Advertisement

Identifying the Role and Managerial Leadership Competencies of Postgraduate Heads of Departments

Reference work entry
Part of the University Development and Administration book series (UDAA)

Abstract

The higher education sector has seen substantial changes in the past decades fueled by technology and political imperatives. This has provided a complex context for the delivery of postgraduate education. Among these changes has been the introduction of managerialism to the higher education sector. As research better understands consumer needs for and satisfaction in postgraduate education there is a focus on the role of professional academic manager which is redefining academic leadership across universities including the role of the head of department. This role has been considered by numerous authors in terms of role clarity and the particular balance between teaching, research, and management. Overwhelmingly there has been a recognition for increased managerial leadership competencies for incumbents in this role. Although some universities have developed their own specific managerial leadership competency framework, this has needed dedicated resources. The Competing Values Model (CVM) offers a robust model for consideration of both roles and managerial leadership competencies within the context of the organizational culture. This model was used to identify managerial leadership competencies at six higher educational institutions, predominantly postgraduate institutions, in Kerala, India. It is proposed that this model be used as the basis for both the identification and development of managerial leadership competencies in postgraduate heads of departments.

Keywords

Head of department role Managerialism Managerial leadership competencies Competing values model Postgraduate education Higher education institutions Kerala universities 

References

  1. Abraham, S. E., L. A. Karns, K. Shaw, and M. A. Mena. 2001. Managerial competencies and the managerial performance appraisal process. Journal of Management Development 20(10): 842–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, K., A. Zander, and G. Mullins. 2006. The professional expectations and experiences of Australian postgraduate research students in Engineering fields. Proceedings of the EDU-COM 2006 International Conference. Engagement and empowerment: New opportunities for growth in higher education, Edith Cowan University, Perth, 22–24 Nov 2006.Google Scholar
  3. Alam, F., Q. Alam, and G.R. Rasul. 2013. A pilot study on post graduate supervision. Procedia Engineering 56: 875–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angell, R.J., T.W. Heffernan, and P. Megicks. 2008. Service quality in postgraduate education. Quality Assurance in Education 16 (3): 236–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agut, R., S. Grau, and J. Peiró. 2003. Individual and contextual influences on managerial competency needs. The Journal of Management Development 22(10): 906–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barber, C.S., and B.C. Tietje. 2004. Competency requirements for managerial development in manufacturing, assembly, and/or material processing functions. Journal of Management Development 23 (6): 596–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartram, D. 2005. The great eight competencies: A criterion-centric approach to validation. Journal of Applied Psychology 90(6): 1185–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennis, W. 1991. Learning some basic truisms about leadership. National Forum 71(1): 12–15.Google Scholar
  9. Bolton, A. 2000. Managing the academic init. Milton Keynes: Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brill, J.L., K.K. Balcanoff, D. Land, M.M. Gogarty, and F. Turner. 2014. Best practices in doctoral retention: Mentoring. Higher Learning Research Communications 4 (2): 26–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v2i2.66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunetto, Y. 2001. Mediating change for public-sector professionals. International Journal of Public Sector Management 14 (6): 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bryman, A. 2007. Effective leadership in higher education: Summary of findings, Research and development series. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  13. Cameron, K., and R.E. Quinn. 2006. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chung Sea Law, D. 2010. Quality assurance in post-secondary education: The student experience. Quality Assurance in Education 18 (4): 250–270.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881011079125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crebert, G. 2000. Links between the purpose and outcomes of planning: Perceptions of heads of school at Griffith university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 22 (1): 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crosthwaite, C. 2010. Managerial leadership competencies of Heads of Departments: A case study of higher educational institutions in Kerala, India. Unpublished doctorate. University of Southern Queensland, Queensland.Google Scholar
  17. Crosthwaite, C., and R. Erwee. 2014. Managerial leadership competencies of Heads of Department in higher education institutions in Kerala, India. In 4th International conference on Engaged Management Scholarship in Tulsa. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2554024.
  18. Darling, J., and R. Nurmi. 2009. Key contemporary paradigms of management and leadership: A linguistic exploration and case for managerial leadership. European Business Review 21 (3): 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis, A. 2017. Managerialism and the risky business of quality assurance in universities. Quality Assurance in Education 25 (3): 317–328.  https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-06-2016-0027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deem, R. 2004. The knowledge worker, the manager-academic and the contemporary UK university: New and old forms of public management? Financial Accountability and Management 20 (2): 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DuBrin, A., and C. Dalglish. 2003. Leadership: An Australasian focus. Milton Keynes: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Duncan, A., and E. Harlacher. 1991. The twenty first century executive leader. Community College Review 18(4): 3948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Edgar, F., and A. Geare. 2010. Characteristics of high- and low-performing University Departments as assessed by the New Zealand Performance Based Research Funding (PBRF) exercise. Australian Accounting Review 20 (1): 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eggins, H. 2008. Trends and issues in postgraduate education: A global review. In Trends and issues in UNESCO postgraduate education: Challenges for research International Experts’ Workshop. Final Report. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0016/001607/160744e.pdf. Accessed on 8 August 2017
  25. English, F.W. 2005. A metadiscursive perspective on the landscape of educational leadership in the 21st Century. In The Sage handbook of educational leadership, ed. F.W. English, ix–xvi. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Erwee, R, L. Willcoxson, D. Smith, and C. Pederson. 2002. Constructing a leadership competencies development tool: A case study in a university. Paper presented to 16th Annual ANZAM Conference, Beechworth, 6 Dec.Google Scholar
  27. Floyd, A., and C. Dimmock. 2011. ‘Jugglers’, ‘copers’ and ‘strugglers’: Academics’ perceptions of being a head of department in a post-1992 UK university and how it influences their future careers. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 33 (4): 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gardner, S.K. 2009. Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing doctoral programs in the United States. High Education 58: 97–112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9184-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gayle, D.J., B. Tewarie, and A.Q. White. 2011. Governance in the twenty-first-century University: Approaches to effective leadership and strategic management: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Gmelch, W. H. 2004.The department chair’s balancing acts. New Directions for Higher Education 126: 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hammons, J., and L. Keller. 1990. Competencies and personal characteristics of future community college presidents. Community College Review 18(3): 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hammons, J.O., and J.W. Murry Jr. 1996. Management appraisal systems in community colleges: How good are they? Community College Review 24 (1): 19.  https://doi.org/10.1177/009155219602400103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hancock, N., and D. Hellawell. 2003. Academic middle management in higher education: A game of hide and seek? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 25 (1): 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hayes, J., A. Rose-Quirie, and C. Allinson. 2000. Senior managers’ perceptions of the competencies they require for effective performance: Implications for training and development. Personnel Review 29 (1): 92–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hellriegal, D., S. Jackson, and J. Slocum. 2005. Management: A competency based approach. Mason: South Western.Google Scholar
  36. Henkel, M. 2000. Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Hoppe, S. 2003. Identifying and nurturing potential academic leaders. New Directions for Higher Education 124: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jackson, M.P. 1999. The role of the head of department in managing performance in UK universities. The International Journal of Educational Management 13 (3): 142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kallenberg, T. 2007. Strategic innovation in HE: The roles of academic middle managers. Tertiary Education and Management 13 (1): 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kearney, M.L. 2008. The role of post-graduate education in research systems position paper. UNESCO/DCU Workshop on Trends in Post-Graduate Education, Dublin City University, 5–7 Mar 2008.Google Scholar
  41. Ladyshewsky, R.K., and R. Taplin. 2013. Factors influencing mode of study preferences in postgraduate business students. The International Journal of Management Education 11: 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Linden, J., M. Ohlin, and E.M. Brodin. 2013. Mentorship, supervision & learning experience in PhD education. Studies in Higher Education 38 (5): 639–662.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.596526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mercer, J. 2009. Junior academic-manager in higher education: An untold story? International Journal of Educational Management 23 (4): 348–359.Google Scholar
  44. Meyer, H.-D. 2002. The new managerialism in education management: Corporatisation or organisational learning? Journal of Educational Administration 40 (6): 534–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mok, K. 2003. Globalisation and higher education restructuring in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China. Higher Education Research and Development 22 (2): 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morris, T.L., and J.S. Laipple. 2015. How prepared are academic administrators? Leadership and job satisfaction within US research universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 37 (2): 241–251.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2015.1019125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Matheson, I. 2001. Culture change through applying competencies in development centres. Industrial and Commercial Training 33(4): 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. New, G. E. 1996. Reflections. Journal of Managerial Psychology 11(8) 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nguyen, TlH. 2012. Identifying the training needs of Heads of Department in a newly established university in Vietnam. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 34 (3): 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nickson, A. 2014. A qualitative case study exploring the nature of new managerialism in UK higher education and its impact on individual academics’ experience of doing research. Journal of Research Administration 45 (1): 47–80.Google Scholar
  51. Osseo-Asare, A., D. Longbottom, and P. Chourides. 2007. Managerial leadership for total quality improvement in UK higher education. The TQM Magazine 19 (6): 541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Potgieter, I.L., and M. Coetzee. 2010. Management competencies in higher education: Perceived job importance in relation to level of training required. SA Journal of Human Resource Management 8 (1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Preston, D., and D. Price. 2012. I see it as a phase: I don’t see it as the future’: Academics as managers in a United Kingdom university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 34 (4): 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Qualter, A., and I. Willis. 2012. Protecting academic freedom in changing times: The role of Heads of Departments. Journal of Educational Administration and History 44 (2): 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Quinn, R. E., and G. Spreitzer. 1997. The road to empowerment: seven questions every leader should consider. Organisational Dynamics 26(2): 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Quinn, R.E. 1988. Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  57. Quinn, R.E., and G. Spreitzer. 1991. The psychometrics of the competing values culture instrument. Research in Organisational Change and Development 5: 115–142.Google Scholar
  58. Quinn, R.E., S. Faerman, M. Thompson, and M. McGrath. 2003. Becoming a master manager. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  59. Quinn, R. E., S. Faerman, M. Thompson, and M. Mc Grath. 2015. Becoming a master manager. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Rausch, E., H. Sherman, and J. B. Washbush. 2002. Defining and assessing competencies for competency-based, outcome-focused management development, Journal of Management Development 21(3): 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rindfleish, J. 2003. Segment profiling: Reducing strategic risk in higher education management. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 25 (2): 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Santiago, R., T. Carvalho, A. Amara, and V.L. Meek. 2006. Changing patterns in the middle management of higher education institutions: The case of Portugal. Higher Education 52: 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scholtes, P. R. 2009. The new competencies of leadership, Total Quality Management 10(4–5): 704–710.Google Scholar
  64. Sherman, R., J. Tibbetts, D. Dobbins, and D. Weidler. 2001. Management competencies and sample indicators for the improvement of adult education programs. Washington, DC: Pelavin Research Institute.Google Scholar
  65. Spendlove, M. 2007. Competencies for effective leadership in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management 21 (5): 410–417.Google Scholar
  66. Stratford, E. 2012. A genuine career or impossible heroism? Experiencing the role of the Head of School: An Australian case study. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 34 (3): 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stuart, R., and P. Lindsay. 1997. Beyond the frame of management competenc(i)es: Towards a contextually embedded framework of managerial competence in organisations. Journal of European Industrial Training 21 (1): 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Teelken, C. 2012. Compliance or pragmatism: How do academics deal with managerialism in higher education? A comparative study in three countries. Studies in Higher Education 37 (3): 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Temple, J., and J. Ylitalo. 2009. Promoting inclusive (and dialogic) leadership in higher education institutions. Tertiary Education and Management 15 (3): 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Terrion, J.L. 2006. The impact of a management training program for university administrators. Journal of Management Development 25 (2): 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thomas, J., and P. Sireno. 1980. Assessing management competency needs. Training & Development Journal 34 (9): 47–51.Google Scholar
  72. Thompson, J., and J. Harrison. 2002. Competent managers? – The development and validation of a normative model using the MCI standards. Journal of Management Development 19 (10): 836–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Townsend, B. K., and S. Bassoppo-Moyo. 1997. The effective community college academic administrator: necessary competencies and attitudes. Community College Review 25(2): 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge. 2008. Trends and Issues in postgraduate education: Challenges for research. International Experts’ Workshop Final Report.Google Scholar
  75. Vilkinas, T., and G. Cartan. 2015. Navigating the turbulent waters of academia: The leadership role of programme managers. Tertiary Education and Management 21 (4): 306–315.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2015.1082189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weinberg, A.M., and G. Graham-Smith. 2012. Collegiality: Can it survive the corporate university? Social Dynamics: A Journal of African Studies 38 (1): 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Winter, R. 2009. Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31 (2): 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Winter, R., and J. Sarros. 2002. Corporate reforms to Australian universities: Views from the academic heartland. Journal of Institutional Research 11 (2): 92–104.Google Scholar
  79. Wolverton, M., R. Ackerman, and S. Holt. 2005. Preparing for leadership: What academic department chairs need to know? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 (2): 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yu, T., and N. Wu. 2009. A review of study on the competing values framework. International Journal of Business and Management 4 (7): 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yukl, G., and R. Lepsinger. 2005. Why integrating the leading and managing roles is essential for organisational effectiveness. Organisational Dynamics 34 (4): 361–375. X13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zenger, J., and J. Folkman. 2003. The extraordinary leader: Turning good managers into great leaders. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Institute of Management Business School and College of BusinessVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations