Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Abū Hāshim al-Jubbā’ī

  • Jan Thiele
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_608-1

Abstract

Abū Hāshim al-Jubbāʾī (b. 861 or, more likely, 890; d. 933) was one of the most influential representatives of Muʿtazilism, a school of “rational theology” – or ʿilm al-kalām (literally “science of speech”) as the discipline is termed in the Islamic intellectual tradition. He significantly developed the doctrinal system of the “School of Baṣra,” and his followers are sometimes called after him “Bahshamiyya” or “Bahāshima.” The most important element of Abū Hāshim’s metaphysical thinking was his development of the so-called theory of “states” (pl. aḥwāl, sing. ḥāl). According to this doctrine, the qualifications of beings have an ontological reality that is neither described by existence nor nonexistence. The theory helped him to explain the nature of God’s attributes without asserting the existence of co-eternal beings in God. Abū Hāshim also claimed that the very being of things does not collapse into their existence. It was therefore debated whether or not his teaching had an influence on Avicenna’s essence-existence distinction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  1. Madelung, W., & Schmidtke, S. (Eds.). (2016). Al-Ṣāḥib Ibn ʿAbbād: Promoter of rational theology. Two Muʿtazilī kalām texts from the Cairo Geniza. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Adang, C., Schmidtke, S., & Sklare, D. (Eds.). (2007). A common rationality: Muʿtazilism in Islam and Judaism. Würzburg: Ergon.Google Scholar
  2. Alami, A. (2001). L’ontologie modale: Étude de la théorie des modes d’Abū Hāšim al-Ǧubbāʾī. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  3. Dhanani, A. (1993). The physical theory of Kalām: Atoms, space, and void in Basrian Muʿtazilī cosmology. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  4. Frank, R. M. (1978). Beings and their attributes: The teaching of the Basrian School of the Muʿtazila in the classical period. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  5. Frank, R. M. (1980). Al-Maʿdūm wal-Mawjūd. The non-existent, the existent, and the possible in the teaching of Abū Hāšim and his followers. Mélanges de l’Institut Dominicain d’Études Orientales, 14, 185–210.Google Scholar
  6. Gimaret, D. (1976). Matériaux pour une bibliographie des Ǧubbāʾī. Journal Asiatique, 264, 277–332.Google Scholar
  7. Gimaret, D. (1984). Matériaux pour une bibliographie des Jubbaʾi: note complémentaire. In M. E. Marmura (Ed.), Islamic theology and philosophy: Studies in honor of G.F. Hourani (pp. 31–38). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  8. Schmidtke, S. (2016). The Muʿtazilite movement (III): The scholastic phase. In S. Schmidtke (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Islamic theology (pp. 159–180). Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199696703.013.46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Thiele, J. (2016). Abū Hāshim al-Jubbāʾī’s (d. 321/933) theory of ‘states’ (aḥwāl) and its adaption by Ashʿarite theologians. In S. Schmidtke (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Islamic theology (pp. 364–383). Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199696703.013.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Ciencias Humanas y SocialesConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasMadridSpain