Nanoindentation and Indentation Size Effects: Continuum Model and Atomistic Simulation
Nanoindentation is one of the most widely used methods to measure the mechanical properties of materials at the nanoscale. For spherical indenters, when radius decreases, the hardness increases. The phenomenon is known as the indentation size effect (ISE). Nix and Gao developed a continuum model to explain the ISE in microindentation. However, the model overestimates the hardness at the nanoscale. The objective of this study is to develop proper methods to probe key quantities such as hardness and geometric necessary dislocation (GND) density from the quasi-static version of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and to develop a mechanism-based model to elucidate the ISE phenomenon at the nanoscale. A reliable method is presented to extract the GND directly from dislocation length and the volume of plastic zone in the MD simulations. We conclude that the hardness determined directly from MD simulations matches well with the hardness determined from the Oliver–Pharr method. The ISE can be observed directly from the MD simulations without any free parameters. The model by Swadener et al. rooted from the Nix and Gao model underestimates the GND density at the nanoscale. However, this model can accurately predict the hardness size effects in nanoindentation if it uses the GND density directly calculated from the MD simulations.
KeywordsNanoindentation size effect Molecular dynamics simulations Geometrically necessary dislocation density Hardness
This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan. We are also grateful to the National Center for High-Performance Computing for providing the computational resources required for this study.
- 4.Fischer-Cripps AC, SpringerLink (Online service). Nanoindentation. 3rd ed. Mechanical engineering series 1. New York: Springer; 2011. Google Scholar
- 14.Greer JR. Bridging the gap between computational and experimental length scales: a review on nanoscale plasticity. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2006;13(1):59–70.Google Scholar
- 51.Ackland GJ, Jones AP. Applications of local crystal structure measures in experiment and simulation. PhRvB. 2006;73(5). Google Scholar
- 53.Shewchuk JR. Triangle: Engineering a 2D quality mesh generator and Delaunay triangulator. 1996;1148:203–22. Google Scholar
- 54.Taylor GI. Plastic strain in metals. J Inst Met. 1938;62:307–24.Google Scholar
- 55.Dieter GE, Bacon DJ. Mechanical metallurgy. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1988.Google Scholar
- 56.Plimpton S. Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics. JCoPh. 1995;117(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1039.