Abstract
This chapter considers the legitimacy authority of global human rights institutions, their right to have the final say on a question of human rights. It shows how human rights was transformed from a moral code to a set of binding international law obligations in the aftermath of the 1960 Sharpeville Massacre, allowing a role for “Charter bodies” and “Treaty bodies” to monitor the human rights situations in states. The main Charter body is the United Nations Human Rights Council; the nine core human rights treaties each have their own bespoke Treaty body, although these operate in similar ways. This work focuses on the interpretive authority of the Treaty bodies, which depends on the acceptance of that role by the states parties, a form of sociological legitimacy. This in turn relies on a recognition of their normative legitimacy, understood variously in terms of the Treaty bodies working within the constraints of the rules for interpretation outlined in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (legitimacy as legality), the need to adopt a pro homine (“in favor of the individual”) approach to interpretation (welfare enhancing, or output, legitimacy), the requirement to show the positions of the Treaty bodies are the result of their expert knowledge, following review of the states parties’ reports (epistemic legitimacy), and that the Treaty bodies reach their conclusions in a considered manner (procedural legitimacy). The chapter concludes that the legitimacy authority of the Treaty bodies depends on their ability to persuade, not to command.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Austin J (1885) Lectures on jurisprudence, 5th edn. John Murray, London
Bantekas I, Oette L (2016) International human rights law and practice, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Billaud J (2015) Keepers of the truth: producing “transparent” documents for the Universal Periodic Review. In: Charlesworth H, Larking E (eds) Human rights and the Universal Periodic Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 63–83
Buergenthal T (2001) The UN Human Rights Committee. In: Frowein JA, Wolfrum R (eds) Max Planck yearbook of United Nations law and International Law, Heidelberg. vol 5. pp 341–398. http://www.mpil.de/en/pub/publications/periodic-publications/max-planck-yearbook/volume-5.cfm
Chauville R (2015) The Universal Periodic Review’s first cycle: successes and failures. In: Charlesworth H, Larking E (eds) Human rights and the Universal Periodic Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 87–108
Cole W (2011) Individuals v states: the correlates of Human Rights Committee rulings, 1979–2007. Soc Sci Res 40:985–1000
Cowan J (2015) The Universal Periodic Review as a public audit ritual. In: Charlesworth H, Larkin E (eds) Human rights and the Universal Periodic Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 42–62
Crawford J (1997) An international criminal court? Conn J Int Law 12:255–264
Fitzmaurice M (2013) Interpretation of human rights treaties. In: Shelton D (ed) The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 739–771
Freedman R (2011) New mechanisms of the UN Human Rights Council. Neth Q Hum Rights 29:289–323
Ghandhi S (2011) Human rights and the International Court of Justice in the Ahmadou Sadio Diallo case. Hum Rights Law Rev 11:527–555
Goldsmith J (2000) Should international human rights law trump us domestic law? Chic J Int Law 1:327–339
Hobbes T [1651] (1968) Leviathan. Edited with an introduction by C.B. Macpherson. Penguin, London
Human Rights Committee (2006) Mr. Yeo-Bum Yoon and Mr. Myung-Jin Choi v. Republic of Korea, Communication Nos. 1321/2004 and 1322/2004, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/88/D/1321-1322/2004
Human Rights Council resolution 5/1 (2007) Institution-building of the United Nations Human Rights Council, 18 June 2007
International Court of Justice (2010) Case concerning Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of Congo), judgment 30 November 2010
Kälin W (2015) Ritual and ritualism at the Universal Periodic Review: a preliminary appraisal. In: Charlesworth H, Larking E (eds) Human rights and the Universal Periodic Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–41
Kothari M (2013) From Commission to the Council: evolution of UN charter bodies. In: Shelton D (ed) The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 587–620
Kretzmer D (2008) Human rights, state reports. Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. Available at http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL. Accessed 5 Apr 2018
Lauren P (2003) The evolution of international human rights, 2nd edn. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia
Lauterpacht H (1948) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Br Year Book Int Law 25:354–381
Locke J [1689] (1960) John Locke, two treatises of government. Edited with an introduction by Peter Laslett. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lodge T (2011) Sharpeville: an apartheid massacre and its consequences. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Mechlem K (2009) Treaty bodies and the interpretation of human rights. Vanderbilt J Transnatl Law 42:905–947
Milewicz K, Goodin R (2018) Deliberative capacity building through international organizations: the case of the Universal Periodic Review of human rights. Br J Polit Sci 48(2):513–533
O’Neill O (2001) Agents of justice. Metaphilosophy 32:180–195
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2005) Factsheet No. 15 (Rev) Civil and political rights: the Human Rights Committee. United Nations, Geneva
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2010) Report on the working methods of the human rights treaty bodies relating to the State party reporting process, UN Doc. HRI/ICM/2010/2, 10 May 2010
Pillay N (2012) Strengthening the United Nations human rights treaty body system. Available at http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/HRTD/docs/HCReportTBStrengthening.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2018
Quiroga CM (2013) The role of international tribunals: law-making or creative interpretation? In: Shelton D (ed) The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 649–669
Raz J (1979) The authority of law. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Rodley N (2013) The role and impact of treaty bodies. In: Shelton D (ed) The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 621–648
Rodley N (2015) The International Court of Justice and Human Rights Treaty Bodies. In: Andenas M, Bjorge E (eds) A farewell to fragmentation: reassertion and convergence in international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 87–108
Shelton D (2006) Human rights, individual communications/complaints. Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. Available at http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL. Accessed 5 Apr 2018
Simma B (2012) Mainstreaming Human Rights: The Contribution of the International Court of Justice. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 3(1):7
Subedi S, Wheatley S et al (2011) The role of the special rapporteurs of the United Nations Human Rights Council in the development and promotion of international human rights norms. Int J Hum Rights 15:155–161
Tobin J (2010) Seeking to persuade: a constructive approach to human rights treaty interpretation. Harv Hum Rights J 23:1–50
Tomuschat C (2011) Universal Periodic Review: a new system of international law with specific ground rules? In: Fastenrath U et al (eds) From bilateralism to community interest: essays in honour of Judge Bruno Simma. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 609–628
Ulfstein G (2011) Human rights, state complaints. Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. Available at http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL. Accessed 5 Apr 2018
Ulfstein G (2012) Treaty bodies and regimes. In: Hollis D (ed) The Oxford guide to treaties. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 428–447
UN General Assembly resolution 60/251 (2006) UN Doc. A/RES/60/251, 15 Mar 2006
United Nations (1967) Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1966, vol II. United Nations, New York
United Nations (1968) Proclamation of Teheran, Final Act of the International Conference on Human Rights, Teheran, 22 April to 13 May 1968, UN Doc. A/CONF.32/41
Waibel M (2015) Interpretive communities in international law. In: Bianchi A et al (eds) Interpretation in international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 147–165
Wolff RP (1970) In defence of anarchism. University of California Press, Berkeley
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Wheatley, S. (2018). Introduction to Human Rights Institutions: Legitimacy and Authority. In: Oberleitner, G. (eds) International Human Rights Institutions, Tribunals, and Courts. International Human Rights. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5206-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5206-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5205-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5206-4
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences