Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Aristotelianism in the Greek, Latin, Syriac, Arabic, and Hebrew Traditions

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_51-2

Abstract

Aristotle was the most important ancient philosopher for all four main traditions of medieval philosophy: Greek philosophy from Byzantium; Latin philosophy; philosophy in Arabic (the work mainly of Muslims, but also Jews and Christians); and, from the thirteenth century, philosophy written by Jews in Hebrew. All these traditions drew, directly, or indirectly, on Aristotle as transmitted by the Neoplatonic schools of late antiquity. But the way in which the Aristotelian texts were disseminated (in translation, except in Byzantium) and studied varied in each of these traditions. And, although all the medieval philosophers had it in common that they lived in cultures dominated by a monotheistic religion, the range of attitudes to Aristotle varied from one to another. This entry has the strictly limited aim of giving enough basic information about each of these circumstances to enable comparisons to be made. Fuller treatment of each of the areas it covers will be found elsewhere in the Encyclopedia. Readers will also find a fuller exposition of most of the particular view suggested here in Marenbon (Medieval philosophy; an historical and philosophical introduction. Routledge, London/New York, 2007; Medieval philosophy. A very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

Secondary Sources

  1. Brenet, J.-B. (Ed.). (2007). Averroes et les averroismes juif et latin. Brepols, Turnhout. Textes et études du moyen âge 40.Google Scholar
  2. Brumberg-Chaumont, J. (Ed.) (2013). Ad notitiam ignoti. L’Organon dans la transatio studiorum à l’époque d’Albert le Grand. Brepols, Turnhout. Studia artistarum 37.Google Scholar
  3. Brungs, A., Mudroch, V., & Schulthess, P. (Eds.). (2017). Philosophie des Mittelalters 4. 13. Jahrhundert. Schwabe, Basel. Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie.Google Scholar
  4. Clucas, L. (1981). The trial of John Italos and the crisis of intellectual values in Byzantium in the eleventh century. Miscellanea Byzantina Monacensia 26. Institut für Byzantinistik, Neugriechische Philologie, und Byzantinische Kunstgeschichte der Universität München.Google Scholar
  5. El-Rouyaheb, K., & Schmidtke, S. (Eds.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of Islamic philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Griffel, F. (2000). Apostasie und Toleranz im Islam. Die Entwicklung zu al-Gazalis Urteil gegen die Philosophie und die Reaktionen der Philosophen (Islamic philosophy, theology and science. Texts and studies, Vol. 40). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  7. Griffel, F. (2009). Al-Ghazālī’s philosophical theology. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gutas, D. (1988). Greek thought, Arabic culture. In The Eraeco-Arabic translation movement in Baghdad and early ‘Abbāsid society (2nd/4th, 8th/10th centuries). London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gutas, D. (1999). The “Alexandria to Baghdad” complex of narratives. A contribution to the study of philosophical and medical historiography among the Arabs. Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 10, 155–193.Google Scholar
  10. D. Gutas. (2002). The heritage of Avicenna: The golden age of Arabic philosophy, 1000–ca. 1350. In J. Janssens & D. De Smet (Ed.), Avicenna and his heritage (Ancient and medieval philosophy, series I, Vol. 28). Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Harvey, S. (1992). Did Maimonides’ letter to Samuel ibn Tibbon determine which philosophers would be studied by later Jewish thinkers. Jewish Quarterly Review New Series, 83(1/2), 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hayoun, M.-R., & De Libera, A. (1991). Averroes and I'averroisme, Que Sais-Je? Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  13. H. Hugonnard-Roche. (2004). La logique d’Aristote du grec au syriaque. Études sur la transmission de l’Organon et leur interprétation philosophique (Textes et traditions, Vol. 9). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  14. Ierodiakonou, K., & Börje, B. (2008). Byzantine philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2008 edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/byzantine-philosophy/.
  15. Marenbon, J. (1993/2000). Medieval Latin commentaries and glosses on Aristotelian logical texts, before c. 1150 A.D. as republished and revised in Aristotelian logic, Platonism, and the context of early medieval philosophy (Collected studies series, Vol. 696). Aldershot/Burlington/Vermont: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  16. Marenbon, J. (2007). Medieval philosophy; an historical and philosophical introduction. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Marenbon, John (ed.) (2009). The Cambridge Companion to Boethius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Marenbon, J. (2015). Pagans and philosophers. The problem of paganism from Augustine to Leibniz. Princeton/Woodstock: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marenbon, J. (2016). Medieval philosophy. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pasnau, R. (2010). The Cambridge history of medieval philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rudolph, U. (Ed.) (2012). Philosophie in der islamischen Welt. I. 8.-10. Jahrhundert. Schwabe, Basel. Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie.Google Scholar
  22. Street, T. (2004). Arabic logic. In D. Gabbay & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the history of logic I (pp. 523–596). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  23. Street, T. (2013). Street, Tony. Arabic and Islamic philosophy of language and logic. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/arabic-islamic-language/.Google Scholar
  24. Sylla, E. (2001). Ideo quasi mendicare oportet intellectum humanum: The role of theology in John Buridan’s natural philosophy. In J. M. M. H. Thijssen & J. Zupko (Eds.), The metaphysics and natural philosophy of John Buridan (Medieval and early modern science, Vol. 2). Leiden/Boston/Cologne: Brill.Google Scholar
  25. Zonta, M. (1996). La filosofia antica nel Medioevo ebraico: le traduzioni ebraiche medievali dei testi filosofici antichi (Philosophica, Vol. 2). Brescia: Paideia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Trinity CollegeUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK