Capacity Assessment

  • Carmelle Peisah
Living reference work entry
Part of the Mental Health and Illness Worldwide book series (MHIW)


Capacity is the ability to make decisions. Autonomy in decision-making and being safeguarded against abuse and undue influence are fundamental human rights. This chapter will demonstrate how “good” capacity assessment can support these human rights. The assessment of capacity is a complex and highly specialized task, governed by principles of the presumption of capacity, that capacity is not diagnosis bound, and the need for individualized, task-, and situation-specific assessments. The clinician engaged to undertake a capacity assessment has a responsibility to act as gatekeeper, and sometimes advocate, for the actualization of human rights. Capacity assessment presents opportunities to identify strengths and weaknesses to inform and enable supported decision-making. It also provides opportunities and obligations to identify abuse. When people with disability such as mental illness are empowered to make the decisions they are capable of making, while protected from making the decisions they are incapable of making, human rights are supported. Such principles are universal, regardless of the jurisdictional variations in the laws that govern capacity and competency determinations internationally.


Capacity Human rights Assessment Abuse Supported decision-making Mental illness Dementia 


  1. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH (1982) Competency to consent to research. Arch Gen Psychiatry 39:951–958CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashdown B (2014) Legal capacity and case guardians- part 1. Legal capacity. Fam Law Rev 4(1):25. Accessed May 2016 Google Scholar
  3. Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) (2014) Equality, capacity and disability in commonwealth laws. Discussion Paper 81. Accessed online 25 May 2015
  4. Bamford C, Bruce E (2000) Defining the outcomes of community care: the perspectives of older people with dementia and their carers. Ageing Soc 20:543–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. British Medical Association and The Law Society (2004) Assessment of mental capacity – guidance for doctors and lawyers, 2nd edn. BMJ Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Browning M, Bigby C, Douglas J (2014) Supported decision making: understanding how its conceptual link to legal capacity is influencing the development of practice. Res Pract Intellect Dev Disabil. doi:10.1080/23297018.2014.902726Google Scholar
  7. Clare L, Whitaker R, Woods RT, Quinn C, Jelley H, Hoare Z, Woods J, Downs M, Wilson BA (2013) AwareCare: a pilot randomized controlled trial of an awareness-based staff training intervention to improve quality of life for residents with severe dementia in long-term care settings. Int Psychogeriatr 25:128–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Darzins P, Molloy DW, Strang D (eds) (2000) Who can decide? The six step capacity assessment process. Memory Australia, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  9. Davie V (1953) Lord provost, magistrates and councillors of the city of Edinburgh, SC 34 at 39–40Google Scholar
  10. de Boer ME et al (2010) Advance directives in dementia: issues of validity and effectiveness. Int Psychogeriatr 22:201–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fick D, Foreman M (2000) Consequences of not recognizing delirium superimposed on dementia in hospitalized elderly individuals. J Gerontol Nurs 26:30–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Flynn E, Arstein-Kerslake A (2012) “Equal recognition before the law: exploring a support model of legal capacity” 10 March 2012, ‘Equality: are we there yet?’ The Kent Critical Law Society Conference at the University of Kent, Canterbury, p 1Google Scholar
  13. Friedlander MM, Brayman Y, Breitbart WS (2004) Delirium in palliative care. Oncology 18:1541–1551PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Frost M, Lawson S, Jacoby R (2015) Testamentary Capacity Law Practice and Medicine. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Griffith HR, Belue K, Sicola A et al (2003) Impaired financial abilities in mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 60:449–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS (1995) Comparison of standards for assessing patients’ capacities to make treatment decisions. Am J Psychiatry 152(7):1033–1037CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS, Hill-Fotouhi C (1997) The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients’ capacities to make treatment decisions. Psychiatr Serv 48(11):1415–1419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hepner IJ, Woodward MN, Stewart J (2014) Giving the vulnerable a voice in the criminal justice system: the use of intermediaries with individuals with intellectual disability. Psychiatry Psychol Law. doi:10.1080/13218719.2014.960032Google Scholar
  19. Hertogh CMPM (2011) The misleading simplicity of advance directives. Int Psychogeriatr 23:511–515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hertogh CMPM (2015) Capacity and awareness: how to include people with decision making disability second international conference on capacity. IPA Congress, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. Hooper SC et al (1997) Preferences for voluntary euthanasia during major depression and following improvement in an elderly population. Aust J Ageing 16(1):3–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Inouye SK, Foreman MD, Mion LC, Katz KH, Cooney LM Jr (2001) Nurses’ recognition of delirium and its symptoms: comparison of nurse and researcher ratings. Arch Intern Med 161:2467–2473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Katona C, Chiu E, Adelman S, Baloyannis, Camus V, Firmino H, Gove D, Ghebrehiwet T, Graham N, Icelli I, Ihl R, Kalasic A, Leszek L, Kim S, Lima C d M, Peisah C, Tataru N, Warner J (2009) World psychiatric association section of old age psychiatry consensus conference on ethics and capacity in old people with mental disorders. Int J Geriatr Psychopharmacol 24:1319–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kershaw MM, Webber LS (2008) Assessment of financial competence. Psychiatry Psychol Law 15:40–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim SYH, Appelbaum PS (2006) The capacity to appoint a proxy and the possibility of concurrent proxy directives. Behav Sci Law 24:469–478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim SY, Karlawish JH, Kim HM, Wall IF, Bozoki AC, Appelbaum PS (2011a) Preservation of the capacity to appoint a proxy decision maker: implications for dementia research. Arch Gen Psychiatry 68(2):214–220CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim SYH, Appelbaum PS, Kim HM et al (2011b) Variability of judgments of capacity: experience of capacity evaluators in a study of research consent capacity. Psychosomatics 52:346–353CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Kolva EA, Rosenfeld B (2012) In: Demakis GJ (ed) Civil capacities in clinical neuropsychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 17–36Google Scholar
  29. Lawton LJ in R v Turner [1975] QB 834 at 840Google Scholar
  30. Leonard M, Donnelly S, Conroy M, Trzepacz P, Meagher DJ (2011) Phenomenological and neuropsychological profile across motor variants of delirium in a palliative care unit. J Neuropsychiatr Clin Neurosci 23:180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levene I, Parker M (2011) Prevalence of depression in granted and refused requests for euthanasia and assisted suicide: a systematic review. J Med Ethics 37:205–211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Liptzin, B. Peisah C., Shulman K. Finkel S. for the International Psychogeriatric Association Task Force on Wills and Testamentary Capacity (2010) Testamentary capacity and delirium. Int Psychogeriatr 22:950–956Google Scholar
  33. Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705, [at 743–744]Google Scholar
  34. Mason S, Barrow H, Phillips A et al (2006) Brief report on the experience of using proxy consent for incapacitated adults. J Med Ethics 32:61–62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Massie MJ, Holland J, Glass E (1983) Delirium in terminally ill cancer patients. Am J Psychiatr 140:1048–1050CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. McDougall, R. Expert evidence Accessed 1 April 2016
  37. Meagher DJ et al (2007) Phenomenology of delirium. Assessment of 100 adult cases using standardised measures. Br J Psychiatry 190:135–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Neill N., Peisah C (2017) Capacity and the law (2nd Edition), Australasian Legal Information Institute (AustLII) Communities. Available at
  39. Peisah C (2005) Reflections on changes in defining testamentary capacity. Int Psychogeriatr 17(4):709–712CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Peisah C, Forlenza O, Chiu E. (2009a) Ethics, capacity, and decision-making in the practice of old age psychiatry: an emerging dialogue. Curr Opin Psychiatry 22(6):519–521Google Scholar
  41. Peisah C., Finkel S., Shulman K., Melding P., Luxenberg J., Heinik J., Jacoby R., Reisberg B., Stoppe G., Barker A., Firmino H., Bennett H. for the International Psychogeriatric Association Task Force on Wills and Undue Influence (2009b) The wills of older persons: risk factors for undue influence. Int Psychogeriatr 21(1):7–15Google Scholar
  42. Peisah C, Vollmer-Conna, SYH K (2012) Capacity to consent to research. Asia-Pac Psychiatry 4:219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peisah C, Sorinmadeayo D, Mitchell L, Hertogh C (2013) Decisional capacity: towards an inclusionary approach. Int Psychogeriatr Assoc Task Force Capacit Int Psychogeriatr 25(10):1571–1579Google Scholar
  44. Peisah C, Tiwana R, Benbow SM (2014a) Sexual expression, consent and capacity in residential care: a person-centered, human rights approach. In: Book of proceedings of the 1st annual international capacity conference.
  45. Peisah C, Luxenberg J, Liptzin B, Wand A, Shulman K, Finkel S (2014b) Death bed wills: assessing testamentary capacity in the dying patient. Int Psychogeriatr Assoc Task Force Capacit (Int Psychogeriatr) 26(2):209–216Google Scholar
  46. Resnick B, Gruber –Baldini A.L, Pretzer-Aboff, Galik E Custis Buie V, Russ K, Zimmerman S. (2007) Reliability and validity of the evaluation to sign consent measure. The Gerontol 47:69–77Google Scholar
  47. Quinn G (2010) Personhood and legal capacity perspectives on the paradigm shift of article 12 CRPD HPOD Conference Harvard Law SchoolGoogle Scholar
  48. Ryan C, Callaghan S, Peisah C (2015) Assessing capacity to refuse psychiatric treatment: a guide for clinicians and tribunal members. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 49(4):324–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sabat S (2005) Capacity for decision making in Alzheimer’s disease: selfhood, positioning and semiotic people. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 39:1030–1035CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Shulman KI, Cohen CA, Hull I (2005) Psychiatric issues in retrospective challenges of testamentary capacity. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 20(1):63–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Shulman KI, Cohen CA, Kirsh FC, Hull IM, Champine PR (2007) Assessment of testamentary capacity and vulnerability to undue influence. Am J Psychiatr 164:722–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Shulman KI, Peisah C, Jacoby R, Finkel S et al (2009) Contemporaneous assessment of testamentary capacity. A consensus report from the IPA task force on testamentary capacity and undue influence. Int Psychogeriatr 21(3):433–439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Shulman KI, Himel SG, Hull IM, Peisah C, Amodeo S, Barnes C (2017) Banks v Goodfellow 1870: time to update the test for testamentary capacity. Can Bar Rev (in press)Google Scholar
  54. Sinyor M, Schaffer AM, Hull I, Peisah C, Shulman K (2015) Last will and testaments in a large sample of suicide notes: implications for testamentary capacity. Br J Psychiatry 206(1):72–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sousa LB, Simões MR, Firmino H, Peisah C (2014) Financial and testamentary capacity evaluations: procedures and assessment instruments underneath a functional approach. Int Psychogeriatr 26(2):217–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Stewart S, Woodward M, Hepner I (2015) Fitness to stand trial, human rights and possibilities from England and Wales. J Law Med 22(4):886–899PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tsoh J, Peisah C, Narumuto J, Masaru Mimura M, Wongpakaran N, Kato (2015) Cross national comparisons of substitute decision making across. Asia Aust Int Psychogeriatr 27(6):1029–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tulsky JA (2005) Beyond advance directives: importance of communication skills at the end of life. JAMA 294:359–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. United Nations Treaty Collection (2016) Accessed Mar 2016Google Scholar
  60. Voyer P, Richard S, Doucet L, Danjou C, Carmichael PH (2008) Detection of delirium by nurses among long-term care residents with dementia. BMC Nurs 7:4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Wiese M, Dew A, Stancliffe RJ, Howarth G, Balandin S (2013) ‘If and when?’: the beliefs and experiences of community living staff in supporting older people with intellectual disability to know about dying. J Intellect Disabil Res 57(10):980–992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Wiese M, Stancliffe RJ, Dew A, Balandin S, Howarth G (2014) What is talked about? Community living staff experiences of talking with older people with intellectual disability about dying and death. J Intellect Disabil Res 58(7):679–690CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wiese M, Stancliffe RJ, Read S, Jeltes G, Clayton JM (2015) Learning about dying, death, and end-of-life planning: current issues informing future actions. J Intellect Develop Disabil. doi:10.3109/13668250.2014.998183Google Scholar
  64. Wood S, O’Bryan M (2012) In: Demakis GJ (ed) Civil capacities in clinical neuropsychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 185–205Google Scholar
  65. Zuscak SJ, Peisah C, Ferguson A (2015) A collaborative approach to supporting communication in the assessment of decision-making capacity. Disabil Rehabil 12:1–8. epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NSW, Clinical Associate Professor, Sydney University, President Capacity AustraliaSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations