Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Henrik Lagerlund

Alchemy in the Latin World

  • Sébastien Moureau
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_22-2

Abstract

Alchemy, originally an attempt to find a process to transmute base metals (such as lead and copper) into gold or silver, may be considered a metallurgical science mixed up with considerations of theoretical philosophy. Medieval alchemy in the West may be divided into two main stages: from the middle of the twelfth century to the end of the thirteenth century, the Arabic material was assimilated and Latin treatises were composed on the basis of this material, but with an increasing level of distinctive features; during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, alchemy developed from the Latin texts of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries rather than from Arabic sources.

Alchemy never came into universities; it was a knowledge on the fringe. However, it had a very close link with natural philosophy and medicine. The authoritative texts in alchemy are few in number: some Arabic translations (especially those attributed to al-Rāzī and Avicenna), the Summa perfectionis, and some texts attributed to Arnald of Villanova, Ramon Llull, and Johannes de Rupescissa. Authors used to compile ideas from previous major alchemists.

The Latin word alchimia is a transcription of the Arabic al-kīmiyā’, which is itself a transcription of the Greek word χ υ μεíα (fusion).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

Primary Sources

  1. Barthélémy, P. (2002). La Sedacina ou l’Œuvre au crible: l’alchimie de Guillaume Sedacer, carme catalan de la fin du XIV e siècle. Paris: SÉHA.Google Scholar
  2. Crisciani, C. (1976). Preziosa Margarita Novella/Pietro Bono da Ferrara; Edizione del volgarizzamento con introduzione e note. Firenze: La Nuova Italia Editrice.Google Scholar
  3. Holmyard, E. J., & Mandeville, D. C. (1927). Avicennae de congelatione et conglutinatione lapidum being a section of the Kitâb al-Shifâ‘ (Latin and Arabic texts, English trans). Paris: Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
  4. Moureau, S. (2016). Le De anima alchimique du pseudo-Avicenne, étude, édition critique et traduction annotée. Micrologus’ Library 76. Florence: Sismel – Edizioni del Galluzzo.Google Scholar
  5. Newman, W. (1991). The Summa Perfectionis of pseudo-Geber, a critical edition, translation and study. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  6. Pereira, M. (1999). Il ‘Testamentum’ alchemico attribuito a Raimundo Lullo. Firenze: SISMEL.Google Scholar
  7. Stavenhagen, L. (1974). A testament of alchemy, being the revelations of Morienus to Khalid ibn Yazid ibn Mu‘amiyya. (Latin ed and English trans). Hanover: The Brandeis University Press.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

    General Works

    1. Calvet, A. (1998). Alchimie – Occident médiéval. In J. Servier (Ed.), Dictionnaire critique de l’ésotérisme (pp. 31–38). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
    2. Ganzenmüller, W. (1936). Die Alchemie im Mittelalter. Paderborn: Bonifacius.Google Scholar
    3. Halleux, R. (1979). Les textes alchimiques. Typologie des sources du Moyen Âge occidental (Vol. 32). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
    4. Halleux, R. (1996). The reception of Arabic alchemy in the West. In R. Rashed (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the history of Arabic science (Vol. 3. Technology, alchemy and life sciences, pp. 886–902). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
    5. Mandosio, J.-M. (1993). L’alchimie dans les classifications des sciences et des arts à la Renaissance. In J.-C. Margolin & S. Matton (Eds.), Alchimie et philosophie à la Renaissance (pp. 11–41). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
    6. Obrist, B. (1995). Vers une histoire de l’alchimie médiévale. In Micrologus 3, The crisis of alchemy (pp. 3–43). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
    7. Obrist, B. (1996). Art et nature dans l’alchimie médiévale. Rev Hist Sci, 49, 215–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Other Sources

  1. Albertus Magnus (1967). Book of minerals., trans. Wyckoff D. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Calvet, A. (2011). Les œuvres alchimiques attribuées à Arnaud de Villeneuve, Grand œuvre, médecine et prophétie au Moyen Âge. Textes et Travaux de Chrysopœia (Vol. 11). Paris: S.É.H.A.-ARCHÈ.Google Scholar
  3. Halleux, R. (1981). Les ouvrages alchimiques de Jean de Rupescissa. In Histoire littéraire de la France (Vol. 41,pp. 241–284). Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
  4. Kraus, P. (1942–1943). Jābir ibn Ḥayyān, contribution à l’histoire des idées scientifiques dans l’Islam. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
  5. Newman, W. (1994). The alchemy of Roger Bacon and the Tres epistolae attributed to him. In Comprendre et maîtriser la nature au moyen âge: Mélanges d’histoire des sciences offerts à Guy Beaujouan (pp. 461–479). Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
  6. Pereira, M. (1989). The alchemical corpus attributed to Raymond Lull. London: The Warburg Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Rampling, J. (2008). Establishing the canon: George Ripley and his Alchemical sources. Ambix, 55, 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Warburg InstituteUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Institut OrientalisteUniversité Catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium