Skip to main content

Blended Leadership: From Conceptualization to Practice

Professional and Support Staff in Higher Education

Part of the book series: University Development and Administration ((UDAA))

  • 137 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter has a dual purpose; first, to present recent research findings on leadership in the higher education sector that provides the best opportunity to build collaboration between professional staff and academics and, second, to introduce the six following chapters that provide case studies of how leadership for collaboration between administrative and professional staff and academics in universities can be built. The chapter first identifies the changing context of universities that is resulting in increasingly complex and more diverse work carried out by a more divergent group of administrative and professional staff and academics. It then presents a summary of some of the recent research into leadership in higher education, relying primarily on recent Australian empirical research into how to build leadership capacity for learning and teaching in Australian universities. This research identifies the value of a distributed leadership approach in not only building leadership capacity but also in encouraging collaboration between administrative and professional staff and academics in a “third space” where the expertise of all is shared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ALTC. 2011. Report: Leadership for excellence in learning and teaching, completed and continuing leadership projects. Strawberry Hills: ALTC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J., S. Jones, and B. Novak. 2009. Student feedback and leadership. Final Report. http://www.altc.edu.au/resource-leadership-assessment-rmit-2009. Retrieved 1 June 2017.

  • Bolden, R., J. Gosling, A. O’Brien, K. Peters, M. Ryan, and A. Haslam. 2012. Academic leadership: Changing conceptions, identities and experiences in UK higher education. Final report research and development series. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, L., and S. Rayner. 2015. Managing leadership in university reform: Data-led decision-making, the cost of learning and déjà vu. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 43 (2): 290–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesterton, P., P. Duignan, E. Felton, K. Flowers, P. Gibbons, M. Horne, T. Thomas, and T. Koop. 2008. Development of distributed institutional leadership capacity in online learning and teaching project: Final report. Strawberry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved 23 Mar 2017 from http://www.olt.gov.au.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. 1995. The rise of the Australian Institute of Tertiary Administrators as a professional association, M.Ed. Admin. Thesis, University of New England, Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H., and S. Jones. 2014. The work of leadership in tertiary education management. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 36 (4, Special Issue): 367–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D., P. Gronn, and E. Salas. 2004. Leadership capacity in teams. The Leadership Quarterly 15 (6): 857–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. 1998. New managerialism in higher education: The management of performance and cultures in universities. International Studies in Sociology of Education 8 (1): 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, I.R. 2000. ‘Them and us’ – General and non-general staff in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 22 (2): 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst and Young. 2014. University of the future. Available at www.ey.com/au. Accessed 8 May 2016.

  • Fraser, J., and M. Harvey. 2008. Leadership and assessment: Strengthening the nexus. Final report. Strawberry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Available from http://www.olt.edu.au/resource-leadership-assessment-mq-2008. Retrieved 1 Mar 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. 2000. Distributed properties. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 28 (3): 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. 2002. Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly 13: 423–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, R., C. Baik, V. Millar, R. Naylor, E. Bexley, G. Kennedy, K.-L. Krause, M. Hughes-Warrington, D. Sadler, S. Booth, and C. Booth. 2015. Advancing the quality and status of teaching in Australian higher education. Final Report to the Office for Learning and Teaching. Available at http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-library. Accessed 27 June 2016.

  • Jones, S., M. Harvey, G. Lefoe, and K. Ryland. 2012a. Lessons learnt: Identifying synergies in distributed leadership projects. Final Report. Office for Learning and Teaching. Retrieved 23 Mar 2015 from http://www.olt.gov.au.

  • Jones, S., G. Lefoe, M. Harvey, and K. Ryland. 2012b. Distributed leadership: A collaborative framework for academics, executive and professionals in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 34 (1): 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., R. Hadgraft, M. Harvey, G. Lefoe, and K. Ryland. 2014a. Evidence-based benchmarking framework for a distributed leadership approach to capacity building in learning and teaching. Final Report. Office for Learning and Teaching. Retrieved 23 Aug 2016 from http://www.olt.gov.au.

  • Jones, S., M. Harvey, and G. Lefoe. 2014b. A conceptual approach for blended leadership for tertiary education institutions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 36 (4): 418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. J. 2006. Issues in the development of leadership for learning and teaching in higher education. Sydney: ALTC Exchange. Retrieved 3 Jan 2017 from http://www.altc.edu.au/resource-issues-development-leadership-learning-macquarie.

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). The theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50(4):370–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnis, C. 1998. Academics and professional administrators in Australian universities; dissolving boundaries and tensions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 20 (2): 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMaster, M. 2011. Partnerships between administrators and academic managers: How deans and faculty managers work together. ATEM Publications. Retrieved 23 Jan 2017 from http://www.atem.org.au/publications/research/partnerships-between-administrative-and-academic-managers-how-deans-and-faculty-managers-work-together.

  • Parrish, D., and G. Lefoe. 2008. The GREEN report: Growing, reflecting, enabling, engaging, networking. Final report. Strawberry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. http://www.altc.edu.au/resource-leadership-assessment-ouw-2008. Retrieved 1 Sept 2017.

  • Ramsden, P. 1998. Learning to lead in higher education. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, L. 2012. Transforming a university: A study of process leadership. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal 16 (2): pp 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G., and L. McKellar. 2012. Leading professionals in Australia and New Zealand tertiary education. Report to Association of Tertiary Education Management. Retrieved 6 June 2016 from http://www.atem.org.au/publications/occastional-papers.

  • Scott, G., H. Coates, and M. Anderson. 2008. Learning leaders in times of change. Report to Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Sydney: University of Western Sydney & Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved 20 Mar 2016 from http://www.olt.gov.au.

  • Szekeres, J. 2004. The invisible worker. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 26 (1): 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. 2008a. Beyond administration and management: Reconstructing the identities of professional staff in UK higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management 30 (4): 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800802383042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. 2008b. Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: The emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education. Higher Education Quarterly 62 (4): 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00387.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. 2009. The rise of the blended professional in higher education: A comparison between the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States. Higher Education 58 (3): 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9202-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. 2012. Reconstructing identities in higher education: The rise of “third space” professionals. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, P.A., N. Bennett, J.A. Harvey, and C. Wise. 2004. Variabilities and dualities in distributed leadership: Findings from a systematic literature review. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership 32 (4): 439–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Jones, S. (2018). Blended Leadership: From Conceptualization to Practice. In: Bossu, C., Brown, N. (eds) Professional and Support Staff in Higher Education. University Development and Administration. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1607-3_33-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1607-3_33-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1607-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1607-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Blended Leadership: From Conceptualization to Practice
    Published:
    30 October 2018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1607-3_33-3

  2. Blended Leadership: From Conceptualization to Practice
    Published:
    30 June 2018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1607-3_33-2

  3. Original

    Blended Leadership: From Conceptualization to Practice
    Published:
    02 November 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1607-3_33-1