Abstract
In much health and social scientific research that includes “vulnerable,” “hard-to-reach” or marginalized groups, claims are often made about participatory methods and techniques that enhance participant engagement and “voice.” In many cases, however, the validity of these claims remains unclear – the nature and extent of participant involvement in such studies is not always defined and the value and efficacy, as well as the challenges, of using participatory methods are often misunderstood. In many respects, these oversights can be explained by the lack of cognate and applicable participatory models or frameworks that can help researchers work more effectively with marginalized participants. This chapter explores these issues drawing on the author’s own extensive research with marginalized groups and participatory models of working that both promote and enhance participant engagement and emancipation in research processes. Such approaches see “vulnerable,” marginalized, or socially excluded research participants in transformative roles in research, including as co-researchers, co-analysts, and designers and producers of their own research agendas and projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Aldridge J. Picture this: the use of participatory photographic research methods with people with learning disabilities. Disabil Soc. 2007;22(1):1–17.
Aldridge J. The participation of vulnerable children in photographic research. Vis Stud. 2012a;27(1):48–58.
Aldridge J. Working with vulnerable groups in social research: dilemmas by default and design. Qual Res. 2012b;14(1):112–30.
Aldridge J. Participatory research: working with vulnerable groups in social research. Sage Research Methods Cases. 2014. https://doi.org/10.4135/978144627305014540252.
Aldridge J. Participatory research: working with vulnerable groups in research and practice. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2015.
Aldridge J, Sharpe D. Pictures of young caring. Loughborough: Young Carers Research Group, Loughborough University; 2007.
Atkinson D. Engaging competent others: a study of the support networks of people with a mental handicap. Br J Soc Work. 1986;16:83–101.
Atkinson D. An auto/biographical approach to learning disability research. Aldershot: Ashgate; 1997.
Biggs S. Resource-poor farmer participation in research: a synthesis of experiences from nine national agricultural research systems. OFCOR (On-Farm Client-Oriented Research) Comparative Study Paper 3. The Hague: International Service for National Agricultural Research; 1989.
Boddy J, Oliver C. Research governance in children’s services: the scope for new advice. London: Thomas Coram Research Unit, Department for Education; 2010.
Bourdieu P. Understanding. Theory Cult Soc. 1996;13(2):17–37.
Britzman D. Who has the floor? Curriculum teaching and the English student teacher’s struggle for voice. Curric Inq. 1989;19(2):143–62.
Catalani C, Minkler M. Photovoice: a review of the literature. London: Centre for Narrative Research, University of East London; 2010. www.uel.ac.uk/cnr.
Chataway C. An examination of the constraints on mutual inquiry in a participatory action research project. J Soc Issues. 1997;53(4):747–65.
Chevalier JM, Buckles DJ. Participatory action research: theory and methods for engaged enquiry. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013.
Cornwall A, Jewkes R. What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(12):1667–76.
Department of Health (DH). No secrets: guidance on developing and implementing multi-agency policies and procedures to protect vulnerable adults from abuse. London: DH; 2000.
Department of Health. Research governance framework for health and social care. London: DH; 2005. www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4122427.pdf.
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). Framework for research ethics [updated September 2012]. 2010. www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/framework-for-research-ethics-09-12_tcm8-4586.pdf.
Fals Borda O. Knowledge and people’s power: lessons with peasants in Nicaragua, Mexico and Colombia. New York: New Horizons Press; 1988.
Flynn M. Independent living for adults with mental handicap: a place of my own. London: Cassell; 1989.
Goodley D, Moore M. Doing disability research: activist lives and the academy. Disabil Soc. 2000;15(6):861–82.
Goodson IF. Developing narrative theory: life histories and personal representation. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013.
Hart RA. Children’s participation from tokenism to citizenship. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre; 1992. www.freechild.org/ladder.htm.
Higginbottom G, Liamputtong P, editors. Participatory qualitative research methodologies in health. London: SAGE; 2015.
Hill M, Davis J, Prout A, Tisdall K. Moving the participation agenda forward. Child Soc. 2004;18(2):77–96.
Hurdley R. In the picture or off the wall? Ethical regulation, research habitus and unpeopled ethnography. Qual Inq. 2010;16(6):517–28.
Joanou JP. The bad and the ugly: ethical concerns in participatory photographic methods with children living and working on the streets of Lima, Peru. Vis Stud. 2009;2(3):214–23.
Larkin M. Vulnerable groups in health and social care. London: SAGE; 2009.
Lewis A, Porter J. Interviewing children and young people with learning disabilities: guidelines for researchers and multi-professional practice. Br J Learn Disabil. 2004;32(4):191–7.
Liamputtong P. Researching the vulnerable: a guide to sensitive research methods. London: SAGE; 2007.
Lieblich A, Tuval-Mashiach R, Zilber T, editors. Narrative research: reading, analysis, and interpretation. London: SAGE; 1998.
McTaggart R, editor. Participatory action research: international contexts and consequences. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1997.
Moore LW, Miller M. Initiating research with doubly vulnerable populations. J Adv Nurs. 1999;30(5):1034–40.
O’Neill M, Giddens S, Breatnach P, Bagley C, Bourne D, Judge T. Renewed methodologies for social research: ethno-mimesis as performative praxis. Sociol Rev. 2002;50(1):69–88.
Parrott L, Jacobs G, Roberts D. Stress and resilience factors in parents with mental health problems and their children, Social Care Institute for Excellence Research Briefing, vol. 23. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence; 2008.
Rapoport RN. Three dilemmas in action research. Hum Relat. 1970;26(3):499–513.
Rapport F. The poetry of holocaust survivor testimony: towards a new performative social science. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2008;9(2):1–16. article 28.
Rogers AC. Vulnerability, health and health care. J Adv Nurs. 1997;27:65–72.
Sempik J, Aldridge J, Becker S. Health, well-being and social inclusion: therapeutic horticulture in the UK. Bristol: Policy Press; 2005.
Steel R. Involving marginalised and vulnerable groups in research: a consultation document. Involve. London: NHS; 2001.
Thomson P, editor. Doing visual research with children and young people. London: Routledge; 2008.
Walker R, Schratz B, Egg P. Seeing beyond violence: visual research applied to policy and practice. In: Thomson P, editor. Doing visual research with children and young people. Abingdon: Routledge; 2008. p. 164–74.
Walmsley J, Johnson K. Inclusive research with people with learning disabilities: past, present and futures. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2003.
Whyte WF. Advancing scientific knowledge through participatory action research. Sociol Forum. 1989;4(3):367–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Aldridge, J. (2017). “With Us and About Us”: Participatory Methods in Research with “Vulnerable” or Marginalized Groups. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_126-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_126-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2779-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences