Skip to main content

Thematic Analysis

Abstract

This chapter maps the terrain of thematic analysis (TA), a method for capturing patterns (“themes”) across qualitative datasets. We identify key concepts and different orientations and practices, illustrating why TA is often better understood as an umbrella term, used for sometimes quite different approaches, than a single qualitative analytic approach. Under the umbrella, three broad approaches can be identified: a “coding reliability” approach, a “codebook” approach, and a “reflexive” approach. These are often characterized by distinctive – sometimes radically different – conceptualizations of what a theme is, as well as methods for theme identification and development, and indeed coding. We then provide practical guidance on completing TA within our popular (reflexive) approach to TA, discussing each phase of the six-phase approach we have developed in relation to a project on men, rehabilitation, and embodiment. We conclude with a discussion of key concerns related to ensuring the TA you do – within whatever approach – is of the highest quality.

Keywords

  • Code
  • Codebook
  • Coding reliability
  • Epistemology
  • Latent
  • Reflexive thematic analysis
  • Semantic
  • Thematic map
  • Theme

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103
  • Chapter length: 18 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   729.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-981-10-5251-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1

References

  • Ando H, Cousins R, Young C. Achieving saturation in thematic analysis: development and refinement of a codebook. Compr Psychol. 2014;3:4.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson J. A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. Qual Rep. 1994;2(1):1–3. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/BackIssues/QR2-1/aronson.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H, editor. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Research designs, vol. 2. Washington, DC: APA books; 2012. p. 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: Sage; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun V, Clarke V. (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2016;19(6):739–43.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Braun V, Clarke V, Rance N. How to use thematic analysis with interview data. In: Vossler A, Moller N, editors. The counselling and psychotherapy research handbook. London: Sage; 2014. p. 183–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster ME, Velez BL, Mennicke A, Tebbe E. Voices from beyond: a thematic content analysis of transgender employees’ workplace experiences. Psychol Sex Orient Gend Divers. 2014;1(2): 159–69.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks J, McCluskey S, Turley E, King N. The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychological research. Qual Res Psychol. 2015;12(2):202–22.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cedervall Y, Åberg AC. Physical activity and implications on well-being in mild Alzheimer’s disease: a qualitative case study on two men with dementia and their spouses. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26(4):226–39.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly LM, Peltzer JN. Underdeveloped themes in qualitative research: relationships with interviews and analysis. Clin Nurse Spec. 2016;30:51–7.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dapkus MA. A thematic analysis of the experience of time. Personal Process Individ Differ. 1985;49(2):408–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSantis L, Ugarriza DN. The concept of theme as used in qualitative nursing research. West J Nurs Res. 2000;22(3):351–72.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay L, Gough B, editors. Reflexivity: a practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fugard AJB, Potts HWW. Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analysis: a quantitative tool. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2015;18(6):669–84.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gershgoren L, Basevitch I, Filho E, Gershgoren A, Brill YS, Shink RJ, Tenebaum G. Expertise in soccer teams: a thematic enquiry into the role of shared mental models within team chemistry. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2016;24:128–39.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gough B, Madill A. Subjectivity in psychological research: from problem to prospect. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(3):374–84.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2012.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qual Health Res. 2016;27(4):591–608.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hill M, Welch V, Gadda A. Contested views of expertise in children’s care and permanence proceedings. J Soc Welf Fam Law. 2017;39(1):42–66.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holton GJ. Thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe H. Thematic analysis. In: Harper D, Thompson AR, editors. Qualitative methods in mental health and psychotherapy: a guide for students and practitioners. Chichester: Wiley; 2011. p. 209–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kidder LH, Fine M. Qualitative and quantitative methods: when stories converge. In: Mark MM, Shotland L, editors. New directions in program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987. p. 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • King N. Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In: Cassell C, Symon G, editors. Essential guide to qualitative methods in organisational research. London: Sage; 2014. p. 256–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsky G, Strunk WO. Was Mendelssohn indebted to weber? An attempted solution of an old controversy. Music Q. 1933;19(2):178–86.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Langdridge D. Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology. Harlow: Pearson; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld PF, Merton RK. The psychological analysis of propaganda. In: Proceedings, Writers’ Congress: Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madill AL. Qualitative research is not a paradigm. Qual Psychol. 2015;2(2):214–20.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Malterud K, Siersma VK, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Manago AM. Negotiating a sexy masculinity on social networking sites. Fem Psychol. 2013;23(4):478–97.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McSherry W, Bloomfield S, Thompson R, Nixon VA, Birch C, Griffiths N, Fisher S, Boughey AJ. A cross-sectional analysis of the factors that shape adult nursing students’ values, attitudes and perceptions of compassionate care. J Res Nurs. 2017;22(1–2):25–39.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor R, Lovell A. The lived experience of UK street-based sex workers and the health consequences: an exploratory study. Health Promot Int. 2012;27(3):311–22.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran C, Lee C. Selling genital cosmetic surgery to healthy women: a multimodal discourse analysis of Australian surgical websites. Crit Discourse Stud. 2013;10(4):373–91.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nadin S, Cassell C. Using data matrices. In: Cassell C, Symon G, editors. Essential guide to qualitative methods in organisational research. London: Sage; 2014. p. 271–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namey E, Guest G, McKenna K, Chen M. Evaluating bang for the buck: a cost-effectiveness comparison between individual interviews and focus groups based on thematic saturation levels. Am J Eval. 2016;37(3):425–40.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Redmond L, Suddick K, Earhart GM. The lived experience of freezing in people with Parkinson’s: an interpretive phenomenological approach. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2012;19(3):169–77.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analysing qualitative data. London: Taylor & Francis; 1994. p. 173–94.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Roditis ML, Halpern-Felsher B. Adolescents’ perceptions of risks and benefits of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and marijuana: a qualitative analysis. J Adolesc Health. 2015;57:179–85.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski M, Leeman J. Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1404–13.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Firth J. Qualitative data approaches: the framework approach. Nurs Res. 2011;18(2): 52–62.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Terry D, Ali M, Lê Q. Asian migrants’ lived experience and acculturation to Western health care in rural Tasmania. Aust J Rural Health. 2011;19(6):318–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Terry G, Braun V. “I think gorilla-like back effusions of hair are rather a turn-off”: ‘excessive hair’ and male body hair (removal) discourse. Body Image. 2016;17:14–24.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Terry G, Hayfield N, Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. In: Willig C, Stainton Rogers W, editors. The sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2017. p. 17–37.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Titlestad A, Pooley JA. Resilience in same-sex-parented families: the lived experience of adults with gay, lesbian, or bisexual parents. J GLBT Fam Stud. 2014;10(4):329–53.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead S, Daiches A. Muslim views on mental health and psychotherapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2010;83(1):75–89.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Willig C. Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method. 3rd ed. Maidenhead, Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education (UK); 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winder AE, Hersko M. A thematic analysis of an outpatient psychotherapy group. Int J Group Psychother. 1958;8(3):293–300.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yardley L. Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology. In: Smith JA, editor. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2015. p. 257–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virginia Braun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Terry, G. (2019). Thematic Analysis. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103

Download citation