Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

2019 Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Intellectual Property Rights and Trade in the Food and Agricultural Sectors

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_381


Introduction: New Agro-technologies Require New Legal Protection

For thousands of years, new seeds and new foods have been exchanged and traded without any legal regulation of intellectual property. Huge improvements in seed breeding resulting in increased harvests (like the ones resulting from the so-called Green Revolution in the 1960s) have been achieved just by “brown bagging,” sharing, experimenting, sometimes stealing, and imitating. However, at the end of the 1970s, biotechnology was increasingly perceived by governments as an exciting field of technological innovation that would lead to renewed economic growth and restore international competitiveness for western countries. The huge economic potential of this new field of technology would however only be unlocked, so it was thought if biotechnological inventions were to receive proper legal protection. In the landmark case of Diamond v. Chakrabartyconcerning the patentability of a genetically modified...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Public Health (CIPIH). (2006). Public health, innovation and intellectual property rights. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  2. Correa, C. M. (2006, April). La disputa sobre soja transgénica: Monsanto vs. Argentina. Le Monde Diplomatique/El Dipló.Google Scholar
  3. Drugs for Neglected Diseases Working Group (DNDWG). (2001). Fatal Imbalance, p. 10, http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/publications/reports/2001/fatal_imbalance_short.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2011.
  4. Glenna, L. L., & Cahoy, D. R. (2009). Agribusiness concentration, intellectual property, and the prospects of rural economic benefits from the emerging biofuel economy. Southern Rural Sociology, 24(2), 111–129.Google Scholar
  5. Harhoff, D., Régibeau, P., & Rockett, K. (2001). Some simple economics of GM food. Economic Policy, 16(33), 265–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Herring, R. J. (2007). Stealth seeds: Bioproperty, biosafety, biopolitics. Journal of Development Studies, 43(1), 130–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. IAASTD. (2008). Synthesis report of the international assessment of agricultural science and technology for development. Washington, DC: Island Press. http://www.agassessment.org/
  8. Jefferson, R. (2006). Science as social enterprise. Innovations, 1(4), 13–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kilman, S. (2010). Superweed outbreak triggers arms race. The Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
  10. Korthals, M. (2010). Global justice and genomics: Toward global agro-genomics agency. Genomics, Society and Policy, 6, 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krikorian, G., & Kapczynski, A. (2010). Access to knowledge in the age of intellectual property (pp. 237–252). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Zone Books. Available at http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/1890951978chap10.pdf
  12. Mortensen, D. A., Egan, J. F., Maxwell, B. D., Ryan, M. R., & Smith, R. G. (2012). Navigating a critical juncture for sustainable weed management. Bioscience, 62(1), 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Outterson, K. (2009). The legal ecology of resistance: The role of antibiotic resistance in pharmaceutical innovation. Cardozo Law Review, 31(3), 613–678.Google Scholar
  14. Pogge, T. (2008). World poverty and human rights (2nd ed.). Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rimmer, M., & McLennan, A. (Eds.). (2010). Intellectual property and emerging technologies. The new biology. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  16. Wallace, H. (2010). Bioscience for life. London: Genewatch.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Philosophy, Social Sciences GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands