Advertisement

Heutagogy in Postgraduate Education: Cognitive Advantages for Higher Degree Online Students

  • Sue Gregory
  • Michelle Bannister-Tyrrell
  • Jennifer Charteris
  • Adele Nye
Reference work entry
Part of the University Development and Administration book series (UDAA)

Abstract

As the nature of postgraduate education changes with the inclusion of diverse groups of students who may live at a distance (sometimes in remote areas) and new and emerging technological affordances, shifts are signaled in relationships with peers, teaching staff, and higher education organizations. Heutagogy, as a self-directed approach to learning, supports higher-level cognitive function, double-loop learning, and a shift from educator centered to learner initiated and driven learning. Provided is an account of heutagogy in the form of three case studies that illustrate heutagogy in the teaching, learning, and supervision of online postgraduate education students through a variety of traditional, immersive, and engaging emerging online tools. By discussing the use of both traditional and emerging innovative ICT tools, provided is an overview of how postgraduate students can demonstrate heutagogical approaches to learning, offering readers ideas and alternatives to use in their profession as online educators.

Keywords

Heutagogy Andragogy Postgraduate student Distance education Online learning Technologies 

References

  1. Anderson, Terry. 2010. Theories for learning with emerging technologies. In Emerging technologies in distance education, ed. George Velestsianos. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Angelino, L.M., F.K. Williams, and D. Natvig. 2007. Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. Journal of Educators Online 4 (2): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, Albert. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Vol. ix. New York: W H Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
  4. Bannister-Tyrrell, Michelle, Susan Smith, Peter Merrotsy, and Linley Cornish. 2014. Taming a ‘many-headed monster’: Tarricone’s taxonomy of metacognition. TalentEd 28 (1/2): 1–12.Google Scholar
  5. Blaschke, L.M. 2012. Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of Heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 13 (1): 56.Google Scholar
  6. Blaschke, L.M. 2014. Using social media to engage and develop the online learner in self-determined learning. Research in Learning Technology 22: 21635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cochrane, Thomas, Laurent Antonczak, Averill Gordon, Helen Sissons, and Andrew Withell. 2012. Heutagogy and mobile social media: Post web 2.0 pedagogy. In Proceedings Ascilite wellington 2012: Future challenges, sustainable futures, ed. Brown Mark, M. Hartnett, and Sarah Stewart, 204–214. Wellington: Massey University and ascilite.Google Scholar
  8. Collins English Dictionary, 5th Edition. 2016. “Agogy definition.” Revers – HarperCollins Publishers 5th Edition. http://dictionary.reverso.net/english-definition/agogy.
  9. Dirkx, J., and J. Mezirow. 2006. Musings and reflections on the meaning, context and process of transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Learning 4 (2): 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Downes, Stephen. 2010. New technology supporting informal learning. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence 2 (1): 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Facebook, Inc. 2016. “Facebook reports fourth quarter and full year 2015 results.” Investor Relations. 27 Jan. https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2016/Facebook-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2015-Results/default.aspx.
  12. Gale, Trevor, and Stephen Parker. 2014. Navigating change: A typology of student transition in higher education – DRO. Studies in Higher Education 39 (5): 734–753.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.721351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garrison, D.R. 2007. Online Community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. [Report]. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11 (1): 61–72.Google Scholar
  14. Goodband, John Hallam, Yvette Solomon, Peter Charles Samuels, Duncan Lawson, and Roy Bhakta. 2012. Limits and potentials of social networking in academia: Case study of the evolution of a mathematics Facebook Community. Learning, Media and Technology 37 (3): 236–252.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2011.587435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gregory, Sue, and Belinda Tynan, B. 2009. Introducing Jass Easterman: My Second Life learning space. In R. Atkinson & A. McBeath (Eds.), Same Places, Different Spaces. Proceedings ascilite Auckland 2009 (pp. 377–386). Auckland, New Zealand: The University of Auckland, Auckland University of Technology, and ascilite. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland09/procs/gregory.pdf.
  16. Hase, Stewart, and Chris Kenyon. 2001. From andragogy to heutagogy. http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/pr/Heutagogy.html.
  17. Hase, Stewart, and Chris Kenyon. 2007. Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory. International Journal of Complexity and Education 4 (1): 111–118.Google Scholar
  18. Hou, Huei-Tse, Shu-Ming Wang, Peng-Chun Lin, and Kuo-En Chang. 2015. Exploring the Learner’s knowledge construction and cognitive patterns of different asynchronous platforms: Comparison of an online discussion forum and Facebook. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52 (6): 610–620.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.847381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jakobsdottir, Solveig, Lindy McKeown, and Debra Hoven. 2010. Using the new information and communication Technologies for the Continuing Professional Development of teachers through open and distance learning. In Teacher education through open and distance learning, ed. Patrick Alan Danaher and Abdurrahman Umar, 105–120. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning. http://www.col.org/resources/publications/Pages/detail.aspx?PID=332#.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, R. Burke, and Larry B. Christensen. 2010. Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Kanuka, Heather, and K. Jugdev. 2006. Distance education MBA students: An investigation into the use of an orientation course to address academic and social integration issues. Open Learning 21 (2): 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knowles, Malcolm. 1970. The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. New York: Cambridge: The Adult Education Company. http://www.umsl.edu/~henschkej/articles/a_The_%20Modern_Practice_of_Adult_Education.pdf.
  23. Knowles, M. 1975. Self-directed learning: A guide for teachers and learners. Chicago, IL: Follett.Google Scholar
  24. Magogwe, Joel M., Beauty Ntereke, and Keith R. Phetlhe. 2015. Facebook and classroom group work: A trial study involving university of Botswana advanced oral presentation students. British Journal of Educational Technology 46 (6): 1312–1323.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McAuliffe, Marisha B., Douglas J. Hargreaves, Abigail J. Winter, and Gary Chadwick. 2008. Does pedagogy still rule? In Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education: To industry and beyond, 367–372. Yeppoon: Central Queensland University/Australasian Association for Engineer Education. http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=314972727762633;res=IELENG.
  26. McWhorter, Rochell, and A. Julia Delello. 2015. Green computing through virtual learning environments: Educational IS&T Book Chapter | IGI Global. In Handbook of research on innovative technology integration in higher education, ed. Frederick Muyia Nafukho and J. Beverly Irby, vol. 28. Hershey: IGI Global: Disseminator of Knowledge.  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8170-5.ch001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Merriam, Sharan B. 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Parks, Malcolm R. 2011. “Social network sites as virtual communities.” In A Networked Self: Identify, community, and culture on social network sites, Zizi Papacharissi, 105–123. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. http://viralmedia.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/45052678/A%20Networked%20Self-Identity,%20Community%20and%20Culture%20on%20Social%20Network%20Sites%202011.pdf.
  29. Schunk, Dale H., and Barry J. Zimmerman. 2007. Influencing children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading & Writing Quarterly 23 (1): 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, Louis M. 1978. An evolving logic of participant observation, educational ethnography, and other case studies. Review of Research in Education 6: 316–377.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1167249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Somerville, M. 2007. Postmodern emergence. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 20 (2): 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Somerville, Margaret J. 2008. ‘Waiting in the chaotic place of unknowing’: Articulating postmodern emergence. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 21 (3): 209–220.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390801998353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stake, Robert E. 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  34. Synnott, Michael. 2013. Reflection and double loop learning the case of HS2. Teaching Public Administration 31 (1): 124–134.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739413479950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tarricone, Pina. 2011. The taxonomy of metacognition. Hove: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis Group. https://works.bepress.com/pina_tarricone/11/.
  36. Teichler, Ulrich. 1998. Massification: A challenge for institutions of higher education. Tertiary Education and Management 4 (1): 17–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02679393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. University of New England. 2016. Home. Accessed 14 June. http://www.une.edu.au/home.
  38. VanDoorn, George, and Antoinette A. Eklund. 2013. Face to Facebook: Social media and the learning and teaching potential of symmetrical, Sychronous communication. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 10 (1/6): 1–14.Google Scholar
  39. Wenger-Trayner, Etienne, and B. Wenger-Trayner. 2015. Communities of practice and social learning systems. http://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/.
  40. Whittaker, Alexandra L., Gordon S. Howarth, and Kerry A. Lymn. 2014. Evaluation of Facebook© to create an online learning Community in an Undergraduate Animal Science Class. Educational Media International 51 (2): 135–145.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2014.924664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wiegand, Greg, ed. 2009. Cloud computing: Web-based applications that change the way you work and collaborate online. Que Publishing. http://ptgmedia.pearsoncmg.com/images/9780789738035/samplepages/0789738031_Sample.pdf.
  42. Yang, Haibo, and Mary Tate. 2012. A descriptive literature review and classification of cloud computing research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 31 (1): 35. http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol31/iss1/2.
  43. Yilmaz, Fatma Gizem, and Hafize Keser. 2016. The impact of reflective thinking activities in E-learning: A critical review of the empirical research. Computers & Education 95: 163–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zimmerman, Barry J. 1995. Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist 30 (4): 217–221.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3004_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sue Gregory
    • 1
  • Michelle Bannister-Tyrrell
    • 1
  • Jennifer Charteris
    • 1
  • Adele Nye
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations