Skip to main content

Aristotelianism in the Greek, Latin, Syriac, Arabic, and Hebrew Traditions

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy
  • 114 Accesses

Abstract

Aristotle was the most important ancient philosopher for all four main traditions of medieval philosophy: Greek philosophy from Byzantium; Latin philosophy; philosophy in Arabic (the work mainly of Muslims, but also Jews and Christians); and, from the thirteenth century, philosophy written by Jews in Hebrew. All these traditions drew, directly, or indirectly, on Aristotle as transmitted by the Neoplatonic schools of late antiquity. But the way in which the Aristotelian texts were disseminated (in translation, except in Byzantium) and studied varied in each of these traditions. And, although all the medieval philosophers had it in common that they lived in cultures dominated by a monotheistic religion, the range of attitudes to Aristotle varied from one to another. This entry has the strictly limited aim of giving enough basic information about each of these circumstances to enable comparisons to be made. Fuller treatment of each of the areas it covers will be found elsewhere in the Encyclopedia. Readers will also find a fuller exposition of most of the particular view suggested here in Marenbon (Medieval philosophy; an historical and philosophical introduction. Routledge, London/New York, 2007; Medieval philosophy. A very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Secondary Sources

  • Brenet, J.-B. (Ed.). (2007). Averroes et les averroismes juif et latin. Brepols, Turnhout. Textes et études du moyen âge 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumberg-Chaumont, J. (Ed.) (2013). Ad notitiam ignoti. L’Organon dans la transatio studiorum à l’époque d’Albert le Grand. Brepols, Turnhout. Studia artistarum 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brungs, A., Mudroch, V., & Schulthess, P. (Eds.). (2017). Philosophie des Mittelalters 4. 13. Jahrhundert. Schwabe, Basel. Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clucas, L. (1981). The trial of John Italos and the crisis of intellectual values in Byzantium in the eleventh century. Miscellanea Byzantina Monacensia 26. Institut für Byzantinistik, Neugriechische Philologie, und Byzantinische Kunstgeschichte der Universität München.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Rouyaheb, K., & Schmidtke, S. (Eds.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of Islamic philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffel, F. (2000). Apostasie und Toleranz im Islam. Die Entwicklung zu al-Gazalis Urteil gegen die Philosophie und die Reaktionen der Philosophen (Islamic philosophy, theology and science. Texts and studies, Vol. 40). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffel, F. (2009). Al-Ghazālī’s philosophical theology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D. (1988). Greek thought, Arabic culture. In The Eraeco-Arabic translation movement in Baghdad and early ‘Abbāsid society (2nd/4th, 8th/10th centuries). London/New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D. (1999). The “Alexandria to Baghdad” complex of narratives. A contribution to the study of philosophical and medical historiography among the Arabs. Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 10, 155–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gutas. (2002). The heritage of Avicenna: The golden age of Arabic philosophy, 1000–ca. 1350. In J. Janssens & D. De Smet (Ed.), Avicenna and his heritage (Ancient and medieval philosophy, series I, Vol. 28). Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, S. (1992). Did Maimonides’ letter to Samuel ibn Tibbon determine which philosophers would be studied by later Jewish thinkers. Jewish Quarterly Review New Series, 83(1/2), 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayoun, M.-R., & De Libera, A. (1991). Averroes and I'averroisme, Que Sais-Je? Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Hugonnard-Roche. (2004). La logique d’Aristote du grec au syriaque. Études sur la transmission de l’Organon et leur interprétation philosophique (Textes et traditions, Vol. 9). Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ierodiakonou, K., & Börje, B. (2008). Byzantine philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2008 edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/byzantine-philosophy/.

  • Marenbon, J. (1993/2000). Medieval Latin commentaries and glosses on Aristotelian logical texts, before c. 1150 A.D. as republished and revised in Aristotelian logic, Platonism, and the context of early medieval philosophy (Collected studies series, Vol. 696). Aldershot/Burlington/Vermont: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marenbon, J. (2007). Medieval philosophy; an historical and philosophical introduction. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marenbon, John (ed.) (2009). The Cambridge Companion to Boethius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marenbon, J. (2015). Pagans and philosophers. The problem of paganism from Augustine to Leibniz. Princeton/Woodstock: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marenbon, J. (2016). Medieval philosophy. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pasnau, R. (2010). The Cambridge history of medieval philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, U. (Ed.) (2012). Philosophie in der islamischen Welt. I. 8.-10. Jahrhundert. Schwabe, Basel. Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, T. (2004). Arabic logic. In D. Gabbay & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the history of logic I (pp. 523–596). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, T. (2013). Street, Tony. Arabic and Islamic philosophy of language and logic. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/arabic-islamic-language/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylla, E. (2001). Ideo quasi mendicare oportet intellectum humanum: The role of theology in John Buridan’s natural philosophy. In J. M. M. H. Thijssen & J. Zupko (Eds.), The metaphysics and natural philosophy of John Buridan (Medieval and early modern science, Vol. 2). Leiden/Boston/Cologne: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonta, M. (1996). La filosofia antica nel Medioevo ebraico: le traduzioni ebraiche medievali dei testi filosofici antichi (Philosophica, Vol. 2). Brescia: Paideia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Marenbon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Marenbon, J. (2018). Aristotelianism in the Greek, Latin, Syriac, Arabic, and Hebrew Traditions. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_51-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_51-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics