Skip to main content

Trade-Growth Nexus and Industrial Policy

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Industrial Policy and Sustainable Growth

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development ((SD))

  • 1170 Accesses

Abstract

How trade openness results in higher economic growth has been one of the most contested issues both theoretically and empirically. The mainstream views that more trade does help in achieving higher growth. However, there has been growing consensus in recent years on the importance of linking trade-growth nexus with the complementary regulatory policies. In this chapter, we have reassessed the role of complementary reforms, such as labor market flexibility, competitive industrial policy (CIP), and business environment, in enhancing the benefits of trade on growth.

Our results based on both Quantile and GMM regression models, employing data on 54 developing countries for the 2006–2013 period, do support the fact that trade openness does contribute to faster growth. However, our empirical results also support that the marginal impact of openness is significantly enhanced with the implementation of complementary regulatory framework that includes competitive business/investment environment and more flexible labor market conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alcalá F, Ciccone A (2004) Trade and productivity. Q J Econ 119(2):613–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez J, Arellano M (2003) The time series and cross-section asymptotics of dynamic panel data estimators. Econometrica 71(4):1121–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econ 68(1):29–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astorga P (2010) A century of economic growth in Latin America. J Dev Econ 92(2):232–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awokuse TO, Christopoulos DK (2009) Nonlinear dynamics and the exports–output growth nexus. Econ Model 26(1):184–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1995) Economic growth. Mcgraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu P, Guariglia A (2007) Foreign direct investment, inequality, and growth. J Macroecon 29(4):824–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billmeier A, Nannicini T (2009) Trade openness and growth: Pursuing empirical glasnost. IMF Econ Rev 56(3):447–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econ 87(1):115–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bound J, Jaeger DA, Baker RM (1995) Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. J Am Stat Assoc 90(430):443–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang R, Kaltani L, Loayza NV (2009) Openness can be good for growth: The role of policy complementarities. J Dev Econ 90(1):33–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen LA, Portnoy S (1996) Two-stage regression quantiles and two-stage trimmed least squares estimators for structural equation models. CommunStat Theory Methods 25(5):1005–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi I (2001) Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Financ 20(2):249–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury A (2008) Labor market policies as instruments of industry policy: what can Europe learn from Southeast Asia? Am J Econ Sociol 67(4):661–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devarajan S, Rodrik D (1989) Trade liberalization in developing countries: do imperfect competition and scale economies matter? Am Econ Rev 79(2):283–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Diop A, Dufrénot G, Sanon G (2010) Is per capita growth in Africa hampered by poor governance and weak institutions? An empirical study on the ECOWAS countries. Afr Dev Rev 22(2):265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar D (1992) Outward-oriented developing economies really do grow more rapidly: evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976–1985. Econ Dev Cult Chang 40(3):523–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowrick S, Golley J (2004) Trade openness and growth: who benefits? Oxf Rev Econ Policy 20(1):38–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufrénot G, Mignon V, Tsangarides C (2010) The trade-growth nexus in the developing countries: a quantile regression approach. Rev World Econ 146(4):731–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economidou C, Murshid AP (2008) Testing the linkages between trade and productivity growth. Rev Dev Econ 12(4):845–860

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel JA, Romer D (1999) Does trade cause growth? Am Econ Rev:379–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund C, Bolaky B (2008) Trade, regulations, and income. J Dev Econ 87(2):309–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang H-C, Miller S (2014) Does financial development volatility affect industrial growth volatility? Int Rev Econ Financ 29:307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalil A, Mahmud S, Hammad H (2015) A revisit to trade-growth nexus: evidence from heterogeneous panel methods, Working Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin JC (2006) Can openness be an engine of sustained high growth rates and inflation?: evidence from Japan and Korea. Int Rev Econ Finance 15(2):228–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH, Lin SC, Suen YB (2011) Nonlinearity between trade openness and economic development. Rev Dev Econ 15(2):279–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneller R, Yu Z (2008) Quality selection, Chinese exports and theories of heterogeneous firm trade. University of Nottingham, GEP Research Paper, 44

    Google Scholar 

  • Kose MA, Prasad E, Rogoff K, Wei SJ, Rodrik D, Rosenzweig MR (2010) Handbook of development economics. In: Financial globalization and economic policies, vol 5. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 4283–4359

    Google Scholar 

  • Loayza N, Fajnzylber P, Calderón C (2004) Economic growth in Latin America and the Caribbean: stylized facts, explanations, and forecasts, vol 265. Banco Central de Chile

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuyama K (1992) Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage, and economic growth. J Econ Theory 58(2):317–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menyah K, Nazlioglu S, Wolde-Rufael Y (2014) Financial development, trade openness and economic growth in African countries: new insights from a panel causality approach. Econ Model 37:386–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misati RN, Nyamongo EM (2011) Financial development and private investment in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Econ Bus 63(2):139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pack H, Saggi K (2006a) Is there a case for industrial policy? A critical survey. World Bank Res Obs 21(2):267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pack H, Saggi K (2006) The case for industrial policy: a critical survey, vol 3839. World Bank Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavcnik N (2002) Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvements: evidence from Chilean plants. Rev Econ Stud 69(1):245–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell JL (1983) The asymptotic normality of two-stage least absolute deviations estimators. Econometrica:1569–1575

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez F, Rodrik D (2000) Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence. NBER Macroecon Annu 15:261–325, Cambridge, USA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik D, Hausmann R (2006) In first Blue Sky Seminar. Organized by the Center for International Development at Harvard University, Cambridge, September. Doomed to choose: industrial policy as predicament

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs JD, Warner AM (1995) Economic convergence and economic policies (No w5039). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tahir M, Haji DHNBP, Ali O (2014) Trade openness and economic growth: a review of the literature. Asian Soc Sci 10(9):137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva D (1994) Openness, human development and scal policies. IMF Staff Pap 41:129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss J (2013) Strategic industrial policy and business environment reform. DCED, Working paper June

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanikkaya H (2003) Trade openness and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation. J Dev Econ 72(1):57–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagha R, Nankani G, Gill I (2006) Rethinking growth. Financ Dev 43(1):7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed F. Mahmud .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Sources and Explanation of Variables

Variable

Definition and construction of variable

Source of data

GDP per capita (y)

Log of per capita GDP

World Development Indicators (2013)

Trade openness (trade)

Two measures: Trade to GDP and Index of Tariffs

World Development Indicator (2013) and www.heritage.org

Financial depth

Credit to private sector to GDP and number of bank branches per 100, 000 have been taken to proxies to financial openness

World Development Indicator (2013)

Physical capital (cap)

The data on capital series is not directly available. Therefore, the researchers use perpetual inventory methodology for generating the capital series. We also use the same methodology for each country. For this purpose the initial value is calculated by assuming 4% deprecation

Data on investment is taken World Development Indicators (2013)

Inflation rate (interest)

Inflation is calculated by taking the log difference of consumer price index numbers

The data on consumer price index number is from World Development Indicators (2013)

FDI

Foreign Direct Investment

World Development Indicators (2013)

Population growth

Annual growth of population in percentage

World Development Indicators (2013)

Governance

Here we use composite index of governance (PRS) based on different indicators: Voice and accountability, political stability, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, control of corruption

World Development Indicators (2013)

List of Countries

Albania

Madagascar

Algeria

Malaysia

Argentina

Mexico

Armenia

Moldova

Azerbaijan

Mongolia

Bahamas, The

Namibia

Bolivia

Nigeria

Botswana

Oman

Brazil

Pakistan

Bulgaria

Panama

Cameroon

Paraguay

Chile

Peru

Colombia

Philippines

Costa Rica

Poland

Croatia

Romania

Ecuador

Russian Federation

Egypt, Arab Republic

Senegal

El Salvador

Serbia

Gabon

South Africa

Guatemala

Tanzania

Honduras

Tunisia

India

Turkey

Indonesia

Ukraine

Iran, Islamic Republic

United Arab Emirates

Jordan

Uruguay

Kazakhstan

Vietnam

Kenya

 

Lebanon

 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mahmud, S.F., Ishnazorov, D. (2018). Trade-Growth Nexus and Industrial Policy. In: Yülek, M. (eds) Industrial Policy and Sustainable Growth. Sustainable Development . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5741-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics