Advertisement

Future-Proofing Postgraduate Learning and Assessment Strategies for Deeper Learning

  • Chivonne Algeo
  • Darrall Thompson
  • Elyssebeth Leigh
  • Danny Carroll
Reference work entry
Part of the University Development and Administration book series (UDAA)

Abstract

In the twenty-first century, teachers in postgraduate education are, consciously or otherwise, attempting to prepare students to operate in “complex” contexts where outcomes are often unknown. The teaching role and task for academics is evolving from content provider and knowledge guardian into process designer and professional coach. Conversely, the learning role and task for students is emerging as one that requires engaging with personal “attributes” and developing capacities for knowledge integration as part of a lifelong learning strategy. To prepare graduates for a rapidly changing world and workplace, this chapter demonstrates future-proofed teaching and learning strategies together with attribute-based approaches to assessment using innovative software. The implementation of these in different postgraduate degrees at two Australian universities is used to demonstrate how these changing paradigms can be embraced by students, academics, and external accrediting bodies.

Keywords

Learning in action Postgraduate study Assessment strategies Knowledge transition 

References

  1. Argyris, Chris. 2008. Teaching smart people how to learn. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, Chris, and Donald A. Schön. 1996. Organisational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Assiter, Alison. 1995. Transferable skills in higher education. Teaching and learning in higher education series. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  4. Benjamin, Harold Raymond Wayne. 1939. Saber-tooth curriculum, including other lectures in the history of paleolithic education. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Business, Industry and Higher Education Collaboration Council. (2007). Graduate employability skills. Graduate Employability skills report. Download 8 Nov. 2017 from http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:19437
  6. Bonwell, Charles C., and Eison, James. 1991. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.Google Scholar
  7. Boud, David, and Nancy Falchikov. 2007. Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Boud, David, Ruth Cohen, and Jane Sampson. 2014. Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Brookfield, Stephen. 1998. Understanding and facilitating moral learning in adults. Journal of Moral Education 27 (3): 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, J.S., A. Collins, and S. Duguid. 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18 (1): 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll, Danny. 2015. Win, win, win: Future assessment systems. Accessed 24 May. https://www.academia.edu/14859674/Win_Win_Win_Future_Assessment_Systems.
  12. Carroll, Danny. 2016. Meaningfully embedding program (degree) learning goals in course work. Accessed 6 Apr. http://transformingassessment.com/events_6_april_2016.php.
  13. Dewey, John. 1938. Experience and education. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  14. Drew, Sue, Louise Thorpe, and Phil Bannister. 2002. Key skills computerised assessments: Guiding principles. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (2): 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster, G., (2013), Review: Academics Describe Marking Efficiency, NSW elearning video series, Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gc8Yk8kOmDY
  16. Great Schools Partnership. 2015. Glossary of education reform. Accessed 13 Apr. http://edglossary.org/curriculum/.
  17. Henry, R., S. Marshall, and P. Ramburuth. 2013. Improving assessment in higher education. Australia: New South Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hughes, C., and S. Barrie. 2008. Issues paper 5: Assessment – the explicit embedding of graduate attributes in assessment is essential for policy implementation. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Accessed 27 Apr. http://www.itl.usyd.edu.au/projects/nationalgap/resources/discussionpapers.htm
  19. Kambhammettu, V. 2014. Startups in the VUCA world. Accessed 14 May. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140721171726-44842835-startups-in-the-vuca-world.
  20. Kerr, Steven. 1975. On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal 18 (4): 769–783.Google Scholar
  21. Kinsinger, P., and K. Walch. 2015. Living and leading in a VUCA world. Accessed 14 May. http://www.thunderbird.edu/article/living-and-leading-vuca-world.
  22. Knight, Peter. 2007. Grading, classifying and future learning. In Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term, ed. David Boud and Nancy Falchikov, 72–86. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Kolb, David A. 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Mayer, K. 1992. Key competencies. In Report of the committee to advise the Australian Education Council and Ministers of Vocational Education, employment and training on employment-related key competencies for postcompulsory education and training; Editor Mayer, K. [Mayer Report]. Australia: AEC.Google Scholar
  25. Merriam-Webster. 2004. Merriam-webster’s collegiate dictionary. Merriam-Webster, Springfield. IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  26. Mezirow, Jack. 2006. An overview on transformative learning. In Lifelong learning: Concepts and contexts, ed. Jim Crowther and Peter Sutherland, 24–38. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Nonaka, Ikujiro, Ryoko Toyama, and Noboru Konno. 2000. SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, Elsevier Science Ltd 33 (1): 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oleson, Amanda, and Matthew T. Hora. 2014. Teaching the way they were taught? Revisiting the sources of teaching knowledge and the role of prior experience in shaping faculty teaching practices. Higher Education 68 (1): 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sadler, D. Royce. 2005. Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (2): 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Snowden, David. 2000. Cynefin: A sense of time and space, the social ecology of knowledge management. In In knowledge horizons: The present and the promise of knowledge management, ed. C. Despres and D. Chauvel, 237–265. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Snowden, David J., and Mary E. Boone. 2007. A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review 85 (11): 68–76.Google Scholar
  32. Thompson, Darrall. 2009. Successful engagement in graduate attribute assessment using software. Campus-Wide Information Systems 26 (5): 400–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thompson, Darrall. 2013. UTS graduate attribute integration guidelines. Sydney: University of Technology Sydney.Google Scholar
  34. University of New South Wales. 2012. Assessment policy.Google Scholar
  35. University of Technology Sydney. 2009a. Procedures for the assessment of coursework subjects. Sydney: University of Technolgy Sydney.Google Scholar
  36. University of Technology Sydney. 2009b. Policy for the assessment of coursework subjects. Sydney: University of Technology Sydney.Google Scholar
  37. Wright, P. 1996. What are graduates? Clarifying the attributes of graduateness. London: Higher Education Quality Council. Quality Enhancement Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chivonne Algeo
    • 3
  • Darrall Thompson
    • 2
  • Elyssebeth Leigh
    • 2
  • Danny Carroll
    • 1
  1. 1.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Design, Architecture and BuildingUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations