Skip to main content

Roman Empire

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy
  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

The Empire and the papacy represented the unity of Latin Christendom. As secular head of Christianity the emperor did not enjoy the same stability in his position of leadership as the pope. An emperor only held office for roughly half the years elapsed between 962 and 1493, as long vacancies interrupted the chain of emperors. Moreover, the concept of Empire was in constant flux. Contrary to the papacy, which was defined by a corpus of canonical laws and conciliar decrees, the Empire was shaped by collective memory and by individual interpretation. The concept of Empire varied according to the knowledge held of the Empire of antiquity. Some authors characterized the office of emperor as an exclusively secular authority which had been established by Augustus. Others emphasized the Christian duties of the emperor, referring to the famous penance of the emperor Theodosius I in front of Ambrose of Milan. In Rome, the concept of the emperor as head of the city itself had never truly died out. Equally, a king was referred to as emperor in Spain and in England, if he dominated other kings in his region. Yet, in spite of this erratic concept of Empire, it inspired a philosophical discussion about the necessity of a political world order. This discussion emerged in the late Middle Ages and anticipated early modern theories about supranational institutions and the deficiency of nation-states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Dante. (1998). Monarchia (ed.: Kay, R. Studies and texts, 131). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbert of Admont. (2000). De ortu et fine Romani imperii. Three tracts on empire. Engelbert of Admont, Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini and Juan de Torquemada (ed.: Izbicki, ThM., Nederman, C. J.). Bristol/Sterling: Thoemmes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbert of Admont. (2014). De ortu et fine Romani imperii (1, 3 vols.; ed.: Schneider, H.). MGH Staatsschriften. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad of Megenberg. (1914). De translacione Romani imperii. In R. Scholz (Ed.), Unbekannte kirchenpolitische Streitschriften aus der Zeit Ludwigs des Bayern (1327–1354) (Vol. 2, pp. 249–345). Rom: Loescher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupold of Bebenburg. (2004). Politische Schriften des Lupold von Bebenburg (4 vol.; ed.: Miethke, J., Flueler, C.). MGH Staatsschriften. Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsilius of Padua. (1993). Writings on the empire: Defensor minor and De translatione imperii (ed.: Nederman, C. J.). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas of Cusa. (1996). De concordantia catholica (ed.: Sigmund, P. E.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter of Andlau. (1998). Libellus de caesarea monarchia (ed.: Müller, R. A.). Frankfurt: Insel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolomini Aeneas Silivus. (2000). De ortu et auctoritate Romani imperii. Three tracts on empire. Engelbert of Admont, Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini and Juan de Torquemada (ed.: Izbicki, ThM., Nederman, C. J.). Bristol/Sterling: Thoemmes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roselli Antonio. (1612). Monarchia. In M. Goldast & S. Monarchia (Eds.), Romani imperii (Vol. 1, pp. 252–556). Hannover: Biermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • William of Ockham. (1956/1963/1974/1997). Opera politica (1–4 vols.; ed.: Offler, H. S.). Manchester (1956/1963/1974)/Oxford (1997): Manchester University Press/Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Burns, J. H. (1992). Lordship, kingship and empire. The idea of monarchy, 1400–1525. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Briguglia, G. (2013). Marsilio da Padova. Rome: Caroccci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheneval, F. (2002). Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Bedeutung. Ãœber die Entstehung und die philosophischen Grundlagen des supranationalen Denkens der Moderne. Basel: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. T. (1957). Dante and the idea of Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hageneder, O. (1985). Weltherrschaft im Mittelalter. Mitteilungen des Instituts für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung, 93, 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidemann, M. (2008). Heinrich VII. (1308–1313). Kaiseridee im Spannungsfeld von staufischer Universalherrschaft und frühneuzeitlicher Partikularautonomie. Warendorf: Fahlbusch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2007). Eclipse of empire? Perceptions of the western empire and its rulers in late-medieval France. Turnhout: Brepols.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kneupper, F. C. (2016). The empire at the end of time. Identity and reform in late medieval German prophecy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCready, W. D. (1974). The problem of empire in Augustinus Triumphus and late medieval papal hierocratic theory. Traditio, 30, 325–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrade, A. S. (1974). The political thought of William of Ockham. Personal and institutional principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nederman, C. (1995). From Defensor pacis to Defensor minor: The problem of empire in Marsiglio of Padua. History of Political Thought, 16, 313–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederman, C. (2005). Empire and the historiography of European political thought: Marsiglio of Padua, Nicholas of Cusa, and the medieval/modern divide. Journal of the History of Ideas, 66, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, K. (1993). The prince and the law, 1200–1600: Sovereignty and rights in the western legal tradition. Berkeley/Oxford: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, G. (1964). Studies in medieval legal thought. Public law and the state 1100–1323. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scales, L. (2001). Monarchy and German identity in the later Middle Ages. Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester, 83, 167–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scales, L. (2012). The shaping of German identity. Authority and crisis, 1245–1414. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shogimen, T. (2007). Ockham and political discourse in the late Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ubl, K. (2006). Die Rechte des Kaisers in der Theorie deutscher Gelehrter des 14. Jahrhunderts (Engelbert von Admont, Lupold von Bebenburg, Konrad von Megenberg). In C. Märtl (Ed.), Konrad von Megenberg (1309–1374). Das Wissen der Zeit (pp. 353–387). München: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, H. G. (2003). Das Reich in der politischen Theorie der Legistik und im Umkreis der päpstlichen Kurie. In M. Werner (Ed.), Heinrich Raspe – Landgraf von Thüringen und römischer König (1227–1247). Fürsten, König und Reich in spätstaufischer Zeit (pp. 29–52). Frankfurt: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl Ubl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ubl, K. (2019). Roman Empire. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_452-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_452-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics