Advertisement

The European Court of Human Rights: Achievements and Prospects

  • Philip Leach
Living reference work entry
Part of the International Human Rights book series (IHR)

Abstract

This chapter discusses and analyses the origins, workings, and future prospects of the most significant human rights mechanism that Europe has seen – the European Court of Human Rights. Created by European governments in the immediate aftermath of the atrocities experienced during World War II, over the ensuing decades, the Court has laid down a remarkably comprehensive set of standards for states in upholding core civil and political rights, notably the right to a fair trial, the prohibition of torture, and the right to freedom of expression. As state accession to the Council of Europe increased following the breakup of the former Yugoslavia and the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the Court has been faced with increasing numbers of large-scale systemic cases which have necessitated changes in its practice and procedure and a more creative, incisive approach to providing redress. The Court has succeeded in setting credible standards for the continent (and beyond) but has been weighed down with a huge back load of cases for several decades. Within a regional polity that has become less receptive and indeed increasingly hostile, toward the very concept of human rights, the future challenges for the Court are to maintain its independence, its legitimacy, and its potency as a safety net for victims of human rights violations across the continent.

Keywords

European Court of Human Rights Council of Europe European Convention on Human Rights Jurisprudence Redress Implementation 

References

  1. Bates E (2010) The evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: from its inception to the creation of a permanent court of human rights. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackburn R, Polakiewicz J (eds) (2001) Fundamental rights in Europe: the ECHR and its member states, 1950–2000. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Bratza N (2011) The relationship between the UK courts and Strasbourg. Eur Hum Rights Law Rev 5:505–512Google Scholar
  4. Buckley C, Donald A, Leach P (eds) (2016) Towards coherence in international human rights law: approaches of regional and international systems. Brill (Martinus Nijhoff), LeidenGoogle Scholar
  5. Council of Europe (2010) The conscience of Europe – 50 years of the European Court of Human Rights. Third Millennium Publishing Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Donald A, Leach P (2016) Parliaments and the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Early L, Austin A, Ovey C, Chernishova O (eds) (2016) The right to life under article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights – twenty years of legal developments since McCann v. the United Kingdom. Will-Jan van der Wolf, OisterwijkGoogle Scholar
  8. Føllesdal A, Schlütter B, Ulfstein G (eds) (2013) Constituting Europe – the European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and global context. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldhaber M (2009) A people’s history of the European Court of Human Rights. Rutgers University Press, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  10. Hale B (2011) Common law and convention law: the limits to interpretation. Eur Hum Rights Law Rev 5:534–543Google Scholar
  11. Keller H, Stone Sweet A (eds) (2008) A Europe of rights – the impact of the ECHR on national legal systems. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Lambert Abdelgawad E (ed) (2011) Preventing and sanctioning hindrances to the right of individual petition before the European Court of Human Rights. Intersentia, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Leach P (2008) The Chechen conflict: analysing the oversight of the European Court of Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review 6:732–761Google Scholar
  14. Leach P (2013) The European system and approach. In: Sheeran S, Rodley N (eds) Routledge handbook of international human rights law. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  15. Leach P (2017) Taking a case to the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Leach P, Paraskeva C, Uzelac G (2009) International human rights and fact-finding – an analysis of the fact-finding missions conducted by the European Commission and Court of Human Rights. London Metropolitan University, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Leach P, Hardman H, Stephenson S, Blitz B (2010) Responding to systemic human rights violations – an analysis of pilot judgments of the European Court of Human Rights and their impact at national level. Intersentia, AntwerpGoogle Scholar
  18. Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (2016) Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights in states parties: Selected examples, AS/Jur/Inf (2016) 04. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmahl S, Breuer M (eds) (2017) The council of Europe – its law and policies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

European Court of Human Rights Jurisprudence

  1. A and others v. United Kingdom, Application No. 3455/05, Judgment of 19 February 2009Google Scholar
  2. A, B & C v. Ireland, Application No. 25579/05, Judgment of 16 December 2010Google Scholar
  3. Alekseyev v. Russia, Application Nos. 4916/07, 25924/08 & 14599/09, Judgment of 22 October 2010Google Scholar
  4. Al-Skeini v. United Kingdom, Application No. 55721/07, Judgment of 7 July 2011Google Scholar
  5. Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, Application Nos. 2944/06 et al, Judgment of 18 December 2012Google Scholar
  6. Bouyid v. Belgium, Application No. 23380/09, Judgment of 28 September 2015Google Scholar
  7. Broniowski v. Poland, Application No. 31443/96, Judgment of 22 June 2004Google Scholar
  8. Castells v. Spain, Application No. 11798/85, Judgment of 23 April 1992Google Scholar
  9. Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania, Application No. 47848/08, Judgment of 17 July 2014Google Scholar
  10. Chiragov and Others v. Armenia, Application No. 13216/05, Judgment of 16 June 2015Google Scholar
  11. Diri v. Turkey, Application No. 68351/01, Judgment of 31 July 2007Google Scholar
  12. Dudgeon v. United Kingdom, Application No. 7525/76, Judgment of 23 September 1981Google Scholar
  13. El-Masri v. the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Application No. 39630/09, Judgment of 13 December 2012Google Scholar
  14. Evans v. United Kingdom, Application No. 6399/05, Judgment of 10 April 2007Google Scholar
  15. Gäfgen v. Germany, Application No. 22978/05, Judgment of 1 June 2010Google Scholar
  16. Greens and M.T. v. United Kingdom, Application Nos. 60041/08 and 60054/08, Judgment of 23 November 2010Google Scholar
  17. Handyside v. United Kingdom, Application No. 5493/72, Judgment of 7 December 1976Google Scholar
  18. Hassan v. United Kingdom, Application No. 29750/09, Judgment of 16 September 2014Google Scholar
  19. Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, Application No. 15172/13, Judgment of 22 May 2014Google Scholar
  20. Ireland v. United Kingdom, Application, No. 5310/71, Judgment of 18 January 1978Google Scholar
  21. Lashmankin v. Russia, Application No. 57818/09, Judgment of 7 February 2017Google Scholar
  22. Lautsi and Others v. Italy, Application No. 30814/06, Judgment of 18 March 2011Google Scholar
  23. Leyla Sahin v Turkey, Application No. 44774/98, Judgment of 10 November 2005Google Scholar
  24. M.C. v. Bulgaria, Application No. 39272/98, Judgment of 4 December 2003Google Scholar
  25. M.S.S. v Belgium and Greece, Application No. 30696/09, Judgment of 21 January 2011Google Scholar
  26. Malone v. United Kingdom, Application No. 8691/79, Judgment of 2 August 1984Google Scholar
  27. Merabishvili v. Georgia, Application No. 72508/13, Judgment of 28 November 2017Google Scholar
  28. Observer and Guardian v. United Kingdom, Application No. 13585/88, Judgment of 26 November 1991Google Scholar
  29. Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, Application No. 21722/11, Judgment of 9 January 2013Google Scholar
  30. Opuz v. Turkey, Application No. 33401/02, Judgment of 9 June 2009Google Scholar
  31. Othman (Abu Qatada) v. United Kingdom, Application No. 8139/09, Judgment of 17 January 2012Google Scholar
  32. R.R. v. Hungary, Application No. 8139/09, Judgment of 4 December 2012Google Scholar
  33. Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, Application No. 25965/04, Judgment of 7 January 2010Google Scholar
  34. Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, Application No. 69981/14, Judgment of 17 March 2016Google Scholar
  35. Roman Zakharov v. Russia, Application No. 47143/06, Judgment of 4 December 2015Google Scholar
  36. Rustavi 2 Broadcasting Company v. Georgia, Application No. 16812/17 (pending) 2017Google Scholar
  37. Saadi v. Italy, Application No. 37201/06, Judgment of 28 February 2008Google Scholar
  38. Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan, Application No. 40167/06, Judgment of 16 June 2015Google Scholar
  39. Siliadin v. France, Application No. 73316/01, Judgment of 26 July 2005Google Scholar
  40. Soering v. United Kingdom, Application No. 14038/88, Judgment of 7 July 1989Google Scholar
  41. Sunday Times v. United Kingdom (No. 1), Application No. 6538/74, Judgment of 26 April 1979Google Scholar
  42. Sürek v. Turkey (No. 1), Application No. 26682/95, Judgment of 8 July 1999Google Scholar
  43. United Communist Party of Turkey and others v. Turkey, Application No. 19392/92, Judgment of 30 January 1998Google Scholar
  44. Yordanova v. Bulgaria, Application No. 25446/06, Judgment of 24 April 2012Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Professor of Human Rights Law; Director, European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC)Middlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations