Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Berthold of Moosburg

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_82-2

Abstract

Berthold of Moosburg was a fourteenth-century German Dominican. He was called to direct the Dominican studium in Cologne in 1335, where he was involved in resolving the crisis caused by the conviction of Meister Eckhart’s doctrines (1329). The doctrinal solution proposed by Berthold is contained in his commentary on Proclus’s Elements of Theology (Expositio super elementationem theologicam Procli), the only medieval commentary on Proclus, a veritable summa of Neoplatonism. Berthold’s project was to promote the return to the Neoplatonic tradition of the German Dominicans, dating back to Albertus Magnus. He demonstrated that the Albertine school was an autonomous and unitary cultural identity that had its roots in ancient wisdom, of which Proclus, according to Berthold, was the most outstanding exponent. Berthold sees in the Greek diadochus a “divine man” who could scan the divine properties, which are present in the totality of the real world, and therefore ascend to God only by means of the natural reason. In the same way, according to Berthold, the philosopher who studies Proclian theorems performs a cognitive ascent which leads him to the contemplation of God. This is possible by virtue of the presence in man of a divine faculty, i.e., the “One of the soul.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Bertholdus de Mosburch. In L. Sturlese, et al. (Ed.), Expositio super Elementationem theologicam Procli, I–VIII. Hamburg: Meiner, 1984–2014. (Corpus Philosophorum Teutonicorum Medii Aevi VI, 1–8).Google Scholar
  2. Bertoldo di Moosburg. (2000). In A. Beccarisi (Ed.), Tabula contentorum in Expositione super Elementationem theologicam Procli. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. de Libera, A. (1984). Introduction à la mystique rhénane d’Albert le Grand à Maître Eckhart (pp. 317–442). Paris: O.E.I.L.Google Scholar
  2. Gersh, S. E. (2001). Berthold von Moosburg and the content and method of platonic philosophy. In J. A. Aersten et al. (Eds.), Nach der Verurteilung von 1277. Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzen Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts. Studien und Texte (pp. 493–503). Berlin: W. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  3. Imbach, R. (1996). Chronique de philosophie. Le (néo-)platonisme médiéval, Proclus latin et l’école dominicaine allemande. In R. Imbach & Quodlibeta (Eds.), Ausgewählte Artikel (pp. 129–151). Freiburg Schweiz: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  4. Iremadze, T. (2004). Konzeptionen Des Denkens Im Neuplatonismus: Zur Rezeption Der Proklischen Philosophie Im Deutschen Und Georgischen Mittelalter Dietrich von Freiberg – Berthold von Moosburg – Joane Petrizi. Amsterdam: Gruner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. King, E. A. (2016). Supersapientia. In A Study of the Expositio super Elementationem theologicam Procli of Berthold von Moosburg. University of Cambridge, dissertation.Google Scholar
  6. König-Pralong, C. (2014). Expérience et sciences de la nature chez Dietrich de Freiberg et Berthold de Moosburg. In L. Bianchi & C. Crisciani (Eds.), Forme e oggetti della conoscenza nel XIV secolo. Studi in ricordo di Maria Elena Reina (pp. 107–133). Firenze: Sismel-Edizioni del Galluzzo. (Micrologus’ Library 61).Google Scholar
  7. Ludueña, E. (2015). Creatio y determinatio en la Escuela Renana: de Alberto Magno a Bertoldo de Moosburg. Princípios: Revista de Filosofia, Natal, 37(2015), 77–97.Google Scholar
  8. Retucci, F. (2016). Sententia Procli alti philosophi. Notes on an anonymous commentary on Proclus’ Elementatio theologica. In D. Calma (Ed.), Neoplatonism in the middle ages: New commentaries on liber de Causis and Elementatio Theologica (Vol. II, pp. 99–179). Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sannino, A. (2000). The hermetic sources in Berthold of Moosburg. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institute, 63, 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sannino, A. (2003). Il concetto ermetico di natura in Bertoldo di Moosburg. In P. Lucentini et al. (Eds.), Hermetism from late antiquity to humanism (pp. 203–221). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  11. Sannino, A. (2008). Il Liber viginti quattuor philosophorum nella metafisica di Bertoldo di Moosburg. In A. Beccarisi et al. (Eds.), Per perscrutationem philosophicam. Neue Perspektiven der mittelalterlichen Forschung. Loris Sturlese zum 60. Geburtstag gewidmet (pp. 252–272). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  12. Sturlese, L. (1984). Proclo ed Ermete in Germania da Alberto Magno a Bertoldo di Moosburg. Per una prospettiva di ricerca sulla cultura filosofica tedesca nel secolo delle sue origini (1250–1350). In K. Flash (Ed.), Von Meister Dietrich zu Meister Eckhart (pp. 22–33). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  13. Sturlese, L. (1985). Note su Bertoldo di Moosburg O.P., scienziato e filosofo. Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie, 32, 249–259.Google Scholar
  14. Sturlese, L. (1987). Il dibattito sul Proclo latino nel Medioevo fra l’università di Parigi e lo studium di Colonia. In G. Boss & G. Seel (Eds.), Proclus et son influence (pp. 261–285). Zürich: Éditions du Grand Midi.Google Scholar
  15. Sturlese, L. (2007). Homo divinus. Der Prokloskommentar Bertholds von Moosburg und die Probleme der nacheckhartschen Zeit. In L. Sturlese (Ed.), Homo divinus. Philosophische Projekte in Deutschland zwischen Meister Eckhart und Heinrich Seuse (pp. 137–154). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  16. Tutz, I. J. (2002). Erst-Eines, Intellekte, Intellektualität: eine Studie zu Berthold von Moosburg. Hamburg: Kovač.Google Scholar
  17. Zavattero, I. (2005). La figura e il pensiero di Proclo in Bertoldo di Moosburg, ARKETE. Rivista di studi filosofici, 1(2005), 51–67.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Lettere e FilosofiaUniversità di TrentoTrentoItaly