Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). (2003). Veterinary leaders support science-based OIE animal welfare policies. AVMA News. Available at: https://www.avma.org/News/JAVMANews/Pages/031201n.aspx. Last accessed on 2 Oct 2012.
American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). (2005). A comprehensive review of housing for pregnant sows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 227(10), 1580–1590.
Carbone, L. (2004). What animals want: Expertise and advocacy in laboratory animal welfare policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
DeGrazia, D. (1996). Taking animals seriously: Mental life and moral status. New York: Cambridge University Press.
DeGrazia, D. (2007). The harm of death, time-relative interests, and abortion. The Philosophical Forum, 38(1), 57–80.
Fraser, D. (1995). Science, values and animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 4, 103–117.
Fraser, D. (1999). Animal ethics and animal welfare science: Bridging the two cultures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 65, 171–189.
Fraser, D., Weary, D. M., Pajor, E. A., & Milligan, B. N. (1997). A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare, 6, 187–205.
Frey, R. G. (1980). Interests and rights: The case against animals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Harman, E. (2011). The moral significance of animal pain and animal death. In T. L. Beauchamp & R. G. Frey (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of animal ethics (pp. 726–737). New York: Oxford University Press.
Haynes, R. P. (2008). Animal welfare: Competing conceptions and their ethical implications. New York: Springer.
Haynes, R. P. (2011). Competing conceptions of animal welfare and their ethical implications for the treatment of non-human animals. Acta Biotheoretica, 59, 105–120.
Heathwood, C. (2006). Desire satisfactionism and hedonism. Philosophical Studies, 128, 539–563.
Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). (2009). Scientists and experts on gestation crates and sow welfare. Humane Society of the United States. Available at: http://www.hsus.org. Last accessed 2 Oct 2012.
Jones, W. T. (1975). Logical positivism. In A history of Western philosophy, Vol. V. The twentieth century to Wittgenstein and Sartre (2nd ed., revised, pp. 218–249). New York: Harcourt Brace.
Korte, S. M., Olivier, B., & Koolhaas, J. M. (2007). A new animal welfare concept based on allostasis. Physiology and Behavior, 92, 422–428.
Mason, G., & Mendl, M. (1993). Why is there no simple way of measuring animal welfare? Animal Welfare, 2, 301–319.
McGlone, J. (2006). Comparison of sow welfare in the Swedish deep-bedded system and the US crated-sow system. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 229(9), 1377–1380.
Mench, J. (1998). Thirty years after Brambell: Whither animal welfare science? Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 1(2), 91–102.
Rachels, J. (1993). Subjectivism. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 432–441). Malden: Blackwell.
Rollin, B. (1990). The unheeded cry: Animal consciousness, animal pain, and science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rudner, R. (1998). The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments. In E. D. Klemke, R. Hollinger, & D. W. Rudge (Eds.), Introductory readings in the philosophy of science (3rd ed.). Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1991). Risk and rationality: Philosophical foundations for populist reforms. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Smith, M., Lewis, D., & Johnston, M. (1989). Dispositional theories of value. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 63, 89–111, 113–137, 139–174.
Tannenbaum, J. (1995). Veterinary ethics: Animal welfare, client relations, competition and collegiality (2nd ed.). St Louis: Mosby.
Weaver, S. A., & Morris, M. C. (2004). Science, pigs and politics: A New Zealand perspective on the phase-out of sow stalls. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 17, 51–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Rossi, J., Garner, S. (2019). Animal Welfare: A Critical Examination of the Concept. In: Kaplan, D.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_313
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_313
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1178-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1179-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities