Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Boethius’ De topicis differentiis, Commentaries on

  • Heine Hansen
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_89-2

Abstract

Boethius’ On Topical Differences (De topicis differentiis) is a monograph in four books on topical argumentation, that is, argumentation based on so-called topoi or loci (literally: “places”). The seminal treatment of this subject is found in Aristotle’s Topics, but Boethius’ treatise served as the main foundation of medieval theorizing in the field for almost two centuries before the gradual rediscovery and introduction of Aristotle’s text. In this way, Boethius defined some of the basic features of the medieval approach to the issue, and as a consequence came also to influence the medieval interpretation of Aristotle’s Topics. This article surveys the surviving medieval commentaries on On Topical Differences and their approach to two questions raised by Boethius’ text, namely, what loci are and how they function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Anonymous. (2005). De topicis differentiis (ed.: Hansen, H.). Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Age Grec et Latin, 76, 45–130.Google Scholar
  2. Boethius. (1978). De topicis differentiis (trans.: Stump, E.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boethius. (1990). De topicis differentiis (ed. Nikitas, D. Z.). Athens/Paris: The Academy of Athens/Vrin.Google Scholar
  4. Martin of Dacia. (1961). Quaestiones super Librum topicorum Boethii (ed.: Roos, H., Martini de Dacia Opera, pp. 317–327. Corpus Philosophorum Danicorum Medii Aevi 2).  Copenhagen: G.E.C. Gad.Google Scholar
  5. Peter Abelard. (1969). Super Topica glossae (ed.: dal Pra M., Pietro Abelardo, Scritti di Logica, pp. 206–330). Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
  6. Radulphus Brito. (1978). Quaestiones super Libro topicorum Boethii (ed.: Green-Pedersen, N. J.). Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Age Grec et Latin, 26, 1–92.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Ebbesen, S. (1993). The theory of loci in antiquity and the Middle Ages. In K. Jacobi (Ed.), Argumentationstheorie (pp. 15–39). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  2. Ebbesen, S. (2011). An Argument is a Soul. In I. Rosier-Catach (Ed.), Arts du langage et théologie aux confins des XIe/XIIe siècles: Textes, Maîtres, Débats (Studia Artistarum, 26, pp. 695–708). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  3. Green-Pedersen, N. J. (1973). On the interpretation of Aristotle’s Topics in the thirteenth century. Cahiers de l’lnstitut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin, 9, 1–46.Google Scholar
  4. Green-Pedersen, N. J. (1976). Discussions about the status of the Loci Dialectici in works from the middle of the 13th century. Cahiers de l’lnstitut du Moyen Age Grec et Latin, 20, 38–78.Google Scholar
  5. Green-Pedersen, N. J. (1977). The doctrine of ‘Maxima Propositio’ and ‘Locus Differentia’ in commentaries from the 12th century on Boethius’ ‘Topics’. Studia Mediewistyczne, 18(2), 125–163.Google Scholar
  6. Green-Pedersen, N. J. (1984). The tradition of the topics in the Middle Ages. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Green-Pedersen, N. J. (1987). The topics in medieval logic. Argumentation, 1, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hansen, H. (2011). In voce/in re in a Late XIth-Century Commentary on Boethius’ Topics. In I. Rosier-Catach (Ed.), Arts du langage et théologie aux confins des XIe/XIIe siècles: Textes, Maîtres, Débats (Studia Artistarum, 26, pp. 693–676). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  9. Martin, C. (2009). The development of Abaelard’s theory of topical inference. In J. Biard & F. Mariani Zini (Eds.), Les lieux de l’argumentation: Histoire du syllogisme topique d’Aristote à Leibniz (pp. 249–270). Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Stump, E. (1989). Dialectic and its place in the development of medieval logic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Saxo Institute, University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark