Abstract
How trade openness results in higher economic growth has been one of the most contested issues both theoretically and empirically. The mainstream views that more trade does help in achieving higher growth. However, there has been growing consensus in recent years on the importance of linking trade-growth nexus with the complementary regulatory policies. In this chapter, we have reassessed the role of complementary reforms, such as labor market flexibility, competitive industrial policy (CIP), and business environment, in enhancing the benefits of trade on growth.
Our results based on both Quantile and GMM regression models, employing data on 54 developing countries for the 2006–2013 period, do support the fact that trade openness does contribute to faster growth. However, our empirical results also support that the marginal impact of openness is significantly enhanced with the implementation of complementary regulatory framework that includes competitive business/investment environment and more flexible labor market conditions.
References
Alcalá F, Ciccone A (2004) Trade and productivity. Q J Econ 119(2):613–646
Alvarez J, Arellano M (2003) The time series and cross-section asymptotics of dynamic panel data estimators. Econometrica 71(4):1121–1159
Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econ 68(1):29–51
Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297
Astorga P (2010) A century of economic growth in Latin America. J Dev Econ 92(2):232–243
Awokuse TO, Christopoulos DK (2009) Nonlinear dynamics and the exports–output growth nexus. Econ Model 26(1):184–190
Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1995) Economic growth. Mcgraw-Hill, New York
Basu P, Guariglia A (2007) Foreign direct investment, inequality, and growth. J Macroecon 29(4):824–839
Billmeier A, Nannicini T (2009) Trade openness and growth: Pursuing empirical glasnost. IMF Econ Rev 56(3):447–475
Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econ 87(1):115–143
Bound J, Jaeger DA, Baker RM (1995) Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. J Am Stat Assoc 90(430):443–450
Chang R, Kaltani L, Loayza NV (2009) Openness can be good for growth: The role of policy complementarities. J Dev Econ 90(1):33–49
Chen LA, Portnoy S (1996) Two-stage regression quantiles and two-stage trimmed least squares estimators for structural equation models. CommunStat Theory Methods 25(5):1005–1032
Choi I (2001) Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Financ 20(2):249–272
Chowdhury A (2008) Labor market policies as instruments of industry policy: what can Europe learn from Southeast Asia? Am J Econ Sociol 67(4):661–681
Devarajan S, Rodrik D (1989) Trade liberalization in developing countries: do imperfect competition and scale economies matter? Am Econ Rev 79(2):283–287
Diop A, Dufrénot G, Sanon G (2010) Is per capita growth in Africa hampered by poor governance and weak institutions? An empirical study on the ECOWAS countries. Afr Dev Rev 22(2):265–275
Dollar D (1992) Outward-oriented developing economies really do grow more rapidly: evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976–1985. Econ Dev Cult Chang 40(3):523–544
Dowrick S, Golley J (2004) Trade openness and growth: who benefits? Oxf Rev Econ Policy 20(1):38–56
Dufrénot G, Mignon V, Tsangarides C (2010) The trade-growth nexus in the developing countries: a quantile regression approach. Rev World Econ 146(4):731–761
Economidou C, Murshid AP (2008) Testing the linkages between trade and productivity growth. Rev Dev Econ 12(4):845–860
Frankel JA, Romer D (1999) Does trade cause growth? Am Econ Rev:379–399
Freund C, Bolaky B (2008) Trade, regulations, and income. J Dev Econ 87(2):309–321
Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Huang H-C, Miller S (2014) Does financial development volatility affect industrial growth volatility? Int Rev Econ Financ 29:307–320
Jalil A, Mahmud S, Hammad H (2015) A revisit to trade-growth nexus: evidence from heterogeneous panel methods, Working Paper
Jin JC (2006) Can openness be an engine of sustained high growth rates and inflation?: evidence from Japan and Korea. Int Rev Econ Finance 15(2):228–240
Kim DH, Lin SC, Suen YB (2011) Nonlinearity between trade openness and economic development. Rev Dev Econ 15(2):279–292
Kneller R, Yu Z (2008) Quality selection, Chinese exports and theories of heterogeneous firm trade. University of Nottingham, GEP Research Paper, 44
Kose MA, Prasad E, Rogoff K, Wei SJ, Rodrik D, Rosenzweig MR (2010) Handbook of development economics. In: Financial globalization and economic policies, vol 5. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 4283–4359
Loayza N, Fajnzylber P, Calderón C (2004) Economic growth in Latin America and the Caribbean: stylized facts, explanations, and forecasts, vol 265. Banco Central de Chile
Matsuyama K (1992) Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage, and economic growth. J Econ Theory 58(2):317–334
Menyah K, Nazlioglu S, Wolde-Rufael Y (2014) Financial development, trade openness and economic growth in African countries: new insights from a panel causality approach. Econ Model 37:386–394
Misati RN, Nyamongo EM (2011) Financial development and private investment in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Econ Bus 63(2):139–151
Pack H, Saggi K (2006a) Is there a case for industrial policy? A critical survey. World Bank Res Obs 21(2):267
Pack H, Saggi K (2006) The case for industrial policy: a critical survey, vol 3839. World Bank Publications
Pavcnik N (2002) Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvements: evidence from Chilean plants. Rev Econ Stud 69(1):245–276
Powell JL (1983) The asymptotic normality of two-stage least absolute deviations estimators. Econometrica:1569–1575
Rodriguez F, Rodrik D (2000) Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence. NBER Macroecon Annu 15:261–325, Cambridge, USA
Rodrik D, Hausmann R (2006) In first Blue Sky Seminar. Organized by the Center for International Development at Harvard University, Cambridge, September. Doomed to choose: industrial policy as predicament
Sachs JD, Warner AM (1995) Economic convergence and economic policies (No w5039). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
Tahir M, Haji DHNBP, Ali O (2014) Trade openness and economic growth: a review of the literature. Asian Soc Sci 10(9):137
Villanueva D (1994) Openness, human development and scal policies. IMF Staff Pap 41:129
Weiss J (2013) Strategic industrial policy and business environment reform. DCED, Working paper June
Yanikkaya H (2003) Trade openness and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation. J Dev Econ 72(1):57–89
Zagha R, Nankani G, Gill I (2006) Rethinking growth. Financ Dev 43(1):7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Sources and Explanation of Variables
Variable | Definition and construction of variable | Source of data |
---|---|---|
GDP per capita (y) | Log of per capita GDP | World Development Indicators (2013) |
Trade openness (trade) | Two measures: Trade to GDP and Index of Tariffs | World Development Indicator (2013) and www.heritage.org |
Financial depth | Credit to private sector to GDP and number of bank branches per 100, 000 have been taken to proxies to financial openness | World Development Indicator (2013) |
Physical capital (cap) | The data on capital series is not directly available. Therefore, the researchers use perpetual inventory methodology for generating the capital series. We also use the same methodology for each country. For this purpose the initial value is calculated by assuming 4% deprecation | Data on investment is taken World Development Indicators (2013) |
Inflation rate (interest) | Inflation is calculated by taking the log difference of consumer price index numbers | The data on consumer price index number is from World Development Indicators (2013) |
FDI | Foreign Direct Investment | World Development Indicators (2013) |
Population growth | Annual growth of population in percentage | World Development Indicators (2013) |
Governance | Here we use composite index of governance (PRS) based on different indicators: Voice and accountability, political stability, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, control of corruption | World Development Indicators (2013) |
List of Countries
Albania | Madagascar |
Algeria | Malaysia |
Argentina | Mexico |
Armenia | Moldova |
Azerbaijan | Mongolia |
Bahamas, The | Namibia |
Bolivia | Nigeria |
Botswana | Oman |
Brazil | Pakistan |
Bulgaria | Panama |
Cameroon | Paraguay |
Chile | Peru |
Colombia | Philippines |
Costa Rica | Poland |
Croatia | Romania |
Ecuador | Russian Federation |
Egypt, Arab Republic | Senegal |
El Salvador | Serbia |
Gabon | South Africa |
Guatemala | Tanzania |
Honduras | Tunisia |
India | Turkey |
Indonesia | Ukraine |
Iran, Islamic Republic | United Arab Emirates |
Jordan | Uruguay |
Kazakhstan | Vietnam |
Kenya | |
Lebanon |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mahmud, S.F., Ishnazorov, D. (2018). Trade-Growth Nexus and Industrial Policy. In: Yülek, M. (eds) Industrial Policy and Sustainable Growth. Sustainable Development . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5741-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5741-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5740-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5741-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences