Advertisement

Regulation as Intervention: How Regulatory Design Can Affect Practices and Behaviours in the Workplace

Living reference work entry
Part of the Handbooks of Workplace Bullying, Emotional Abuse and Harassment book series (HWBEAH, volume 3)

Abstract

This chapter explores the ways in which regulatory measures affect workplace practices that contribute to or impede the development of workplace bullying. It begins with an examination of the concept of regulation, looking at regulation by the state, as well as by non-state actors that perform a regulatory function. In the second part, to illustrate the concept of regulation as an intervention, we will draw on experiences from the implementation of the legal regime in Québec to show how a regulatory regime can lead to the mobilization of different categories of actors to perform different types of activities in and outside the workplace. The third part of this chapter provides a synthesis of the issues that need to be discussed in the choice of regulatory instruments, to ensure that the legal environment promotes practices that are known to have a positive impact on the workplace and concretely contribute to the reduction of the causes of workplace bullying and harassment.

Keywords

Québec Regulation Intervention Effects of legislation Trade union Psychosocial risk factors Workers’ compensation Occupational Health and Safety Mental health Inspectorates 

References

  1. Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2009). Why is organizational change related to workplace bullying? Role conflict and job insecurity as mediators. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 30(3), 348–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry, M. (2010). The regulative framework for HRM. In A. Wilkinson, N. Bacon, T. Redman, & S. Snell (Eds.), Handbook of human resource management (pp. 71–83). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black, J. (2002). Critical reflections on regulation. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 27, 1–35.Google Scholar
  4. Black, J. (2008). Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation & Governance, 2, 137–164. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/law/wps/wps.htmCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonde, J. P., Gullander, M., Hansen, Å. M., Grynderup, M., Persson, R., Hogh, A., et al. (2016). Health correlates of workplace bullying: A 3-wave prospective follow-up study. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 42(1), 17–25.  https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruhn, A., & Frick, K. (2011). Why it was so difficult to develop new methods to inspect work organization and psychosocial risks in Sweden. Safety Science, 49(4), 575–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canadian National Standard. (2013). Psychological health and safety in the workplace – Prevention, promotion, and guidance to staged implementation. http://shop.csa.ca/en/canada/occupational-health-and-safety-management/cancsa-z1003-13bnq-9700-8032013/invt/z10032013. CAN/CSA-Z1003-13/BNQ 9700-803/2013.
  8. Caponecchia, C., & Costa, D. S. J. (2017). Examining workplace bullying measurement using item response theory. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(4), 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carbo, J. (2009). Strengthening the Healthy Workplace Act – Lessons from title VII and IIED litigation and stories of targets’ experiences. Journal of Workplace Rights, 14(1), 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casas Becerra, L. (2016). The effectiveness of the sexual harassment law in Chile: From theory to practice. Doctoral thesis in Law, University of Ottawa, Ottawa. https://ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/34670
  11. Cazi, E. (2018, June 19). Suicide à France Télécom: les ex-dirigeants renvoyés devant le tribunal pour harcèlement moral. Le Monde. http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2016/07/07/suicides-le-parquet-demande-le-renvoi-de-la-direction-de-france-telecom-pour-harcelement-moral_4965171_3224.html
  12. Centre hospitalier régional de Trois-Rivières et Syndicat professionnel des infirmières et infirmiers de Trois Rivières. (2006). R.J.D.T. 397, para 260.Google Scholar
  13. Chan-Mok, J. O., Caponecchia, C., & Winder, C. (2014). The concept of workplace bullying: Implications from Australian Workplace Health and Safety Law. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21, 442–456. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13218719.2013.829399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chouinard, T., & Lessard, D. (2017, September 7). Rien ne va plus dans Louis-Hébert. La Presse. http://plus.lapresse.ca/screens/fc2c97f8-4cd3-4aaf-8000-cbb5f0f6f9a3%7C_0.html
  15. Conforti v. Investia Financial Services and Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc. (2011). CanLII 60897 (ONLRB).Google Scholar
  16. Coutu, M., Fontaine, L. L., & Marceau, G. (2009). Droit des rapports collectifs du travail au Québec. Cowansville: Éditions Yvon Blais.Google Scholar
  17. Cox, R. (2010). Psychological harassment legislation in Québec: The first five years. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 32(1), 55–89.Google Scholar
  18. Cox, R. (2014). Les effets du rôle accordé aux syndicats par le projet de loi 143 sur la mise en oeuvre et la réception du droit à un milieu de travail exempt de harcèlement psychologique ainsi que sur l’action syndicale au Québec. Doctoral thesis in Law, University of Ottawa, Ottawa. https://ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/31166
  19. Cox, R. (2015). Québec unions’ role with respect to complaints of psychological harassment in the workplace: The peril and promise of implementing individual rights through collective labour relations. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 13(2), 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cox, R. (2017). The right to a work environment free from psychological harassment under Quebec’s Labour Standards Act. In L. Lerouge (Ed.), Psychosocial risks in labour and social security law (pp. 215–242). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. CROP Inc. (2009). Notoriété d’une loi sur le harcèlement psychologique (Rapport préparé pour l’Ordre des conseillers en ressources humaines agréées). http://www.orhri.org/communique/2009-2010/pdf/20090531_harcelement.pdf
  22. D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2013). Navigating the extended reach: Target experiences of cyberbullying at work. Information and Organization, 23(4), 324–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2014). The interface between technology and customer cyberbullying: Evidence from India. Information and Organization, 24(3), 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2016). The Dutch Working Conditions Act: Insights from key informants. Project report, October 2016.Google Scholar
  25. D’Cruz, P., Paull, M., Omari, M., & Guneri-Cangarli, B. (2016). Target experiences of workplace bullying: Insights from Australia, India and Turkey. Employee Relations, 38(5), 805–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Duffy, M. (2009). Preventing workplace mobbing and bullying with effective organizational consultation, policies, and legislation. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 61(3), 242–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dupéré, C. (2009). Pour en connaître davantage sur les personnes ayant porté plainte pour harcèlement psychologique à la Commission des normes du travail. Reg@rds sur le travail, 5(2), 40–45.Google Scholar
  28. Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2011). The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Development in theory, research and practice (pp. 3–39). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  29. European Social Partners. (2007a). Implementation reports of the European Framework Agreement on work-related stress 2007. European Social Partners – ETUC, BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME and CEEP, Brussels. http://www.etuc.org/a/3870. Accessed 12 June 2009.
  30. European Social Partners. (2007b). Framework agreement on harassment and violence at work. European Social Partners – ETUC, BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME and CEEP, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/news/2007/apr/harassment_violence_at_work_en.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2009.
  31. Fair Work Commission of Australia. (2017). Quarterly reports: Anti-bullying report, 2017. https://wip.fwc.gov.au/about-us/reports-publications/quarterly-reports
  32. Fevre, R., Robinson, A., Jones, T., & Lewis, D. (2010). Researching workplace bullying: The benefits of taking an integrated approach. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Garcia, A., Hue, C., Opde-Beeck, S., & Van Looy, J. (2003). Violences au travail, harcèlement moral et sexuel: Synthèse de la recherche sur les caractéristiques et les conséquences pour les travailleurs féminins et masculins (p. 47). Bruxelles: SPF Emploi, Travail et Concertation sociale. http://www.meta.fgov.be
  34. Gillen, P. A., Sinclair, M., Kernohan, W. G., Begley, C. M., & Luyben, A. G. (2017). Interventions for prevention of bullying in the workplace (p. 69). Wiley. The Cochrane Library.Google Scholar
  35. Giroux F., & Paquette J. (2011). Les pouvoirs de réparation en matière de harcèlement psychologique: l’expérience de la Commission des relations du travail. Présentation à la Conférence des arbitres du Québec, 16 avril 2011, Mont-Saint-Hilaire, Québec.Google Scholar
  36. Gitahy da Paixão, J. (2012). El acoso laboral en el ordenamiento jurídico del Brasil: marco legal y fallos recientes (pp. 123–140). Santiago: Revista Estudios Laborales.Google Scholar
  37. Glass, N., Hanson, G. C., Anger, W. K., Laharnar, N., Campbell, J. C., Weinstein, M., et al. (2017). Computer-based training (CBT) intervention reduces workplace violence and harassment for homecare workers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 60, 635–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gullander, M., Hogh, A., Hansen, A. M., Persson, R., Rugulies, R., Kolstad, H. A., et al. (2014). Exposure to workplace bullying and risk of depression. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56(12), 1258–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hanley, G. M., & O’Rourke, A. (2016). The race without a finishing line: Legislative means for confronting bullying in the Australian workplace. Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 54, 352–368.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hart, S. M. (2012). Labour arbitration of co-worker sexual harassment cases in Canada. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29, 268–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hirigoyen, M.-F. (2017). Le harcèlement moral au travail. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  42. Hoel, H., & Einarsen, S. (2009). Shortcomings of antibullying regulations: The case of Sweden. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320802643665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hoel, H., & Einarsen, S. (2010). The Swedish ordinance against victimisation at work: A critical assessment. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 32(1), 225–249.Google Scholar
  44. Hogh, A., Mikkelsen, E. G., & Hansen, A. M. (2011). Individual consequences of workplace bullying/mobbing. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Development in theory, research and practice (pp. 107–128). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  45. Iavicoli, S., Leka, S., Jain, A., Persechino, B., Rondinone, B. M., Ronchetti, M., et al. (2014). Hard and soft law approaches to addressing psychosocial risks in Europe: Lessons learned in the development of the Italian approach. Journal of Risk Research, 17(7), 855–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. International Labour Office. (2016). Psychosocial risks, stress and violence in the world of work. International Journal of Labour Research, 8(1–2), 1–131.Google Scholar
  47. Jespersen, A. H., Hasle, P., & Nielsen, K. T. (2016). The wicked character of psychosocial risks: Implications for regulation. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 6(3), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Johnstone, R. (2016). Labour law: A regulatory perspective. In A. Stewart, A. Forsyth, M. Irving, R. Johnstone, & S. McCrystal (Eds.), Creighton & Stewart’s labour law (pp. 19–44). Sydney: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
  49. Johnstone, R. (2017). The Australian regulatory framework for preventing harassment and bullying at work. In L. Lerouge (Ed.), Psychosocial risks in labour and social security law. A comparative legal overview from Europe, North America, Australia and Japan (pp. 253–268). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Johnstone, R., Quinlan, M., & McNamara, M. (2011). OHS inspectors and psychosocial risk factors: Evidence from Australia. Safety Science, 49, 547–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kilgour, E., Kosny, A., McKenzie, D., & Collie, A. (2015a). Healing or harming? Healthcare provider interactions with injured workers and insurers in workers’ compensation systems. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 25(1), 220–239.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9521-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kilgour, E., Kosny, A., Akkermans, A., & Collie, A. (2015b). Procedural justice and the use of independent medical evaluations in workers’ compensation. Psychological Injury and Law, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-015-9222-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. King, A. (2017). Occupational health and safety inspection in Ontario: Overview of legal issues. Unpublished report on file with the authors. 39 p.Google Scholar
  54. Kunyk, D., Craig-Broadwith, M., Morris, H., Diaz, R., Reisdorfer, E., & Wang, J. (2016). Employers’ perceptions and attitudes toward the Canadian national standard on psychological health and safety in the workplace: A qualitative study. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 44(1), 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. LaMontagne, A. D., Keegel, T., Louie, A. M., & Ostry, A. (2010). Job stress as a preventable upstream determinant of common mental disorders: A review for practitioners and policy-makers. Advances in Mental Health, 9(1), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. LaMontagne, A., Martin, A., Page, K., Reavley, N., Noblet, A., Milner, A., et al. (2014). Workplace mental health: Developing an integrated intervention approach. BMC Psychiatry, 14(1), 131.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-131.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Leka, S., Jain, A., Iavicoli, S., Vartia-Väänänen, M., & Ertel, M. (2011). The role of policy for the management of psychosocial risks at the workplace in the European Union. Safety Science, 49(4), 558–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Leka, S., Jain, A., & Lerouge, L. (2017). Work-related psychosocial risks: Key definitions and an overview of the policy context in Europe. In L. Lerouge (Ed.), Psychosocial risks in labour and social security law (pp. 1–12). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  59. Lemmens, L., & Lysy, B. (2016). Le ministère public peut poursuivre les harceleurs sans plainte. Polifo.be, Kluwer. https://polinfo.kluwer.be/NewsView.aspx?id=VS300414966&contentdomains=POLINFO&lang=fr. Consulted 2 Mar 2018.
  60. Lerouge, L. (2010). Moral harassment in the workplace: French law and European perspectives. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 32(1), 109–152.Google Scholar
  61. Lerouge, L. (Ed.). (2017). Psychosocial risks in labour and social security law. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  62. Lippel, K. (1999). Therapeutic and anti-therapeutic consequences of workers’ compensation systems. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22(5–6), 521–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lippel, K. (2007). Workers describe the effect of the workers’ compensation process on their health: A Quebec study. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30(4–5), 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lippel, K. (2010). The law of workplace bullying: An international overview. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 32(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  65. Lippel, K. (2016). Addressing occupational violence: An overview of policy considerations viewed through a gender lens (p. 83). Geneva: International Labour Office. Working Paper No. 5/2016. http://www.ilo.org/gender/Informationresources/Publications/WCMS_535656/lang%2D%2Den/index.htm
  66. Lippel, K. (2017). Workers’ compensation for work-related mental health problems: An overview of Québec law. In L. Lerouge (Ed.), Psychosocial risks in labour and social security law (pp. 291–304). Cham: Springer. http://www.springer.com/in/book/9783319630632Google Scholar
  67. Lippel, K. (in press). Regulating to prevent workplace violence: Starting with its roots. In J. Fudge & E. Tucker (Eds.), Law with class: Essays inspired by Harry Glasbeek. Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  68. Lippel, K., & Sikka, A. (2010). Access to workers’ compensation benefits and other legal protections for work-related mental health problems: A Canadian overview. Revue canadienne de santé publique/Canadian Journal of Public Health, 101(S.1), S-16–S-22.Google Scholar
  69. Lippel, K., Vézina, M., & Cox, R. (2011). Protection of workers’ mental health in Québec: Do general duty clauses allow labour inspectors to do their job? Safety Science, 49, 582–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lippel, K., Vézina, M., Bourbonnais, R., & Funes, A. (2016). Workplace psychological harassment: Gendered exposures and implications for policy. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 46(1), 74–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lippel, K., Cox, R., & Aubé, I. (2018). Droit de la santé au travail régissant les problèmes de santé mentale: prévention, indemnisation et réadaptation In K. Lippel & G. Vallée (Eds.), Santé et sécurité du travail (Fascicule 27). Montréal: Lexis Nexis Canada.Google Scholar
  72. Memish, K., Martin, A., Bartlett, L., Dawkins, S., & Sanderson, K. (2017). Workplace mental health: An international review of guidelines. Preventive Medicine, 101, 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mental Health Commission of Canada. (2017). Case study research project findings: The National Standard of Canada for psychological health and safety in the workplace 2014–2017. Mental Health Commission of Canada. https://www.mentalhealthcommission.ca/sites/default/files/2017-03/case_study_research_project_findings_2017_eng.pdf
  74. Moreau, P., & Martel, N. (2007). Le recours pour défaut de représentation syndicale: Remèdes et développements jurisprudentiels devant la Commission des relations du travail. In Barreau du Québec (Ed.), Développements récents en droit du travail, 2007 (pp. 265–293). Cowansville: Éditions Yvon Blais.Google Scholar
  75. National Assembly of Quebec, Commission on the Economy and Labour. Debates, 36th leg, 2nd session, Vol. 37, n° 67 (Minister of Labour Jean Rochon, 11 December 2002).Google Scholar
  76. Neilsen, M. B., Notelaers, G., & Einarsen, S. (2011). Measuring exposure to workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Development in theory, research and practice (pp. 149–176). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  77. Ontario. (2009). An act to amend the Occupational Health and Safety Act with respect to violence and harassment in the workplace and other matters, 2009 S.O, c. 23 (Bill 168).Google Scholar
  78. Ontario. (2016). An act to amend various statutes with respect of sexual violence, sexual harassment, domestic violence and related matters, 2016 S.O. c. 2 (Bill 132).Google Scholar
  79. Pinkos Cobb, E. (2017). Workplace bullying and harassment: New developments in international law. London/New York: Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Porter, I., & Sioui, M.-M.. (2017, September 7). Louis-Hébert: Deux candidats perdus par leur passé. Le Devoir. http://www.ledevoir.com/politique/quebec/507407/eric-tetrault-se-retire-de-la-course-dans-louis-hebert
  81. Potter, R. E., Dollard, M. F., & Tuckey, M. R. (2016). Bullying & harassment in Australian workplaces: Results from the Australian workplace barometer project 2014/2015 (p. 19). Australia: Safe Work Australia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en
  82. Rasmussen, M., Hansen, T., & Nielsen, K. (2011). New tools and strategies for the inspection of the psychosocial working environment: The experience of the Danish Working Environment Authority. Safety Science, 49(4), 565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Salin, D., & Hoel, H. (2011). Organisational causes of workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Development in theory, research and practice (pp. 227–243). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  84. SPF Emploi, Travail et Concertation Sociale. (2011). Évaluation de la législation relative à la prévention de la charge psychosociale occasionnée par le travail, dont la violence et le harcèlement moral ou sexuel au travail. Bruxelles: SPF Emploi, Travail et Concertation Sociale. http://www.emploi.belgique.be/moduleDefault.aspx?id=34508
  85. Squelch, J., & Guthrie, R. (2010). The Australian legal framework for workplace bullying. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 32(1), 15–54.Google Scholar
  86. Tuckey, M. R., Dollard, M., Hosking, P. J., & Winefield, A. H. (2009). Workplace bullying: The role of psychosocial work environment factors. International Journal of Stress Management, 16(3), 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vartia, M., & Leka, S. (2011). Interventions for the prevention and management of bullying at work. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace (pp. 359–379). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  88. Velázquez, M. (2010). The Spanish code of practice on work-related bullying: Reflections on European law and its impact on a national strategy for labor inspectors. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 32(Fall), 185–224.Google Scholar
  89. Vickers, M. H. (2006). Towards employee wellness: Rethinking bullying paradoxes and masks. Employee Responsibilities and Rights, 18, 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Walters, D. (2011). Worker representation and psycho-social risks: A problematic relationship? Safety Science, 49(4), 599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Walters, D., Johnstone, R., Frick, K., Quinlan, M., Baril-Gingras, G., & Thébaud-Mony, A. (2011). Regulating workplace risks: A comparative study of inspection regimes in times of change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Waters, S. (2017). Workplace suicide and states of denial: The France Telecom and Foxconn cases compared. http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/801/967
  93. Weissbrodt, R. l., & Giauque, D. (2017). Labour inspections and the prevention of psychosocial risks at work: A realist synthesis. Safety Science, 100(Part A), 110–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Yamada, D. C. (2004). Crafting a legislative response to workplace bullying. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 8, 475–521.Google Scholar
  95. Yamada, D. C. (2010). Employment law as if people mattered: Bringing therapeutic jurisprudence into the workplace. Florida Coastal Law Review, 11(2), 257–288.Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Law (Civil Law Section), Canada Research Chair in Occupational Health and Safety LawUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Département des sciences juridiquesUniversité du Québec à MontréalQCCanada

Personalised recommendations