Advertisement

Disguised Propaganda from Digital to Social Media

  • Johan Farkas
  • Christina Neumayer
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Disguised propaganda and political deception in digital media have been studied since the early days of the World Wide Web. At the intersection of internet research and propaganda studies, this chapter explores disguised propaganda on websites and social media platforms. Based on a discussion of key concepts and terminology, this chapter outlines how new modes of deception and source obfuscation emerge in digital and social media environments, and how this development complicates existing conceptual and epistemological frameworks in propaganda studies. The chapter concludes by arguing that contemporary challenges of detecting and countering disguised propaganda can only be resolved, if social media companies are held accountable and provide the necessary support for user contestation.

Keywords

Disguised propaganda Manipulation Disinformation Fake news Deception Social media 

References

  1. Aro J (2016) The cyberspace war: propaganda and trolling as warfare tools. Eur View 15:121–132.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-016-0395-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auerbach J, Castronovo R (2013) Introduction: thirteen propositions about propaganda. In: Auerbach J, Castronovo R (eds) The Oxford handbook of propaganda studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baym NK (2015) Social media and the struggle for society. Soc Media + Soc 1:205630511558047.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115580477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker H (1949) The nature and consequences of black propaganda. Am Sociol Assoc 14:221–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benedictus L (2016) Invasion of the troll armies: from Russian Trump supporters to Turkish state stooges. GuardGoogle Scholar
  6. Bessi A, Ferrara E (2016) Social bots distort the 2016 us presidential election online discussionGoogle Scholar
  7. boyd d m, Ellison NB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput Commun 13:210–230.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castells M (2013) Communication power, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaykowski K (2017) Mark Zuckerberg: 2 Billion users means Facebook’s “Responsibility Is Expanding”. ForbesGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham SB (2002) The idea of propaganda: a Reconstruction. Praeger Publishers, Sanra BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahlberg L (2001) Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: a Critical Analysis. J Comput Commun 7(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daniels J (2008) Searching for Dr. King: Teens, race, and cloaked websites. In: Ennis E, Jones ZM, Mangiafico P, et al. (eds) Electronic techtonics: Thinking at the interface. Lulu Press, Durham NCGoogle Scholar
  13. Daniels J (2009a) Cloaked websites: propaganda, cyber-racism and epistemology in the digital era. New Media Soc 11:659–683.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809105345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daniels J (2009b) Cyber racism: white supremacy online and the new attack on civil rights. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Daniels J (2014) From crisis pregnancy Centers to Teenbreaks.com: anti-abortion activism’s use of cloaked websites. In: Cyberactivism on the participatory web, pp 140–154Google Scholar
  16. Donath JS (1998) Identity and deception in the virtual community. In: Smith MA, Kollock P (eds) Communities in cyberspace. Routledge, London, pp 22–58Google Scholar
  17. Ellison NB, Boyd DM (2013) Sociality through social network sites. In: Dutton WH (ed) The Oxford handbook of internet studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 151–172Google Scholar
  18. Ellul J (1965) Propaganda: the formation of Men’s attitudes. Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Farkas J, Neumayer C (2017) “Stop fake haete profiles on Facebook”: challenges for crowdsourced activism on social mediaGoogle Scholar
  20. Farkas J, Schou J, Neumayer C (2017) Cloaked Facebook pages: exploring fake Islamist propaganda in social media. New Media Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817707759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Farkas J, Schou J, Neumayer C (2018) Platformed antagonism: racist discourses on fake Muslim Facebook pages. Crit Dis Stud 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1450276.
  22. Floridi L (1996) Brave.Net.World: the internet as a disinformation superhighway? Electron Libr 14:509–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foot KA, Schneider SM (2002) Online action in campaign 2000: an exploratory analysis of the U.S. political web sphere. J Broadcast Electron Media 46:222–244.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4602_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Foxman AH, Wolf C (2013) Viral Hate. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Good KD (2013) From scrapbook to Facebook: a history of personal media assemblage and archives. New Media Soc 15:557–573.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812458432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hancock JT (2012) Digital deception: why, when and how people lie online. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Herman ES, Chomsky N (1988) Manufactoring consent: the political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Herman ES, Chomsky N (2008) Manufactoring consent: the political economy of the mass media. The Bodley Head, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Jowett GS, O’Donnell V (2012) Propaganda and Persuasion. SAGE, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  30. King G, Pan J, Robert ME (2017) How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. GkingHarvard.edu.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kollanyi B, Howard PN, Woolley SC (2016) Bots and automation over Twitter during the U.S. ElectionGoogle Scholar
  32. Leiser M (2016) AstroTurfing, “CyberTurfing” and other online persuasion campaigns. Eur J Law Technol 7:1–27Google Scholar
  33. Linebarger PMA (2010) Psychological warfare. Coachwhip Publications, Darke CountyGoogle Scholar
  34. Lippmann W (1946) Public opinion, vol 1. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick/LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Mihailovic A (2015) Hijacking authorty: academic neo-aryanism and internet expertise. In: Simpson PA, Druxes H (eds) Digital media strategies of the far right in Europe and the United States. Lexington Books, Lanham, pp 83–102Google Scholar
  36. Milan S (2013) Social movements and their technologies: wiring social change. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Reilly T (2005) What is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html. Accessed 6 Oct 2017
  38. Phillips W (2012) The house that fox built: anonymous, spectacle, and cycles of amplification. Telev New Media 14:494–509.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476412452799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Piper P (2001) Better read that again: web hoaxes and misinformationGoogle Scholar
  40. Poell T, van Dijck J (2015) Social media and activist communication. In: Atton C (ed) The Routledge companion to alternative and community media. Routledge, London, pp 527–537Google Scholar
  41. Roberts ST (2016) Commercial content moderation: digital Laborers’ dirty work. In: Noble SU, Tynes B (eds) The intersectional internet: race, sex, class and culture online. Peter Lang, New York, pp 147–160Google Scholar
  42. SantaVicca EF (1994) The internet as reference and research tool: a model for educators. Ref Libr 19:225–236Google Scholar
  43. Schou J, Farkas J (2016) Algorithms, interfaces, and the circulation of information: interrogating the epistemological challenges of Facebook. KOME – An. Int J Pure Commun Inq 4:36–49.  https://doi.org/10.17646/KOME.2016.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shao C, Ciampaglia GL, Varol O, Jul SI (2017) The spread of fake news by social bots. In: ArXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.07592v2. Accessed 5 Oct 2017
  45. Soley LC, Nichols JS (1987) Clandestine radio broadcasting: a study of revolutionary and counterrevolutionary electronic communication. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Sproule MJ (1994) Channels of propaganda. EDINFO Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  47. Tate M, Alexander J (1996) Teaching critical evaluation skills for world wide web resources. Comput Libr 16:49–54Google Scholar
  48. Thomson K (2011) White Supremacist Site MartinLutherKing.org Marks 12th Anniversary. Huffingt. PostGoogle Scholar
  49. Tong Y, Lei S (2013) War of position and microblogging in China. J Contemp China 22:292–311.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2012.734084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van Dijck J (2013) The culture of connectivity: a critical history of social media. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wakabayashi D, Shane S (2017) Twitter, with accounts linked to Russia, to face congress over role in election. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/27/technology/twitter-russia-election.html
  52. Winseck D (2008) Information operations ‘blowback’: communication, propaganda and surveillance in the global war on terrorism. Int Commun Gaz 70:419–441.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048508096141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang J, Carpenter D, Ko M (2013) Online astroturfing: a theoretical perspective. In: 19th am Conf Inf Syst AMCIS 2013, vol 4, pp 2559–2565Google Scholar
  54. Žižek S (2009) Violence: six sideways reflections. Profile Books, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Arts and CommunicationMalmö UniversityMalmöSweden
  2. 2.Digital Design DepartmentIT University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations