Skip to main content

Female Forced Migrants: Accountability Gaps in International Criminal Law

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Human Rights of Women

Part of the book series: International Human Rights ((IHR))

Abstract

Many commentators have celebrated international criminal law’s progress on gender issues, focusing on decisions that include serious forms of sexual violence within the scope of the law. Though these updates to the doctrine may be commendable, this chapter raises a broader ongoing concern: the gendered structure of international criminal law that diverts attention from other significant harms that women endure as a result of violent conflict. The chapter examines the accountability gaps suffered by female forced migrants fleeing situations of widespread violence to expose the gendered nature of the international criminal law framework. It walks through potential avenues to address and prevent violence against forced migrant women, describing the promise and peril of relying on international criminal law and offering alternative approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

Law and Cases

  • Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 10 December 1984, 1465 UNTS 85

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, 28 July 1951, 189 UNTS 137

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzemajl v. Yugoslavia, 2 December 2002, UN Committee against Torture, UN Doc CAT/C/29/D/161/2000, paras 2.7–2.9, 8.9–8.10, 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam v. Secretary of State for the Home Department and Regina v. Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another Ex Parte Shah, 5 March 1999, UK House of Lords, p 17

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, 21 March 2016, Trial Chamber III Judgment, Case No. ICC-01/05–01/08, para 161

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosecutor v. Jean Paul Akayesu, 2 September 1998, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Case No. ICTR-96-4-T

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosecutor v. Katanga, 17 March 2014, Trial Chamber II Judgment, Case No. ICC-01/04–01/07, para 1109

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosecutor v. Kunarac, 12 June 2002, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Appeal Chamber, Case No. IT-96-23 & IT-96-23/1-A, para 98

    Google Scholar 

  • Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1 July 2002, 2187 UNTS 90

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of this chapter was published as Questioning Hierarchies of Harm: Women, Forced Migration, and International Criminal Law in 11 Int’l Crim. L. Rev. 463 (2011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaya Ramji-Nogales .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ramji-Nogales, J., DerOhannesian, D. (2019). Female Forced Migrants: Accountability Gaps in International Criminal Law. In: Reilly, N. (eds) International Human Rights of Women. International Human Rights. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8905-3_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics