Privatization and Diversity in Higher Education

  • Vera Rocha
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_94-1

Synonyms

Brief Definition of Privatization

Privatization in the context of higher education (HE) can be defined as the emergence of private (for profit) higher education institutions (HEIs) – also referred to as the “private (higher education) sector” (“Private Higher Education”) – either worldwide or within national higher education systems. This phenomenon is normally quantified based on the share of total higher education enrollment in private HEIs (Levy 2012).

Besides defining the rise of private higher education, the term privatization in HE sector is also often used to define the necessity for public higher education institutions and systems to earn income in order to pay for (at least part of) their operation and, thereby, decrease their dependence on public funds (Altbach et al. 2009) (“Public Funding”).

Brief Definition of Diversity in Higher Education

Diversity in higher education is a broad multidimensional concept comprising different...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Altbach, Philip G., Liz Reisberg, and Laura E. Rumbley. 2009. Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an academic revolution. Report Prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education, UNESCO.Google Scholar
  2. Birnbaum, Robert. 1983. Maintaining diversity in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Huisman, Jeroen, Lynn Meek, and Fiona Wood. 2007. Institutional diversity in higher education: A cross-national and longitudinal analysis. Higher Education Quarterly 61 (4): 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Levy, Daniel C. 2012. How important is private higher education in Europe? A regional analysis in global context. European Journal of Education 47 (2): 178–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Rossi, Federica. 2009. Increased competition and diversity in higher education: An empirical analysis of the Italian university system. Higher Education Policy 22 (4): 389–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rossi, Federica. 2010. Massification, competition, and organizational diversity in higher education: Evidence from Italy. Studies in Higher Education 35 (3): 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Teixeira, Pedro, and Alberto Amaral. 2001. Private higher education and diversity: An exploratory survey. Higher Education Quarterly 55 (4): 359–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Teixeira, Pedro, David Dill, Alberto Amaral, and Ben Jongbloed, eds. 2004. Markets in higher education. Amsterdam: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  9. Teixeira, Pedro, Vera Rocha, Ricardo Biscaia, and Margarida F. Cardoso. 2012a. Competition and diversity in higher education: An empirical approach to specialization patterns of Portuguese institutions. Higher Education 63 (3): 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Teixeira, Pedro, Vera Rocha, Ricardo Biscaia, and Margarida F. Cardoso. 2012b. Myths, beliefs, and realities: Public-private competition and program diversification in Higher Education. Journal of Economic Issues 46 (3): 683–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Teixeira, Pedro, Vera Rocha, Ricardo Biscaia, and Margarida F. Cardoso. 2013. Competition and diversification in public and private higher education. Applied Economics 45 (35): 4949–4958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Teixeira, Pedro, Vera Rocha, Ricardo Biscaia, and Margarida F. Cardoso. 2014. Policy changes, marketisation trends, and spatial dispersion in European higher education: Comparing public and private sectors. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society 7 (2): 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Teixeira, Pedro, Ricardo Biscaia, Vera Rocha, and Margarida F. Cardoso. 2016. What role for private higher education in Europe? Reflecting about current patterns and future prospects. In A global perspective on private higher education, ed. M. Shah and C.S. Nair, 13–28. Cambridge: Chandos Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Innovation and Organizational EconomicsCopenhagen Business SchoolCopenhagenDenmark