Skip to main content

Translational Research: Bridging the Chasm Between New Knowledge and Useful Knowledge

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 528 Accesses

Abstract

The failure to translate health research findings into practice costs lives. Less than 20% of research on the efficacy of new interventions or practices finds its way into ongoing clinical practice, and it takes between 15 and 20 years for this translation to occur. Translational research involves a series and combination of methods to achieve the nonlinear process of progressing basic scientific discovery to a healthcare intervention, to the assessment of efficacy of that intervention for health outcomes in trial groups, to the determination of effectiveness of the intervention in the broader population, and finally to the sustainable adoption of the effective practice at population scale. More simply put, translational research is the movement of basic science into human research and human research into healthcare practices: the former sometimes referred to as translational research and the latter as implementation research. This chapter will provide some clarity to the complex labeling and conceptualizing of translational and implementation research and their methodological frameworks including the characteristics and key procedures of research methods that facilitate quality and timely translation of interventions and programs, including hybrid and reflexive research designs, diffusion and dissemination research, and decision-making and policy research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   649.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarons GA, Green AE, Palinkas LA, Self-Brown S, Whitaker DJ, Lutzker JR, … Chaffin MJ. Dynamic adaptation process to implement an evidence-based child maltreatment intervention. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins MS, Frazier SL, Cappella E. Hybrid research models: natural opportunities for examining mental health in context. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2006;13(1):105–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00012.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government. National Innovation and Science Agenda: assessing the engagement and impact of university research. 2017. Retrieved from https://www.innovation.gov.au/page/measuring-impact-and-engagement-university-research

  • Bertram RM, Blase KA, Fixsen DL. Improving programs and outcomes: implementation frameworks and organization change. Res Soc Work Pract. 2015;25(4):477–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey A, Mackenzie M. Theories of change and realistic evaluation: peas in a pod or apples and oranges. Evaluation. 2007;13(4):439–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blase K, Kiser L, Van Dyke M. The hexagon tool: exploring context. 2013. Retrieved from http://implementation.fpg.unc.edu/resources/hexagon-tool-exploring-context

  • Bopp M, Saunders RP, Lattimore D. The tug-of-war: fidelity versus adaptation throughout the health promotion program life cycle. J Prim Prev. 2013;34(3):193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Dissemination and implementation research in health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci. 2007;2(1):40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro FG, Barrera M, Martinez CR. The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prev Sci. 2004;5(1):41–5. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000013980.12412.cd.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daro D, Boller K, Hart B. Implementation in early childhood home visiting: successes meeting staffing standards, challenges hitting dosage and duration targets. 2014. Retrieved from Chapin Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE. A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34(4):228–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. 2005. Retrieved from Tampa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flay BR. Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Prev Med. 1986;15(5):451–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flay BR, Biglan A, Boruch RF, Castro FG, Gottfredson D, Kellam S, … Ji P. Standards of evidence: criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prev Sci. 2005;6(3):151–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland AF, Hurlburt MS, Hawley KM. Examining psychotherapy processes in a services research context. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2006;13(1):30–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00004.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow RE, Magid D, Beck A, Ritzwoller D, Estabrooks P. Practical clinical trials for translating research to practice: design and measurement recommendations. Med Care. 2005;43(6):551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin M, Ruhland L, Casson I, MacDonald S, Delva D, Birtwhistle R, … Seguin R. Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomby DS. Understanding evaluations of home visitation programs. Future Child. 1999;9(1):27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomby DS. The promise and limitations of home visiting: implementing effective programs. Child Abuse Negl. 2007;31(8):793–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green LW. From research to “best practices” in other settings and populations. Am J Health Behavior. 2001;25(3):165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green LW. Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Fam Pract. 2008;25:i20–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green LW, Glasgow RE. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research. Issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof. 2006;29(1):126–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health program planning: an educational and ecological approach. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green LW, Ottoson JM, Garcia C, Hiatt RA. Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:151–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann AA, Shear MK. Community-based intervention research: coping with the “noise” of real life in study design. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(2):201–7. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.2.201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. The CTSA Program at NIH: opportunities for advancing clinical and translational research. 2013. Retrieved from Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardamanidis K, Kemp L, Schmied V. Uncovering psychosocial needs: perspectives of Australian child and family health nurses in a sustained home visiting trial. Contemp Nurse. 2009;33(1):50–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp L. Adaptation and fidelity: a recipe analogy for achieving both in population scale implementation. Prev Sci. 2016;17(4):429–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0642-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp L, Harris E. The challenges of establishing and researching a sustained nurse home visiting programme within the universal child and family health service system. J Res Nurs. 2012;17(2):127–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987111432228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp L, Anderson T, Travaglia J, Harris E. Sustained nurse home visiting in early childhood: exploring Australian nursing competencies. Public Health Nurs. 2005;22(3):254–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp L, Eisbacher L, McIntyre L, O’Sullivan K, Taylor J, Clark T, Harris E. Working in partnership in the antenatal period: what do child and family health nurses do? Contemp Nurse. 2006;23(2):312–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latimore AD, Burrell L, Crowne S, Ojo K, Cluxton-Keller F, Gustin S, … Duggan A. Exploring multilevel factors for family engagement in home visiting across two national models. Prev Sci. 2017; 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0767-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JE, Bumbarger BK, Cooper BR. Examining adaptations of evidence-based programs in natural contexts. J Prim Prev. 2013;34(3):147–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104(12):510–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowbray CT, Holter MC, Teague GB, Bybee D. Fidelity criteria: development, measurement, and validation. Am J Eval. 2003;24(3):315–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-2140(03)00057-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health. Definitions under Subsection 1 (Research Objectives), Section I (Funding Opportunity Description), Part II (Full Text of Announcement), of RFA-RM-07-007: Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award (U54). 2007. Retrieved from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-07-007.html

  • RE-AIM. 2017. Retrieved from http://re-aim.org/about/applying-the-re-aim-framework/

  • Robling M, Bekkers MJ, Bell K, Butler CC, Cannings-John R, Channon S, … Torgerson D. Effectiveness of a nurse-led intensive home-visitation programme for first-time teenage mothers (building blocks): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10014):146–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00392-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thase ME. A tale of two paradigms. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2006;13(1):94–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00010.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, Treweek S, Furberg CD, Altman DG, … Chalkidou K. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:464–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Health and Human Services. Finding the balance: program fidelity and adaptation in substance abuse prevention: a state-of-the-art review. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2008;299(2):211–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapart S, Knight J, Kemp L. ‘It was easier because I had help’: mothers’ reflections on the long-term impact of sustained nurse home visiting. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(1):196–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1819-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn Kemp .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kemp, L. (2019). Translational Research: Bridging the Chasm Between New Knowledge and Useful Knowledge. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_72

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics