Advertisement

The Doctor of Business Administration: Managing Candidate Diversity and the Academy

  • Michelle Wallace
  • Teresa Marchant
Reference work entry
Part of the University Development and Administration book series (UDAA)

Abstract

Professional doctorate programs have been offered through Australian universities since the mid-1990s, and the Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) has been at the forefront of offerings. The chapter provides a snapshot of contemporary DBA programs in Australia and explores the diversity of DBA candidates and their needs. The authors explore issues regarding the expectations of academic managers, candidates, and supervisors of DBA programs, current positive and negative outcomes of DBA programs from both management and candidate perspectives, the structure of DBA programs, and the gap between coursework and thesis. Practical suggestions are made to manage the status of the DBA in the academy, enhance the structure of the DBA programs, and better manage the enculturation of candidates into the academic genre, given the applied nature of a DBA program. This chapter is informed by contemporary literature on doctoral candidature and two recent empirical studies; one is a qualitative study on the DBA co-led by the first author and funded by the Australian government’s Office of Learning and Teaching, and the other is an analysis of Australian government statistics on DBA numbers and completions 1993–2013.

Keywords

DBA Academic managers Candidates Diversity Supervisors Course structure Better practice 

References

  1. Access Economics. 2010. Australia’s future research workforce supply, demand and influence factors. Canberra: Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research.Google Scholar
  2. Aitchison, C., B. Kamler, and A. Lee, eds. 2010. Publishing pedagogies for the Doctorate and beyond. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, S., J. Allinson, and J. Hayes. 2004. The effects of cognitive style on research supervision: A study of student-supervisor dyads in management education. Academy of Management Learning and Education 3: 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Qualifications Framework Council. 2013. Australian qualifications framework. Adelaide: Australian Qualifications Framework Council.Google Scholar
  5. Bareham, J., T. Bourner, and G. Ruggeri-Stevens. 2000. The DBA: What is it for? Career Development International 5 (7): 394–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourke, S., A. Holbrook, T. Lovat, and K. Dally. 2004. Characteristics, degree completion times and thesis quality of Australian PHD candidates. Callaghan: University of Newcastle.Google Scholar
  7. Bourner, T., R. Bowden, and S. Laing. 2001. Professional doctorates in England. Studies in Higher Education 26 (1): 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carr, S., M. Lhussier, and C. Chandler. 2010. The supervision of professional doctorates: Experiences of the process and ways forward. Nurse Education Today 30: 279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dabbagh, N., Benson, A.D., Denham, A., Joseph, R., Al-Freih, M., Zgheib, G., Fake, H. and Zhetao, G. 2016. Learning Technologies and Globalization: Pedagogical Frameworks and Applications. Springer: New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellis, A., and A. Anderson. 2009. A snapshot of Australian professional doctorates. In Professional doctorate research in Australia: Commentary and case studies from business, education and indigenous studies, ed. P. Miller and T. Marchant, 7–14. Lismore: SCU Press.Google Scholar
  11. Erwee, R. 2004. Professional doctorates and DBAs in Australia: Dilemmas and opportunities to innovate. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour 7: 394–400.Google Scholar
  12. Evans, T., P. Macauley, M. Pearson, and K. Tregenza. 2005. Why do a ‘prof doc’ when you can do a PhD? In Professional Doctorates 5: Revised papers from the fifth Professional Doctorates Conference: Working doctorates: The impact of professional doctorates in the workplace and professions, ed. T.W. Maxwell, C. Hickey, and T. Evans, 24–34. Geelong: Research Institute for Professional and Vocational Education and Training.Google Scholar
  13. Fenge, L. 2009. Professional doctorates – a better route for researching professionals? Social Work Education 28 (2): 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fergie, G., S. Beeke, C. McKenna, and P. Crème. 2011. ‘It’s a lonely walk’: Supporting postgraduate researchers through writing. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 23 (2): 236–245.Google Scholar
  15. Galvin, P. 2004. Success with off-shore DBAs: Experiences from Hong Kong and Thailand. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour 7 (7): 431–439.Google Scholar
  16. Golde, C.M., and T.M. Dore. 2001. At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.Google Scholar
  17. Group of Eight. 2013. The changing PhD: Discussion paper. The Group of Eight: Turner, ACT.Google Scholar
  18. Hay, G.W. 2004. Executive PhDs as a solution to the perceived relevance gap between theory and practice: A framework of theory-practice linkages for the study of the executive doctoral scholar-practitioner. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour 7 (1): 375–393.Google Scholar
  19. Kiley, M. 2009. ‘You don’t want a smart Alec’: Selecting examiners to assess doctoral dissertations. Studies in Higher Education 34 (8): 889–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kiley, M. 2011. Developments in research supervisor training: Causes and responses. Studies in Higher Education 36 (5): 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kiley, M., and K. Bell. 2014. Report of state-based workshops: Coursework in Australian doctoral education: What’s happening, why and future directions? Sydney: Office of Learning and Teaching.Google Scholar
  22. Kortt, M., S.J. Pervan, and O. Hogan. 2016. The rise and fall of the Australian DBA. Education + Training 58 (4): 390–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, A. 2008. How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education 33: 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lovitts, B. E. 2001. Leaving the Ivory Tower: The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study. Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham, Maryland, United States.Google Scholar
  25. Lovitts, B. 2006. Being a good course-taker is not enough: A theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research. Studies in Higher Education 30: 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mahmud, S., M. Wallace, G. Sanderson, P. Hukam Singh, C. Briguglio, T. Thuraisingam, and S. Yeo. 2010. In Collaborative approaches to moderation of assessment in transnational education, AIEC Conference, October 2010.Google Scholar
  27. Manathunga, C. 2009. Supervision as a contested space: A response. Teaching in Higher Education 14 (3): 341–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Manathunga, C., C. Smith, and D. Bath. 2004. Developing and evaluating authentic integration between research and coursework in professional doctorate programs. Teaching in Higher Education 9: 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manathunga, C. 2005. The development of research supervision: ‘turning the light on a private space’. International Journal for Academic Development 10(1): 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Manathunga, C., R. Pitt, L. Cox, P. Boreham, G. Mellick, and P. Lant. 2012. Evaluating industry-based doctoral research programs: Perspectives and outcomes of Australian Cooperative Research Centre graduates. Studies in Higher 37 (7): 843–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marchant, T. 2012. The implications of globalisation for the management and business research environment. In Transnational doctoral education and research: An Asian focus, ed. P. Miller, A. Selvanathan, and G. Meredith, 209–226. Lismore: SCU Press.Google Scholar
  32. Marchant, T., and M. Wallace. 2013. Sixteen years of change for Australian female academics: Progress or segmentation? Australian Universities Review 55 (2): 60–71.Google Scholar
  33. Marchant, T., N. Anastasi, and P. Miller. 2011. Reflections on academic writing and publication for doctoral students and supervisors: Reconciling authorial voice and performativity. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour 16 (1): 13–29.Google Scholar
  34. Marginson, S. 2015. International education in Australia: Riding the roller coaster. International Higher Education 68: 11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCarthy, G. 2012. The case for coaching as an approach to addressing challenges in doctoral supervision. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour 17: 15–27.Google Scholar
  36. Meredith, G. 1998. Global DBA delivery via the internet. In Proceedings of Professional doctorates: Innovations in teaching and research – proceedings of the professional doctorate conference, eds. T. Maxwell & P. Shanahan. Coffs Harbour.Google Scholar
  37. Meredith, G. 2012. Publishing research outcomes. In Transnational doctoral education and research: An Asian focus, ed. P. Miller, A. Selvanathan, and G. Meredith, 291–302. Lismore: SCU Press.Google Scholar
  38. Miller, P. 2009. Professional development for research supervisors. In Professional Doctorate Research in Australia: Commentary and case studies from business, education and indigenous studies, ed. P. Miller and T. Marchant, 43–54. Lismore: SCU Press.Google Scholar
  39. Morley, C. 2005. Supervising professional doctorate research is different. In Supervising postgraduate research: Contexts and processes, theories and practices, ed. P. Green, 106–123. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.Google Scholar
  40. National Board of Employment, Education and Training (NBEET). 1989. Review of Australian graduate studies and higher degree. Canberra: Department of Education, employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  41. Neumann, R. 2005. Doctoral differences: Professional Doctorates and PhDs compared. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 (2): 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Neumann, R., and M. Goldstein. 2002. Issues in the ongoing development of professional doctorates: The DBA example. Journal of Institutional Research 11: 23–37.Google Scholar
  43. Paul, A.M., and V. Long. 2016. Human-capital strategies to build world-class research universities in Asia. The transnational politics of higher education: Contesting the global/transforming the local. In The transnational politics of higher education: Contesting the global/transforming the local, ed. Chou Meng-Hsuan, I. Kamola, and T. Pietsch, 130–155. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Pearson, M., Evans, T. and Macauley, P. 2008. Growth and diversity in doctoral education: assessing the Australian experience. Higher Education 55 (3): 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pervan, S., D. Blackman, T. Sloan, M. Wallace, A. Vocino, and C. Byrne. 2016. Framing the socialisation process of the DBA candidate: What can universities offer and what should candidates bring? Studies in Continuing Education 38 (1): 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2015.1120191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rynes, S.L., T.L. Giluk, and K.G. Brown. 2007. The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: Implications for evidence-based management. Academy of Management Journal 50 (5): 987–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sakurai, Y., K. Pyhalto, and S. Lindblom-Ylanne. 2012. Factors affecting international doctoral students’ academic engagement, satisfaction with their studies, and dropping out. International Journal for Researcher Development 3 (2): 99–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sarros, J.C., R.J. Willis, and T. Hardie. 2004. The DBA in Australia and the Asia Pacific: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour 7 (8): 440–455.Google Scholar
  49. Sarros, J.C., R.J. Willis, R. Fisher, and A. Storen. 2007. DBA examination procedures and protocols. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27: 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scott, D., A. Brown, I. Lunt, and L. Thorne. 2004. Professional doctorates: Integrating professional and academic knowledge, Society for Research into Higher Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Shrivastava, P. 1987. Rigor and practical usefulness of research in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 8 (1): 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, K.M., E. Crookes, and P.A. Crookes. 2013. Measuring research ‘impact’ for academic promotion: Issues from the literature. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 35 (4): 410–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wallace, M., S. Pervan, T. Sloan, A. Vocino, D. Blackman. 2014. Developing higher level skills and competencies for business in Australia: First understand the DBA and its candidate. EURAM conference. Valencia, June 3–5.Google Scholar
  54. Wallace, M., S. Pervan, C. Byrne, A. Vocino, D. Blackman, and T. Sloan. 2015a. A decade of change in Australia’s DBA landscape. Education + Training 57 (1): 31–47.  https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2013-0096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wallace, M., N. Sheldon, S. Pervan, T. Sloan, A. Vocino, and D. Blackman. 2015b. Mind the gap: Navigating the transition from coursework to thesis for candidates and supervisors in a professional doctorate program. EURAM Conference, Warsaw, 17–19 June.Google Scholar
  56. Wallace, M., N. Sheldon, S. Pervan, T. Sloan, A. Vocino, and D. Blackman. 2015c. The role of the DBA in Australia in enhancing career capital, professional and lifelong learning. ANZAM Conference, December.Google Scholar
  57. Wellington, J., and P. Sikes. 2006. A doctorate in a tight compartment: Why do students choose a professional doctorate and what impact does it have on their personal and professional lives? Studies in Higher Education 31 (6): 723–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yaghi, B. 2008. Research pentathlon: Front-end design Framework. Paper presented at the British Academy of Management Conference, Harrogate, September.Google Scholar
  59. Zeegers, M., and D. Barron. 2012. Pedagogical concerns in doctoral supervision: A challenge for pedagogy. Quality Assurance in Education 20: 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and TourismSouthern Cross UniversityCoolangattaAustralia
  2. 2.LismoreAustralia

Personalised recommendations