Advertisement

Science and Medicine on YouTube

Living reference work entry

Abstract

YouTube is a particularly popular online video sharing site. It is not only used for entertainment and commercial purposes but also to disseminate and obtain information and knowledge concerning science and medicine. So far rather little is known about science and health communication via online video sharing websites such as YouTube. In this chapter the limited but growing research literature on scholarly communication, science and medicine on YouTube is reviewed and summarized. It shows the major research developments and points out omissions and gaps of knowledge. The chapter closes with an outlook and reflects on how recent internet research ideas could be used to better understand and analyze science and medicine on YouTube.

Keywords

YouTube Online Video Webvideo Science Communication Health Communication Scholarly Communication Social Media 

References

  1. Abboudi H, Mikhail M, Ghazal-Aswad M, Michael M, Pope A (2016) YouTube as a source of patient information for ureteroscopy. J Clin Urol 9(4):248–251.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2051415815627915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ache KA, Wallace LS (2008) Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage on YouTube. Am J Prev Med 35(4):389–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allgaier J (2012) Singing about science. The Scientist, 4 Oct 2012. Retrieved 21 July 2015 from http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32729/title/Opinion--Singing-about-Science/
  4. Allgaier J (2013) On the shoulders of YouTube: science in music videos. Sci Commun 35(2):267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allgaier J (2014) The press and the public interest. In: Chadwick R, Levitt M, Shickle D (eds) The right to know and the right not to know: genetic privacy and responsibility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allgaier J (2016) Wo Wissenschaft auf Populärkultur trifft. In: Körkel T, Hoppenhaus K (eds) Web Video Wissenschaft. Ohne Bewegtbild läuft nichts mehr im Netz: Wie Wissenschaftsvideos das Publikum erobern. Spektrum der Wissenschaft, Heidelberg, pp 15–24 Online http://www.spektrum.de/fm/976/Web%20Video%20Wissenschaft%20Version%201_02.pdfGoogle Scholar
  7. Allgaier J, Svalastog AL (2015) The communication aspects of the Ebola virus disease outbreak in western Africa – do we need to counter one, two, or many epidemics? Croat Med J 56(5):496–499.  https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2015.56.496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Askanius T (2012) Radical online video: YouTube, video activism and social movement media practices, Lund studies in media and communication 17. Lund University, LundGoogle Scholar
  9. Askanius T, Uldam J (2011) Using corporate media for radical politics: COP15 activism and the case of ‘never trust a COP’ on YouTube. Int J Electron Govern 4(1–2):69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Austen EL, Beadle J, Lukeman S, Lukeman E, Aquino N (2017) Using a music video parody to promote breastfeeding and increase comfort levels among young adults. J Hum Lact 33(3):560–569.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334417706360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Basch CH, Basch CE, Ruggles KV, Hammond R (2015) Coverage of the Ebola virus disease epidemic on YouTube. Disaster Med Public Health Prep.  https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2015.77
  12. Beer D (2013) Popular culture and new media. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS et al (2001) Health information on the internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 285:2612–2621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bischof A, Both G (2015) Counting clicks instead of citations: YouTube videos as scientific currency. Paper presented at the 14th Annual STS Conference Graz, Austria, 11–12 May 2015Google Scholar
  15. Brake DR (2014) Are we all online content creators now? Web 2.0 and digital divides. J Comput-Mediat Commun 19(3):591–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Briones R, Nan X, Madden K, Waks L (2012) When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube. Health Commun 27:478–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burgess J, Green J (2009) YouTube: online video and participatory culture. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen H, Gilchrist SB (2013) Online access to higher education on YouTubeEDU. New Libr World 114(3/4):99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Lara A, García Avilés JA, Revuelta G (2017) Online video on climate change: a comparison between television and web formats. J Sci Commun 16(01), Online https://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/JCOM_1601_2017_A04.pdf
  20. Erviti MC, Stengler E (2016) Online science videos: an exploratory study with major professional content providers in the United Kingdom. J Sci Commun 15(06):A06 https://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/JCOM_1506_2016_A06.pdfGoogle Scholar
  21. Fagerjord A (2010) After convergence: YouTube and remix culture. In: Hunsinger J, Klastrup L, Allen M (eds) International handbook of internet research. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York, pp 187–200Google Scholar
  22. Fernandez-Luque L, Elahi N, Grajales FJ (2009) An analysis of personal medical information disclosed in YouTube videos created by patients with multiple sclerosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 150:292–296Google Scholar
  23. Gear DP (2015) YouTube’s plans for 10 more years of video domination. Retrieved 21 July 2015 from http://www.wired.com/2015/05/youtube-future/
  24. Geipel A (forthcoming 2018) Wissenschaft@YouTube. Plattformspezifische Formen von Wissenschaftskommunikation. In: E. Lettkemann, R. Wilke, H. Knoblauch (eds) Knowledge in action: Wissen, Kommunikation und Gesellschaft. Springer, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibney E (2013) JoVE journal’s videos take strain out of new science. Times Higher Educ, 24 Oct 2013. Retrieved 21 July 2015 from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/jove-journals-videos-take-strain-out-of-new-science/2008288.article
  26. Gupta A, Nissan M, Rayess H, Zuliani GF, Carron M (2017) YouTube and rhinoplasty: an analysis of the videos available online. Am J Cosmetic Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0748806817704761. First published online 19 Apr 2017
  27. Harris A, Kelly SE, Wyatt S (2014) Autobiologies on YouTube: narratives of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. New Genetics Soc 33(1):60–78.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2014.884456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hartley J (2012) Digital futures for cultural and media studies. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  29. Jaffar AA (2012) YouTube: an emerging tool in anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ 5(3):158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jaspal R, Turner A, Nerlich B (2014) Fracking on YouTube: exploring, risks, benefits, and human values. Environ Values 23:501–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kavoori A (2011) Reading YouTube: the critical viewer’s guide. Peter Lang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K (2007) YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA 298:2482–2484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Komada M, Takao K, Nakanishi K, Miyakawa T (2009) The potential benefit of JoVE, an online video journal for science. J Inform Process Manage 52(2):69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kousha K, Thelwall M, Abdoli M (2012) The role of online videos in research communication: a content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 63(9):1710–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. León B, Bourk M (2018) Communicating Science and Technology Through Online Video. Researching a New Media Phenomenon. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Lovell J (2015). YouTube’s rock stars of science make a splash a VidCon. Scientific American. 30 July 2015. Online https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/youtube-s-rock-stars-of-science-make-a-splash-a-vidcon1/
  37. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK (2014) Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health Inform J 21(3):173–194.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458213512220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marek R (2013) Understanding YouTube: Über die Faszination eines Mediums. transcript, BielefeldCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muñoz MJ, Czurda K, Robertson-von Trotha CY (2016) Typologies of the popular science web video. J Sci Commun 15(04):A02 https://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/JCOM_1504_2016_A02.pdfGoogle Scholar
  40. Murugiah K, Vallakati A, Rajput K, Sood A, Challa NR (2011) YouTube as a source of information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 82(3):332–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Normile D (2012) Whistleblower uses YouTube to assert claims of scientific misconduct. Science Magazine News, 25 Jan 2012. Retrieved July 21, 2015 from http://news.sciencemag.org/people-events/2012/01/whistleblower-uses-youtube-assert-claims-scientific-misconduct
  42. Osterrieder A (2013) The value and use of social media as communication tool in the plant sciences. Plant Methods 9:26.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-9-26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pan X, Yan E, Hua W (2015) Science communication and dissemination in different cultures: an analysis of the audience for TED videos in China and abroad. J Assoc Inform Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23461
  44. Pandey A, Patni N, Singh M, Sood A, Singh G (2010) YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Prev Med 38(3):e1–e3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pariser E (2011) The filter bubble: what the internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Porter AJ, Hellsten I (2014) Investigating participatory dynamics through social media using a multideterminant “frame” approach: the case of climategate on YouTube. J Comput-Mediat Commun 19:1024–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prainsack B (2014) DIY genetics: the right to know your own genome. In: Chadwick R, Levitt M, Shickle D (eds) The right to know and the right not to know: genetic privacy and responsibility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 100–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rogers R (2013) Digital methods. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  49. Schäfer M (2016) Wissenschaftskommunikation online. In: Bonfadelli H et al (eds) Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 275–293Google Scholar
  50. Shapiro MA, Park HW (2015) More than entertainment: YouTube and public responses to the science of global warming and climate change. Soc Sci Inf 54(1):115–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith DK (2014) iTube, YouTube, WeTube: social media videos in chemistry education and outreach. J Chem Educ 91:1594–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Snelson C (2011) YouTube across the disciplines: a review of the literature. MERLOT J Online Learn Teach 7(1):159–169Google Scholar
  53. Snelson C, Perkins RA (2009) From silent film to YouTube™: tracing the historical roots of motion picture technologies in education. J Vis Literacy 28(1):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Snickars P, Vonderau P (eds) (2009) The YouTube reader. National Library of Sweden, Stockholm Retrieved July 21, 2015 from http://www.kb.se/dokument/aktuellt/audiovisuellt/youtubereader/youtube_reader_052009_endversion.pdfGoogle Scholar
  55. Sood A, Sarangi S, Pandey A, Murugiah K (2011) YouTube as a source of information on kidney stone disease. Urology 77(3):558–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Soukup PA (2014) Looking at, with, and through YouTube. Commun Res Trends 33(3):3–34Google Scholar
  57. Spartz JT, Su LY-F, Griffin R, Brossard D, Dunwoody S (2015) YouTube, social norms and perceived salience of climate change in the American mind. Environ Commun 11(1):1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1047887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Spicer S (2014) Exploring video abstracts in science journals: an overview and case study. J Librarian Scholar Commun 2(2):eP1110.  https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Steinberg PL, Wason S, Stern JM, Deters L, Kowal B, Seigne J (2010) YouTube as source of prostate cancer information. Urology 75(3):619–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sugimoto CR, Thelwall M (2013) Scholars on soap boxes: science communication and dissemination in TED videos. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 64(4):663–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sugimoto CR, Thelwall M, Larivière V, Tsou A, Mongeon P, Macaluso B (2013) Scientists popularizing science: characteristics and impact of TED talk presenters. PLoS One 8(4):e62403.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thelwall M, Kousha K, Weller K, Puschmann C (2012) Assessing the impact of online academic videos. In: Widén G, Holmberg K (eds) Social information Research, Emerald Group publishing limited, Bingley, p 195, 213Google Scholar
  63. Tsou A, Thelwall M, Mongeon P, Sugimoto CR (2014) A community of curious souls: an analysis of commenting behavior on TED talks videos. PLoS One 9(4):e93609.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Uldam J, Askasius T (2013) Online civic cultures: debating climate change activism on YouTube. Int J Commun 7:1185–1204Google Scholar
  65. Van Herpt, Roel (2013) PostNauka presents contemporary science. Future Minds, 30 Oct 2013. Available online http://www.vandejong.com/en/#!/en/blogs/postnauka-presents-contemporary-science/
  66. Venkatramana A, Gargb N, Kumarca N (2015) Greater freedom of speech on web 2.0 correlates with dominance of views linking vaccines to autism. Vaccine.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.01.078
  67. Welbourne DJ, Grant WJ (2015) Science communication on YouTube: factors that affect channel and video popularity. Public Underst Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515572068
  68. Wong VSS, Stevenson M, Selwa L (2013) The presentation of seizures and epilepsy in YouTube videos. Epilepsy Behav 27(1):247–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Hospital CologneResearch Unit EthicsCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations