Skip to main content

Communication for Development and Social Change: In Search of a New Paradigm

Abstract

This chapter outlines three development paradigms which are still being applied in theory and praxis: modernization, dependency, and multiplicity. It then argues that these paradigms determine the way two dominant communication models have emerged. Each development paradigm and communication model leads to divergent policy options at different levels of societal change: local, national, international, global.

The right to communication is presented as a translation of the communication policy of the multiplicity paradigm. This principle, as a fundamental human right, clearly indicates that another communication model necessitates democratization and thus a redistribution of the power on all levels. The point of departure is not an elitist position but development from the grass roots.

Keywords

  • Modernization
  • Dependency
  • Multiplicity
  • Diffusion model
  • Participatory communication
  • Policies
  • Right to communicate

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Bourdieu P (1979) La distinction: critique sociale du jugement. Éditions de Minuit, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1980) Questions de sociologie. Minuit, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown K (2016) Resilience, development and global change. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier N, Lie R, Servaes J (2012) Multitheoretical approaches to community media: capturing specificity and diversity. In: Fuller L (ed) The power of global community media. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 219–236

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cuellar JP (1995) Our creative diversity. Report of the World Commission on Culture and Development. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1976) New rules of sociological method. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon D, Merrill J (1988) A power theory of press freedom, Paper ICA conference, New Orleans, May

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafez K (2007) The myth of media globalization. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamelink CJ (2004) Human rights for communicators. Hampton Press, Cresskill

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne B (1990) Development theory and the three worlds. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper P (2007) Understanding cultural globalization. Polity, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Enlarged (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lie R (2003) Spaces of intercultural communication. Hampton Press, Cresskill

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBride S (ed) (1980) Many voices, one world. Communication and society. Today and tomorrow. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail D (2005) McQuails mass communication theory, 5th edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenstreng K, Schiller HI (red) (1993) Beyond national sovereignty: international communication in the 1990s. Ablex, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Pool IDS (1983) Technologies of freedom. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren KE (1981) Mass media and social change: some current approaches. In: Katz E, Szecsko T (eds) Mass media and social change. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren KE (2000) Communication. An introduction. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte J (2005) Globalization: a critical introduction. Palgrave, New York

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Servaes J (1999) Communication for development. One world, multiple cultures. Hampton Press, Cresskill

    Google Scholar 

  • Servaes J (ed) (2008) Communication for development and social change. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Servaes J (2015) Studying the global from within the local. Commun Res Pract 1(3):242–250

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Servaes J (2017) All human rights are local. The resiliency of social change. In: Tumber H, Waisbord S (eds) The Routledge companion to media and human rights. Routledge, London, pp 136–146

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Servaes J, Oyedemi T (eds) (2016) Social inequalities, media and communication. Theory and roots. Lexington, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks C (2007) Globalization, development and the mass media. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehranian M (1979) Development theory and communication policy. The changing paradigm. In: Voigt M, Hanneman G (eds) Progress in communication sciences, vol 1. Ablex, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Servaes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Servaes, J. (2019). Communication for Development and Social Change: In Search of a New Paradigm. In: Servaes, J. (eds) Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7035-8_108-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7035-8_108-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7035-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7035-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Literature, Cultural & Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences