Advertisement

The Doctoral Studies Paradox: Indigenous Cultural Paradigms Versus Western-Based Research Practices

  • Fernando F. Padró
Reference work entry
Part of the University Development and Administration book series (UDAA)

Abstract

This is an exploratory conceptual chapter regarding the ontological and epistemological premises that are present in the enrollment of Indigenous peoples in doctoral programs at higher education institutions (HEIs). The paradoxical nature of navigating through distinct points-of-view about two distinct cultural perspectives, that of the doctorate representing a culminating recognition of a professional culture based on Western tradition and the norms and values of Indigenous cultures. There are personal risks involved in undergoing an education predicated on conflicting messages paradoxes represent from prior personal and collective experience and from institutional dicta and expectations. This chapter looks at how an individual brings these elements together in a transformative manner that accepts or rejects governmental preference for enhanced participation by Indigenous peoples in doctoral education programs.

Keywords

Hybridity Indigenous doctoral students Paradox Risk 

References

  1. Allais, M. 1953. Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel Devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’Ecole Americaine. Econometrica 21 (4): 503–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyris, C. 1996. On organizational learning. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Arrow, K. 1963. Social choice and individual values 2e. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Behrendt, L., S. Larkin, R. Griew, and P. Kelly. 2012. Review of higher education access and outcomes for aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Canberra: Department of Education & Training.Google Scholar
  5. Bhabha, H.K. 1994. The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bradley, D., et al. 2008. Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  7. Bruner, J. 1990. Acts of meaning. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Castellano, M.B. 2004. Ethics of aboriginal research. Journal of Aboriginal Health 1 (1): 98.Google Scholar
  9. Cross, S.L., et al. 2009. Task force on native Americans in social work education final report: Status of native Americans in social work higher education. Alexandria: Council on Social Work Education. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=55342.
  10. Foucault, M. 2005/1982. The hermeneutics of the subject: Lectures at the college de France 1981–1982. Trans. Ed. F. Gros and G. Burchell. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  11. Friedman, M., and L.J. Savage. 1948. The utility analysis of choices involving risk. The Journal of Political Economy 56 (4): 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grant, B., and E. McKinley. 2011. Colouring the pedagogy of doctoral supervision: Considering supervisor, student and knowledge through the lens of indigeneity. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 48 (4): 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green, B. 2009. Addressing the curriculum problem in doctoral education. Australian Universities Review 54 (1): 10–18.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, S. 1996. Who needs identity. In Questions of cultural identity, ed. S. Hall and P. du Gay. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Hargreaves, A., and M. Fullan. 2012. Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school, 81. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hawley, P. 2010. Being bright is not enough: The unwritten rules of doctoral study. 3rd ed. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  17. Heidegger, M. 2008/1927. Being and time. Trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  18. Henry, J. 2007. Supervising aboriginal doctoral candidates. In Supervising doctorates downunder: Keys to effective supervision in, ed. C. Denholm and T. Evans. Camberwell: ACER Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hershey, J.L.2007. The lived experience of becoming a professional nurse for associate degree nursing graduates: A phenomenological study. Doctoral dissertation. State College: The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  20. Kahneman, D. 2003. A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist 58 (9): 697–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (2): 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kahneman, D., P.P. Wakker, and R. Sarin. 1997. Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2): 375–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Knight, F.H. 1964/1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit, 206. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  24. Lahenius, K., and M. Martinuso. 2011. Different types of doctoral study processes. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 55 (6): 609–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larkin, S., et al. 2010. Submission to consultation paper: Meeting Australia’s research workforce needs – A consultation paper to inform the development of the Australian Government’s research workforce strategy from the indigenous higher education advisory council. Canberra: Department of Innovation, Industry Science and Research.Google Scholar
  26. Larkin, S., et al. 2011. National indigenous higher education workforce strategy. Canberra: The Indigenous Higher Education Advisory Council (IHEAC).Google Scholar
  27. Lee, A., and B. Green. 2009. Supervision as metaphor. Studies in Higher Education 34 (6): 615–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lefebvre, H. 1991/1974. The production of space. Trans. D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Lewis, M.H., and G.E. Dehler. 2000. Learning through paradox: A pedagogical strategy for exploring contradictions and complexity. Journal of Management Education 24 (6): 710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lusted, D. 1986. Why pedagogy? Screen 27 (5): 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Manathunga, C. 2015. Intercultural doctoral supervision: The centrality of place, time and other forms of knowledge. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education 0 (0): 1–12.Google Scholar
  32. McCormack, C. 2004. Tensions between student and institutional conceptions of postgraduate research. Studies in Higher Education 29 (3): 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McKinley, E., B. Grant, S. Middleton, K. Irwin, and L.R.T. Williams. 2011. Working at the Interface: Indigenous students’ experience of undertaking doctoral studies in Aotearoa New Zealand. Equity and Excellence in Education 44 (1): 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pearson, M. 1999. The changing environment for doctoral education in Australia: Implications for quality management, improvement and innovation. Higher Education Research and Development 18 (3): 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pechenkina, E., E. Kowal, and Y. Parides. 2011. Indigenous Australian students’ participation rates in higher education: Exploring the role of universities. Indigenous Education 40: 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pidgeon, M., and D.G. Hardy Cox. 2002. Researching with aboriginal peoples: Practices and principles. Canadian Journal of Native Education 26 (2): 96.Google Scholar
  37. Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Polanyi, M. 1965. The structure of consciousness. Brain 88: 799–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Polanyi, M. 1966. The tacit dimension. Garden City: Doubleday & Company.Google Scholar
  40. Pyhältö, K., A. Toom, J. Stubb, and K. Lonka. 2012. Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of doctoral students of becoming a scholar. ISRN Education 2012:1–12. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/934941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ryle, G. 2009/1949. The concept of mind. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Schein, E.H. 1985. Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  43. Schofield, T., R. O’Brien, and J. Gilroy. 2013. Indigenous higher education: Overcoming barriers to participation in research higher degree programs. Australian Aboriginal Studies 2: 13–28.Google Scholar
  44. Snow, C.P. 1998/1959. The two cultures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Trudget, M., S. Page, and N. Harrison. 2016. Brilliant minds: A snapshot of successful indigenous Australian doctoral students. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education 45 (1): 70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trudgett, M. 2011. Western places, academic spaces and indigenous faces: Supervising indigenous Australian postgraduate students. Teaching in Higher Education 16 (4): 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Trudgett, M. 2014. Supervision provided to indigenous Australian doctoral students: A black and white issue. Higher Education Research and Development 33 (5): 1035–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1986. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business 59 (4): S251–S278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wagner, R.K., and R.J. Sternberg. 1985. Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology 49 (2): 436–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weick, K.E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Wergin, J.F., and L. Alexandre. 2016. Differentiation and integration: Managing the paradox in doctoral education. In Emerging directions in doctoral education, ed. P. Blessinger and D. Stockley, 225–242, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  53. Wisker, G., and G. Robinson. 2014. Examiner practices and culturally inflected doctoral theses. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 35 (2): 190–205.Google Scholar
  54. Zeelenberg, M., J. Beattie, J. van der Pligt, and N.K. de Vries. 1996. Consequences of regret aversion: Effects of expected feedback on risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 65 (2): 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang, Z. What is lived space? Ephemera 6 (2): 219–223.Google Scholar
  56. Zhao, C.-M., C.M. Golde, and A.C. McCormick. 2007. More than a signature: How advisor choice and advisor behaviour affect doctoral student satisfaction. Journal of Further and Higher Education 31 (3): 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Open Access CollegeUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia

Personalised recommendations