Developing Mixed Methods Research Skills: Becoming Methodologically Trilingual

  • Roslyn Cameron
Reference work entry
Part of the University Development and Administration book series (UDAA)


The aim of this chapter is fourfold. Firstly, mixed methods research is described and situated as the third methodological movement. Secondly trends in the utilization of MMR across disciplines is presented before an exploration of the key issues in relation to the teaching of mixed methods research to postgraduate research students unfolds. Lastly, a core curriculum for postgraduate MMR courses and professional development activities for masters and doctoral supervisory staff is proposed.


Mixed methods research Teaching postgradaute research skills Methodologically trilingual 


  1. Baran, M. 2010. Teaching multi-methodology research courses to doctoral students. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 4 (1): 19–27. Scholar
  2. Bazeley, P. 2003. Teaching mixed methods. Qualitative Research Journal 3: 117–126.Google Scholar
  3. Cameron, R. 2010a. Mixed methods in VET research: Usage and quality. International Journal of Training Research 8: 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron, R. 2010b. Is mixed methods used in Australian career development research. Australian Journal of Career Development 19: 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron, R. 2011a. Mixed methods in business and management: A call to the ‘first generation’. Journal of Management & Organisation 17 (2): 264. ISSN: 1833367213243209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cameron, R. 2011b. Mixed methods research: The five Ps framework. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 9 (2): 96–108. ISSN: 1477–7029.Google Scholar
  7. Cameron, R. 2015. Chapter 8. The emerging use of mixed methods in educational research. In Meanings and motivation in educational research, ed. M. Baguley, Y. Findlay, and M. Kerby, 103–115. Oxon: Routledge. ISBN: 978-1-138-81027-3.Google Scholar
  8. Cameron, R., S. Sankaran, and G. Scales. 2015. Mixed methods use in project management research. Project Management Journal 46 (2): 90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christ, T.W. 2010. Chapter 25. Teaching mixed methods and action research: Pedagogical, practical and evaluative considerations. In Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, ed. A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 643–666. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins, K.M.T. 2010. Introduction: Crafting significant learning experiences in the context of teaching mixed methodologies. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 4 (1): 6–8. Scholar
  11. Gibson, C.B. 2016. Elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation: On enhancing the value of mixed method research. Organizational Research Methods 20: 1–31. Scholar
  12. Greene, J., and V. Caracelli, eds. 1997. Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Greene, J., and V. Caracelli. 2003. Making paradigmatic sense of mixed methods inquiry. In Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, ed. A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Grimmer, M., and D. Hanson. 2009. Qualitative and quantitative research published in the International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1998–2007. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM), Melbourne.Google Scholar
  15. Hanson, D., and M. Grimmer. 2007. The mix of qualitative and quantitative research in major marketing journals, 1993–2002. European Journal of Marketing 41: 58–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harrison, R.L., III. 2013. Using mixed methods designs in the Journal of Business Research, 1990–2010. Journal of Business Research 66 (11): 2153–2162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison, R.L., and T.M. Reilly. 2011. Mixed methods designs in marketing research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 14 (1): 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hart, L., S. Smith, S. Swars, and M. Smith. 2009. An examination of research methods in mathematics education (1995–2005). Journal of Mixed Methods Research 3: 26–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hurmerinta-Peltomaki, L., and N. Nummela. 2006. Mixed methods in international business research: A value-added perspective. Management International Review 46 (4): 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hutchinson, S.R., and C.D. Lovell. 2004. A review of methodological characteristics of research published in key journals in higher education: Implications for graduate research teaching. Research in Higher Education 45: 383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ivankova, N. 2010. Teaching and learning mixed methods research in computer-mediated environment: Educational gains and challenges. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 4 (1): 49–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson, R.B., and A.J. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researchers 33 (7): 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, R.B., A.J. Onwuegbuzie, and L.A. Turner. 2007. Towards a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (2): 112–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leech, N.L., and Onwuegbuzie, A.J. 2010. Epilogue: The journey: From where we started to where we hope to go. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 4 (1): 73–88. Scholar
  25. Maxcy, S. 2003. Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, ed. A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Mertens, D.M. 2010. Philosophy in mixed methods teaching: The transformative paradigm as illustration. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 4 (1): 9–18. Scholar
  27. Miller, P., and R. Cameron. 2011. Mixed method research designs: A case study of their adoption in a doctor of business administration program. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 5: 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Molina-Azorin, J.F. 2008. Mixed methods research in business management: A comparison of the use of mixed methods in three specific areas. Paper presented at the IV Mixed Methods Conference, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  29. Molina-Azorin, J.F. 2011. The use and added value of mixed methods in management research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 5: 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Molina-Azorin, J.F. 2012. Mixed methods research in strategic management: Impact and applications. Organizational Research Methods 15: 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Molina-Azorín, J.F., and R. Cameron. 2010. The application of mixed methods in organisational research: A literature review. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 8: 95–105.Google Scholar
  32. Molina-Azorin, J., and R. Cameron. 2015. Chapter 26. History and emergent practices of multimethods and mixed methods in business research. In The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry, ed. Sharlene Hesse-Biber and Burke Johnson, 466–485. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Molina-Azorin, J.F., M.D. López-Gamero, J. Pereira-Moliner, and E. Pertusa-Ortega. 2012. Mixed methods studies in entrepreneurship research: Applications and contributions. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 24: 425–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Niglas, K. 2009. How the novice researcher can make sense of mixed methods designs. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 3 (1): 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Plowright, D. 2013. To what extent do postgraduate students understand the principles of mixed methods in educational research? International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 7 (1): 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Powell, H., S. Mihalas, A. Onwuegbuzie, S. Suldo, and C. Daley. 2008. Mixed methods in school psychology: A mixed methods investigation of trends in the literature. Psychology in the Schools 45 (4): 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Robinson, P. 2010. CONCLUSION: On hammers, nails and building sites – Teaching mixed methods. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 4 (1): 66–72. Scholar
  38. Stentz, J.E., V.L. Plano Clark, and G.S. Matkin. 2012. Applying mixed methods to leadership research: A review of current practices. The Leadership Quarterly 23 (6): 1173–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie, eds. 2003. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Teddlie, C., and A. Tashakkori. 2010. Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, ed. A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 1–41. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Truscott, D., S. Swars, S. Smith, F. Thornton-Reid, Y. Zhao, and C. Dooley. 2010. A cross-disciplinary examination of the prevalence of mixed methods in educational research: 1995–2005. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 12 (4): 1–12.Google Scholar
  42. Venkatesh, V., S. Brown, and H. Bala. 2013. Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly 37: 21–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Institute of BusinessAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations