Quebec pension plans. Caledon Institute of Social Policy, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa A, Purohit P (2007) Additionality determination of Indian CDM projects – Can Indian CDM project developers outwit the CDM Executive Board? University of Zurich. Climate strategies working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng A (2018) From sustainability accounting to a green financing system: Institutional legitimacy and market heterogeneity in a global financial centre. J Clean Prod 195:585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng A, Nathwani J (2018) Sustainable energy infrastructure for Asia: policy framework for responsible financing and investment. In: Bhattacharyya SC (ed) Routledge handbook of energy in Asia. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 284–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins G, Galiana I, Green C, Grundmann R, Korhola A, Laird F, Nordhaus T, Pielke R, Rayner S, Sarewitz D, Shellenberger M, Stehr N, Tezuko H (2010) The Hartwell paper. Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe B, Borick C (2012) Carbon taxation and policy labeling: experience from American states and Canadian provinces. Rev Policy Res 29:358–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren C, Lo AY (2017) Emission trading and carbon market performance in Shenzhen, China. Appl Energy 193:414–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RGGI or Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (2012). http://www.rggi.org/. Accessed 21 July 2017

  • Sandbag Organization (2013) Drifting toward disaster: the EU ETS adrift in Europe’s climate efforts. http://www.sandbag.org.uk/site_media/pdfs/reports/Drifting_Towards_Disaster.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2017

  • Schneider L (2009) Assessing the additionality of CDM projects: practical experiences and lessons learned. Clim Policy 9(3):242–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan A, Kaidonis M, Moerman L (2008) Balancing the seesaw: how Australia’s carbon pollution reduction scheme can fail. In Proceedings of the 21st Australasian finance and banking conference, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi V, Schuknecht L (2000) Public spending in the 20th century: a global perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Truman E (2008) A blueprint for sovereign wealth fund best practices. Peterson Institute for International Economics. Number PB08-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasa A, Neuhoff K (2011) The role of CDM post-2012. Climate Policy Initiative/DIW, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Vikøren B (2008) Norges bank’s experiences with the organization of the government pension fund – global. In: Commodities, energy and finance. SUERF: The European Money and Finance Forum, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Wara M, Victor DG (2008) A realistic policy on international carbon offsets. Stanford Law School working paper. http://www.law.stanford.edu/publications/details/4032/. Accessed 21 July 2017

  • Waterloo Global Science Initiative (WGSI) (2012) Equinox blueprint: energy 2030. Waterloo Global Science Initiative, Waterloo

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshino N, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2017) Alternatives to bank finance: role of carbon tax and hometown investment trust funds in developing green energy projects in Asia. Asian Development Bank Institute working paper 761. Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshino N, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2018) Alternatives to private finance: role of fiscal policy reforms and energy taxation in development of renewable energy projects. In: Anbumozhi V, Kalirajan K, Kimura F (eds) Financing for low-carbon energy transition: unlocking the potential of private capital. Springer, New York, pp 335–357

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Li W, Li A (2017) Research on efficiency of carbon trading market in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 79:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jatin Nathwani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Asian Development Bank Institute

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Nathwani, J., Ng, A.W. (2019). A “Cap and Invest” Strategy for Managing the Intergenerational Burdens of Financing Energy Transitions. In: Sachs, J., Woo, W., Yoshino, N., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (eds) Handbook of Green Finance. Sustainable Development . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0227-5_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics