Skip to main content

Ethics of Social Media Research: State of the Debate and Future Challenges

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Second International Handbook of Internet Research

Abstract

Since the late 1990s, researchers have been investigating into the ethical issues of Internet research. Among the first works, AoIR Research Ethics Recommendations of 2002 can be mentioned. Internet research ethics issues are still compelling, especially about social media, that are consolidated fields of research but with ethical open questions that will be more and more complex in the future.

The chapter will go through these questions, focusing on selected keywords and summarizing for each one the debate, holes, and challenges for the future.

The chapter will begin with a definition of the key terms, such as Internet research ethics, social media, and social network sites, as an important step for assessing the ethical issues around social media research. The chapter will then address traditional issues about ethics, like privacy, informed consent, anonymization, Institutional Review Board, and traceability, and then it will focus on new topics, like Big Data, data storage and retrieval, and crowdsourcing work. Besides the specific issues, also broader approaches to privacy will be presented, such as the ones of distributed morality and distributed responsibility, as framework under which build a dialogue between the many actors involved (researchers, companies, users, data, algorithms, programmers).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acquisti A, Gross R (2009) Predicting social security numbers from public data. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(27):10975–10980. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904891106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu A (2004) Mediating ethnography: objectivity and the making of ethnographies of the internet. Soc Epistemol 18(2–3):139–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269172042000249264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu A, Estalella A (2012) Rethinking research ethics for mediated settings. Inf Commun Soc 15(1):23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman G, Albright K (2017) Children and the data cycle: rights and ethics in a big data world. In: Innocenti working paper 2017-05. UNICEF Office of Research, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd d (2010) Social network sites as networked publics: affordances, dynamics, and implications. In: Papacharissi Z (ed) Networked self: identity, community, and culture on social network sites. Routledge, New York, pp 39–58

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd d (2016) Untangling research and practice: What Facebook’s “emotional contagion” study teaches us, Research Ethics. Vol. 12(1):4–13

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd d, Crawford K (2012) Critical questions for big data. Inf Commun Soc 15(5):662–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckman A (2002) Studying the amateur artist: a perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the internet. Ethics Inf Technol 4(3):217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan E (2010) Internet research ethics: past, present, future. In: C. Ess and M. Consalvo, (eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Internet Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 83–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan E (2017) Internet research ethics. Twenty years later. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp xxix–xxxiii

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan EA, Ess C (2008) Internet research ethics: the field and its critical Issues. In: H.Tavani and K. E. Himma (eds) The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, Boston: Wiley, pp 273–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan EA, Ess C (2009) Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues. Comput Soc 39(3):43–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan EA, Zimmer M (2016) Internet Research Ethics. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 edn). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/ethics-internet-research/. Accessed 26 Oct 2017

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2014) Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, December 2014. http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2-2014/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2018

  • De Bruin B, Floridi L (2017) The ethics of cloud computing. Sci Eng Ethics 23:21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9759-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison NB, boyd d (2013) Sociality through social network sites. In: Dutton WH (ed) The Oxford handbook of internet studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0008

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ess C (2013) Digital media ethics, 2nd edn. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ess C (2017) Foreword. Grounding internet research ethics 3.0: a view from (the) AoIR. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp ix–xv

    Google Scholar 

  • Ess C, the AOIR Ethics Working Committee (2002) Ethical decision-making and internet research: recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. Available: www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2017

  • Eysenbach G, Till JE (2001) Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. BMJ 323(7321):1103–1105. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick C (2016) Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study. Res Ethics 12(1):14–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L (2013) Distributed morality in an information society. Sci Eng Ethics 19:727–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9413-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel MS, Siang S (1999) Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research in cyberspace. Report of the workshop held in Washington, DC on June 10–11, 1999. Retrieved from http://www.aaas.org/spp/sfrl/projects/intres/report.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2017

  • Garfinkel S, Cox D (2009) Finding and archiving the internet footprint. In: Paper, presented at the first digital lives research conference: personal digital archives for the 21st century, London, 9–11 Feb 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Giglietto F, Rossi L (2012) Ethics and interdisciplinarity in computational social science. Methodol Innov 7(1):25–36. https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2012.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hård af Segerstad Y, Kasperowski D, Kleinberg C, Howes C (2017) Studying closed communities on-line. Digital methods and ethical considerations beyond informed consent and anonymity. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 213–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Highfield T, Leaver T (2016) Instagrammatics and digital methods: studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Commun Res Pract 2:47–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1155332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hookway N (2008) Entering the blogosphere: Some strategies for using blogs in social research. Qual Res 8(1):91–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085298

  • Hutchinson J, Martin F, Sinpeng M (2017) Chasing ISIS. Network power, distributed ethics and responsible social media research. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 58–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan A, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world unite: the challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horizons 53(1):59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

  • Kitchin R (2017) Big data – hype or revolution? In: Sloan L, Quan-Haase A (eds) The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. Sage/Credo Reference, Los Angeles, pp 27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer ADI, Guillory JE, Hancock JT (2014) Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(24):8788–8790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaver T (2015) Researching the ends of identity: birth and death on social media. Social Media + Society 1(1):205630511557887. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115578877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone S, Locatelli E (2012) Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research with youth on/offline. Int J Learn Med 4:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1162/ijlm_a_00096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locatelli E (2017) Images of breastfeeding on Instagram: self-representation, publicness, and privacy management. Social Media + Society 3(2):205630511770719. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luka ME, Millette M, Wallace J (2017) A feminist perspective on ethical digital methods. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 22–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden M, Fox S, Smith A, Vitak J (2007) Online identity and management and search in the age of transparency. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_Digital_Footprints.pdf.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2017

  • Markham AN (2012) Fabrication as ethical practice: qualitative inquiry in ambiguous internet contexts. Inf Commun Soc 15(3):334–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markham A, Buchanan E (2012) Ethical decision-making and internet research recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (Version 2.0). Retrieved from http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2017

  • Matzner T, Ochs C (2017) Sorting things out ethically. Privacy as a research issue beyond the individual. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 40–52

    Google Scholar 

  • McCay-Peet L, Quan-Haase A (2017) What is social media and what questions can social media research help us answer? In: Sloan L, Quan-Haase A (eds) The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. Sage/Credo Reference, Los Angeles, pp 13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee I (2017) The social age of “It’s not a private problem”. Case study of ethical and privacy concerns in a digital ethnography of south Asian blogs against intimate partner violence. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 203–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum H (2010) Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittman M, Sheenan K (2017) Ethics of using online commercial crowdsourcing sites for academic research. The case of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 177–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Poor N, Davidson R (2018) Case Study: The Ethics of Using Hacked Data: Patreon’s Data Hack and Academic Data Standards. Council for Big Data, Ethics, and Society. Accessed July 22, 2018. https://bdes.datasociety.net/council-output/case-study-the-ethics-of-using-hacked-data-patreons-data-hack-and-academic-data-standards/

  • Pushmann C (2017) Bad judgement, bad ethics? Validity in computational social media research. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 96–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson J (2017) Participant anonymity and participant observation. Situating the researcher within digital ethnography. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 196–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Seko Y, Lewis SP (2017) “We tend to err on the side of caution”. Ethical challenges facing Canadian research ethics boards when overseeing internet research. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 133–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank DB (2016) Using crowdsourcing websites for sociological research: the case of amazon mechanical turk. Am Sociol 47(1):47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan L, Quan-Haase A (2017) A retrospective on state of the art social media research methods: ethical decisions, big-small data rivalries and the spectre of the 6Vs. In: Sloan L, Quan-Haase A (eds) The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. Sage/Credo Reference, Los Angeles, pp 662–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson SD (2016) Preserving Social Media. DPC Technology watch report 16-01 February 2016. https://doi.org/10.7207/twr16-01

  • Vayena E, Salathé M, Madoff l C, Brownstein JS (2015) Ethical challenges of big data in public health. PLoS Comput Biol 11(2):e1003904. https://doi.org/10.1371/journail.pcbi.1003904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther JB (2002) Research ethics in internet-enabled research: human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics Inf Technol 4:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller K, Kinder-Kurlanda K (2017) To share or not to share? Ethical challenges in sharing social media-based research. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 115–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteman N (2012) Undoing ethics. Rethinking practice in online research. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer M (2010) “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics Inf Technol 12:313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zook M, Barocas S, boyd d, Crawford K, Keller E, Gangadharan SP, Goodman A, Hollander R, Koenig BA, Metcalf J, Narayanan J, Nelson A, Pasquale F (2017) Ten simple rules for responsible big data research. PLOS Comput Biol 13(3):e1005399. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwitter A (2014) Big data ethics. Big Data Soc 1:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabetta Locatelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Locatelli, E. (2020). Ethics of Social Media Research: State of the Debate and Future Challenges. In: Hunsinger, J., Allen, M., Klastrup, L. (eds) Second International Handbook of Internet Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1555-1_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics