Skip to main content

Animal Welfare: A Critical Examination of the Concept

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics
  • 51 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). (2003). Veterinary leaders support science-based OIE animal welfare policies. AVMA News. Available at: https://www.avma.org/News/JAVMANews/Pages/031201n.aspx. Last accessed on 2 Oct 2012.

  • American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). (2005). A comprehensive review of housing for pregnant sows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 227(10), 1580–1590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, L. (2004). What animals want: Expertise and advocacy in laboratory animal welfare policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeGrazia, D. (1996). Taking animals seriously: Mental life and moral status. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeGrazia, D. (2007). The harm of death, time-relative interests, and abortion. The Philosophical Forum, 38(1), 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D. (1995). Science, values and animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 4, 103–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D. (1999). Animal ethics and animal welfare science: Bridging the two cultures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 65, 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D., Weary, D. M., Pajor, E. A., & Milligan, B. N. (1997). A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare, 6, 187–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, R. G. (1980). Interests and rights: The case against animals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, E. (2011). The moral significance of animal pain and animal death. In T. L. Beauchamp & R. G. Frey (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of animal ethics (pp. 726–737). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, R. P. (2008). Animal welfare: Competing conceptions and their ethical implications. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, R. P. (2011). Competing conceptions of animal welfare and their ethical implications for the treatment of non-human animals. Acta Biotheoretica, 59, 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heathwood, C. (2006). Desire satisfactionism and hedonism. Philosophical Studies, 128, 539–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). (2009). Scientists and experts on gestation crates and sow welfare. Humane Society of the United States. Available at: http://www.hsus.org. Last accessed 2 Oct 2012.

  • Jones, W. T. (1975). Logical positivism. In A history of Western philosophy, Vol. V. The twentieth century to Wittgenstein and Sartre (2nd ed., revised, pp. 218–249). New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korte, S. M., Olivier, B., & Koolhaas, J. M. (2007). A new animal welfare concept based on allostasis. Physiology and Behavior, 92, 422–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, G., & Mendl, M. (1993). Why is there no simple way of measuring animal welfare? Animal Welfare, 2, 301–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlone, J. (2006). Comparison of sow welfare in the Swedish deep-bedded system and the US crated-sow system. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 229(9), 1377–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mench, J. (1998). Thirty years after Brambell: Whither animal welfare science? Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 1(2), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J. (1993). Subjectivism. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 432–441). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. (1990). The unheeded cry: Animal consciousness, animal pain, and science. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudner, R. (1998). The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments. In E. D. Klemke, R. Hollinger, & D. W. Rudge (Eds.), Introductory readings in the philosophy of science (3rd ed.). Amherst: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1991). Risk and rationality: Philosophical foundations for populist reforms. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., Lewis, D., & Johnston, M. (1989). Dispositional theories of value. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 63, 89–111, 113–137, 139–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, J. (1995). Veterinary ethics: Animal welfare, client relations, competition and collegiality (2nd ed.). St Louis: Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, S. A., & Morris, M. C. (2004). Science, pigs and politics: A New Zealand perspective on the phase-out of sow stalls. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 17, 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Rossi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Rossi, J., Garner, S. (2019). Animal Welfare: A Critical Examination of the Concept. In: Kaplan, D.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_313

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics